Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative review (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- Amar (Akhil Reed) (1)
- Australia (1)
-
- Civil Law (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutions (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Costs and fees (1)
- Cumulative impacts (1)
- EIA (1)
- Environmental impact assessment (1)
- Environmental law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Process (1)
- Judicial process (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Lettow (Renee B.) (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Mistake (1)
- NEPA (1)
- O'Connor (Sandra Day) (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Judges
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Ms. Renee B. Lettow have written a lively, provocative article that will keep many of us who teach constitutional-criminal procedure busy for years to come. They present a reconception of the "first principles" of the Fifth Amendment, and they suggest a dramatic reconstruction of criminal procedure. As a part of that reconstruction, they propose, inter alia, that at a pretrial hearing presided over by a judicial officer, the government should be empowered to compel a suspect, under penalty of contempt, to provide links in the chain of evidence needed to convict him.
Overview Of The Role Of Precedent In The Legal System Of The United States, Ana Elena Fierro
Overview Of The Role Of Precedent In The Legal System Of The United States, Ana Elena Fierro
LLM Theses and Essays
Traditionally, legal systems have been classified as either Common Law or Civil Law; scholars distinguish these systems based on their origins, as well their attitudes towards stare decisis. Common law considers precedent as a source of binding rules, while civil law does not. However, some scholars consider the methods for legal reasoning to be almost the same in every legal system. These scholars maintain that regardless of the source of law in a particular country, once a judge determines that the facts of one case are similar to those regulated by a certain rule, the judge will apply that particular …
A Catalogue Of Judicial Federalism In The United States, Thomas E. Baker
A Catalogue Of Judicial Federalism In The United States, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Nomination Of Justice Brennan: Eisenhower's Mistake: A Look At The Historical Record, Stephen Wermiel
The Nomination Of Justice Brennan: Eisenhower's Mistake: A Look At The Historical Record, Stephen Wermiel
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
An American Perspective On Environmental Impact Assessment In Australia, Mark Squillace
An American Perspective On Environmental Impact Assessment In Australia, Mark Squillace
Publications
No abstract provided.