Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (13)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
-
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Legal Biography (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Criminal Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Agency (1)
- Applied Statistics (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Institution
-
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Chapman University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (6)
- Federal courts (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Roger J Miner (3)
- Biography (2)
-
- Courts (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Precedent (2)
- Trials (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative review (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- Adversarial system (1)
- Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Agency (1)
- Amar (Akhil Reed) (1)
- American legal thought (1)
- Anne Simonett (1)
- Anti-intellectualism (1)
- Australia (1)
- Authority (1)
- Bar associations (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Clinical education (1)
- Clinton administration (1)
- Closing argument (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Collateral issues (1)
- Columbia County (1)
- Publication
-
- Articles (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Publications (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Bar Associations (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Induction Ceremonies and Investitures (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Research (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Supreme Court Preview (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Section 1: Justices' Profiles, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Justices' Profiles, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Exorcising The Evil Of Forum-Shopping, Kevin M. Clermont, Theodore Eisenberg
Exorcising The Evil Of Forum-Shopping, Kevin M. Clermont, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Most of the business of litigation comprises pretrial disputes. A common and important dispute is over where adjudication should take place. Civil litigators deal with nearly as many change-of-venue motions as trials. The battle over venue often constitutes the critical issue in a case.
The American way is to provide plaintiffs with a wide choice of venues for suit. But the American way has its drawbacks. To counter these drawbacks, an integral part of our court systems, and in particular the federal court system, is the scheme of transfer of venue "in the interest of justice." However, the leading evaluative …
The Federal Rules Of Evidence--Past, Present, And Future: A Twenty-Year Perspective, Faust Rossi
The Federal Rules Of Evidence--Past, Present, And Future: A Twenty-Year Perspective, Faust Rossi
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This Essay surveys three major transformations in state and federal rules of evidence since the introduction of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Rules have not only inspired a movement toward codification in the states, they have also liberalized the admission of expert testimony and hearsay. This partially explains thirteen states' reluctance to codify. Judges have furthered this trend by admitting far more discretionary hearsay evidence than Congress intended. Professor Rossi doubts this expansion of the hearsay exceptions would have occurred without the adoption of the FRE and suggests that the newly formed Advisory Committee will produce greater substantive changes …
Politics And The Judiciary: The Influence Of Judicial Background On Case Outcomes, Orley Ashenfelter, Theodore Eisenberg, Stewart J. Schwab
Politics And The Judiciary: The Influence Of Judicial Background On Case Outcomes, Orley Ashenfelter, Theodore Eisenberg, Stewart J. Schwab
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
It is widely believed that the background and worldview of judges influence their decisions. This article uses the fact that judges are assigned their cases randomly to assess the effect of judicial background on the outcome of cases from the day-to-day docket in three federal trial courts. Unlike the political science findings of ideological influence in published opinions, we find little evidence that judges differ in their decisions with respect to the mass of case outcomes. Characteristics of the judges or the political party of the judge's appointing president are not significant predictors of judicial decisions.
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Ms. Renee B. Lettow have written a lively, provocative article that will keep many of us who teach constitutional-criminal procedure busy for years to come. They present a reconception of the "first principles" of the Fifth Amendment, and they suggest a dramatic reconstruction of criminal procedure. As a part of that reconstruction, they propose, inter alia, that at a pretrial hearing presided over by a judicial officer, the government should be empowered to compel a suspect, under penalty of contempt, to provide links in the chain of evidence needed to convict him.
Eye On Justice, Roger J. Miner '56
Judge William W. Schwarzer And Automatic Disclosure, Carl W. Tobias
Judge William W. Schwarzer And Automatic Disclosure, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Tribute to Senior United States District Judge William W. Schwarzer upon his retirement as Director of the Federal Judicial Center.
Anti-Intellectualism, Pierre Schlag
From Hedonism To Human Rights: Felix Cohen's Alternative To Nihilism, 68 Temple L. Rev. 197 (1995), Joel R. Cornwell
From Hedonism To Human Rights: Felix Cohen's Alternative To Nihilism, 68 Temple L. Rev. 197 (1995), Joel R. Cornwell
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Legislatively Directed Judicial Activism: Some Reflections On The Meaning Of The Civil Justice Reform Act, 28 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 305 (1995), Matthew R. Kipp, Paul B. Lewis
Legislatively Directed Judicial Activism: Some Reflections On The Meaning Of The Civil Justice Reform Act, 28 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 305 (1995), Matthew R. Kipp, Paul B. Lewis
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
With the Civil Justice Reform Act (CJRA), Congress attempted to further a trend that the federal judiciary had undertaken largely on its own initiative. Sensing a critical need to address the mounting expense and delay of federal civil litigation, Congress, like the judiciary, sought to increase the degree of early and active involvement of judges in the adjudicatory process. The result of this mandate has been a further emphasis on the role of the judge as a case manager. As a necessary corollary, the liberty and self-determination of individual litigants-ideals that have historically been seen as philosophical cornerstones of the …
The Counter-Revolutionary Nature Of Justice Scalia's Traditionalism, 27 Pac. L.J. 99 (1995), Allen R. Kamp
The Counter-Revolutionary Nature Of Justice Scalia's Traditionalism, 27 Pac. L.J. 99 (1995), Allen R. Kamp
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Interpretation And Interdependence: How Judges Use The Avoidance Canon In Separation Of Powers Cases, Brian C. Murchison
Interpretation And Interdependence: How Judges Use The Avoidance Canon In Separation Of Powers Cases, Brian C. Murchison
Scholarly Articles
None available.
Freedom Of Religion & Religious Minorities In Pakistan: A Study Of Judicial Practice, Tayyab Mahmud
Freedom Of Religion & Religious Minorities In Pakistan: A Study Of Judicial Practice, Tayyab Mahmud
Faculty Articles
This article explores the practice of the superior judiciary of Pakistan as it relates to freedom of religion and rights of religious minorities. Pakistan's successive constitutions, which guarantee fundamental rights and provide for separation of powers and judicial review, contemplate judicial protection against unlawful executive and legislative actions. The record of Pakistan's judiciary about protection of the rights of religious minorities is uneven and has gone through three phases. The first phase is remarkable for unequivocal protection of freedom of religion and religious minorities. The second phase contracted this protection through undue deference to the legislature. In the last phase …
The Fault Is In Ourselves, Roger J. Miner '56
Overview Of The Role Of Precedent In The Legal System Of The United States, Ana Elena Fierro
Overview Of The Role Of Precedent In The Legal System Of The United States, Ana Elena Fierro
LLM Theses and Essays
Traditionally, legal systems have been classified as either Common Law or Civil Law; scholars distinguish these systems based on their origins, as well their attitudes towards stare decisis. Common law considers precedent as a source of binding rules, while civil law does not. However, some scholars consider the methods for legal reasoning to be almost the same in every legal system. These scholars maintain that regardless of the source of law in a particular country, once a judge determines that the facts of one case are similar to those regulated by a certain rule, the judge will apply that particular …
Highlighting A Low Point On A High Court: Some Thoughts On The Removal Of Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Rolf Larsen And The Limits Of Judicial Self-Regulation, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
A Tribute To Anne Simonett, Edward Toussaint
A Tribute To Anne Simonett, Edward Toussaint
Faculty Scholarship
Tribute to Judge Anne Simonett, from Judge Edward Toussaint, Chief Judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals.
Innovations Disguised As Traditions: An Historical Review Of The Supreme Court Nominations Process, Ronald D. Rotunda
Innovations Disguised As Traditions: An Historical Review Of The Supreme Court Nominations Process, Ronald D. Rotunda
Law Faculty Articles and Research
No abstract provided.
Increasing Balance On The Federal Bench, Carl W. Tobias
Increasing Balance On The Federal Bench, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
In President Bill Clinton's first year of service, he nominated unprecedented numbers and percentages of highly qualified women and minorities to the federal judiciary. The Clinton Administration correspondingly employed an effective process for choosing potential jurists that generated relatively little controversy.
Some wondered whether President Clinton could improve his first year judicial selection record during his second year in office, especially given the number of international conflicts and pressing domestic matters that faced the Administration. These complications threatened to deflect the Administration's attention from naming judges.
Now that the 103d Congress has adjourned and President Clinton has reached mid-term, the …
An American Perspective On Environmental Impact Assessment In Australia, Mark Squillace
An American Perspective On Environmental Impact Assessment In Australia, Mark Squillace
Publications
No abstract provided.
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Articles
I grieve for my country to say that the administration of the criminal law in all the states in the Union (there may be one or two exceptions) is a disgrace to our civilization.
A Catalogue Of Judicial Federalism In The United States, Thomas E. Baker
A Catalogue Of Judicial Federalism In The United States, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Investiture Of The Honorable Paul Czajka, Roger J. Miner '56
Investiture Of The Honorable Paul Czajka, Roger J. Miner '56
Induction Ceremonies and Investitures
No abstract provided.
The Nomination Of Justice Brennan: Eisenhower's Mistake: A Look At The Historical Record, Stephen Wermiel
The Nomination Of Justice Brennan: Eisenhower's Mistake: A Look At The Historical Record, Stephen Wermiel
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Error In Closing Argument, H. Patrick Furman
Avoiding Error In Closing Argument, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law And The Inner Self, By Edward White., Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Book Review Of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law And The Inner Self, By Edward White., Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Using Common Sense: A Linguistic Perspective On Judicial Interpretations Of "Use A Firearm", Clark D. Cunningham, Charles J. Filmore
Using Common Sense: A Linguistic Perspective On Judicial Interpretations Of "Use A Firearm", Clark D. Cunningham, Charles J. Filmore
Faculty Publications By Year
No abstract provided.
Breakfast With Justice Blackmun, Sherry F. Colb
Breakfast With Justice Blackmun, Sherry F. Colb
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
We Can't Go On Together With Suspicious Minds: Judicial Bias And Racialized Perspective In R V Rds, Richard F. Devlin Frsc
We Can't Go On Together With Suspicious Minds: Judicial Bias And Racialized Perspective In R V Rds, Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In recent years it has been recognized that the Canadian judiciary has been drawn from only a relatively small cross section of the community, specifically privileged white males. As a result there have been calls for, and some action in pursuit of, appointment processes that are designed to diversify the bench in order to render it more inclusive. Gender and race are the two primary categories that are invoked as the benchmarks of diversity. While it would appear that numerically there seems to be some very modest progress towards the goal of achieving a more inclusive judiciary, significant qualitative, institutional …