Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Sentencing (2)
- "Death to the Klan" rally (1)
- 100:1 ratio (1)
- 9/11 (1)
- Afghanistan (1)
-
- Al-Qaeda (1)
- Alien (1)
- American Nazi Party (1)
- Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (1)
- Ashcroft (1)
- CIA (1)
- CWP (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Cocaine (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Crack (1)
- Criminal (1)
- DNA (1)
- Death sentence (1)
- Detainee (1)
- Disparity (1)
- Egypt (1)
- Eligibility (1)
- Ex post facto (1)
- Extraordinary (1)
- Eye witness (1)
- Federal District Judge Robert R. Merhige (1)
- Greensboro massacre (1)
- Guidelines (1)
- Identifications (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 37 of 37
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Extraordinary Rendition: A Wrong Without A Right, Robert Johnson
Extraordinary Rendition: A Wrong Without A Right, Robert Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Principles For Virginia's Fifth Century, Hon. Robert F. Mcdonnell
First Principles For Virginia's Fifth Century, Hon. Robert F. Mcdonnell
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Adding Fuel To The Fire: United States V. Booker And The Crack Versus Powder Cocaine Sentencing Disparity, Briton K. Nelson
Adding Fuel To The Fire: United States V. Booker And The Crack Versus Powder Cocaine Sentencing Disparity, Briton K. Nelson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Booker: The Demise Of Mandatory Federal Sentencing Guidelines And The Return Of Indeterminate Sentencing, Jonathan Chiu
United States V. Booker: The Demise Of Mandatory Federal Sentencing Guidelines And The Return Of Indeterminate Sentencing, Jonathan Chiu
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does Time Eclipse Crime? Stogner V. California And The Court's Determination Of The Ex Post Facto Limitations On Retroactive Justice, Ryan D. Frei
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Racists And Radicals Meet, Ronald J. Bacigal, Margaret Ivey Bacigal
When Racists And Radicals Meet, Ronald J. Bacigal, Margaret Ivey Bacigal
Law Faculty Publications
In order to stimulate scholarly discussion, this Essay presents an empirical account of the Greensboro incident from the perspective of those who participated in the episode and in the resulting civil rights trial. The Essay traces the circumstances leading to the violence and reviews the resultant litigation with special attention given to the role of the trial judge in politically volatile cases. The candid reflections offered by the trial judge and other participants allow the reader to examine both the event and the litigation, not merely in the abstract, but as implemented by flesh-andblood lawyers, litigants, and judges. .