Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Computer Law (111)
- Internet Law (111)
- Evidence (18)
- Science and Technology Law (11)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (9)
-
- Communications Law (7)
- Commercial Law (6)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Legal Remedies (5)
- Business (4)
- Contracts (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Privacy Law (4)
- Consumer Protection Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Economics (2)
- European Law (2)
- Industrial Organization (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Marketing Law (2)
- Other Law (2)
- Technology and Innovation (2)
- Institution
-
- Santa Clara Law (114)
- SelectedWorks (7)
- Fordham Law School (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- Selected Works (5)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- New York Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- BLR (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (114)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- NYLS Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- Intellectual Property Brief (3)
- James Grimmelmann (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (3)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (3)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (3)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Jonathan I. Ezor (2)
- Akron Intellectual Property Journal (1)
- Apostolos Chronopoulos (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (1)
- Deborah Brightman Morse (1)
- Frank A. Pasquale (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Ira Steven Nathenson (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Katrina Wu (1)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (1)
- Matthew Rimmer (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 179 of 179
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Intellectual Property And Americana, Or Why Ip Gets The Blues, Michael J. Madison
Intellectual Property And Americana, Or Why Ip Gets The Blues, Michael J. Madison
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 4 - Google Ad Partners All-Hands Q1 2008, Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 4 - Google Ad Partners All-Hands Q1 2008, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Ex. 20 - Email From Lena Huang, Lena Huang
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Ex. 20 - Email From Lena Huang, Lena Huang
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 8 - Email From Fiona Lee And Epcot Study (Google Online Operations), Fiona Lee
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 8 - Email From Fiona Lee And Epcot Study (Google Online Operations), Fiona Lee
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 66 - Deposition Of Larry Page From American Blind And Wallpaper V. Google (Google Co-Founder), Larry Page
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Social Networking Web Sites And The Dmca: A Safe-Harbor From Copyright Infringement Liability Or The Perfect Storm?, Jonathan J. Darrow, Gerald R. Ferrera
Social Networking Web Sites And The Dmca: A Safe-Harbor From Copyright Infringement Liability Or The Perfect Storm?, Jonathan J. Darrow, Gerald R. Ferrera
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Opting Out: Procedural Fair Use, Michael Mattioli
Opting Out: Procedural Fair Use, Michael Mattioli
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article explores the advantages of opt-out plans, and identifies a critical shortcoming in Copyright's doctrine of Fair Use. The discussion is fueled by a current controversy: In December of 2004, Google, Inc. announced its plan to digitally scan thousands of copyrighted books as part of a massive new digital indexing service. Hedging against possible litigation, Google provided a free and easy opt-out procedure for authors who didn't want their books scanned. Despite this measure, two major authors' groups have sued Google, claiming the opt-out plan imposes an unfair burden. This article explores the fairness of established opt-outs in contract …
Rescuecom Corp. V. Google, Inc., Arielle G. Lenza
Rescuecom Corp. V. Google, Inc., Arielle G. Lenza
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. J - Hagan Deposition From Cng (Google Managing Counsel - Trademarks), Rose Hagan
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. J - Hagan Deposition From Cng (Google Managing Counsel - Trademarks), Rose Hagan
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
The Half-Fairness Of Google's Plan To Make The World's Collection Of Books Searchable, Steven Hetcher
The Half-Fairness Of Google's Plan To Make The World's Collection Of Books Searchable, Steven Hetcher
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Google's major new initiative is to undertake the task of digitizing the world's collection of books so as to make them searchable. The very idea is audacious, but what is more so is that Google plans to copy without first seeking the permission of the owners of these works. Google Print would make available what is, by conventional measures at least, the highest grade of information--books produced by millions of the world's leading scholars. This is in stark contrast to the inconsistent quality spectrum one encounters through other online sources such as peer-to-peer networks and blogs, where there currently exists …
Fairly Used: Why Google’S Book Project Should Prevail Under The Fair Use Defense, Melanie Costantino
Fairly Used: Why Google’S Book Project Should Prevail Under The Fair Use Defense, Melanie Costantino
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 21 - Email From Lena Huang (Rosetta Online Marketing), Lena Huang
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 21 - Email From Lena Huang (Rosetta Online Marketing), Lena Huang
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Access To Knowledge As A Bridge Over The Troubled Waters Of Copyright Fair Use -- From Jefferson To Mandela To Google, Douglas L. Rogers
Access To Knowledge As A Bridge Over The Troubled Waters Of Copyright Fair Use -- From Jefferson To Mandela To Google, Douglas L. Rogers
ExpressO
The copyright fair use doctrine is a key to increasing access to knowledge and decreasing the digital divide between information-rich and information-poor countries. Publishers have sued Google for copyright infringement for scanning the copyrighted books of the publishers into a digital database, so Google users can search the database for certain words to determine what books contain words of interest to the user. The Google litigation, however, is only a small piece of the larger access to knowledge puzzle. The larger issue is access to the books themselves, translated into the native languages of citizens of developing countries. Yet copyright …
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 8 - Email From Emily White, Emily White
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 8 - Email From Emily White, Emily White
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Opting Out: Procedural Fair Use, Michael R. Mattioli
Opting Out: Procedural Fair Use, Michael R. Mattioli
ExpressO
This article explores the advantages of opt-out plans, and identifies a critical shortcoming in Copyright’s doctrine of Fair Use. The discussion is fueled by a current controversy: In December of 2004, Google, Inc. announced its plan to digitally scan thousands of copyrighted books as part of a massive new digital indexing service. Hedging against possible litigation, Google provided a free and easy opt-out procedure for authors who didn’t want their books scanned. Despite this measure, two major authors’ groups have sued Google, claiming the opt-out plan imposes an unfair burden. This article explores the fairness of established opt-outs in contract …
Rankings, Reductionism, And Responsibility, Frank Pasquale
Rankings, Reductionism, And Responsibility, Frank Pasquale
Faculty Scholarship
After discussing how search engines operate, and sketching a normative basis for regulation of the rankings they generate, this piece proposes some minor, non-intrusive legal remedies for those who claim that they are harmed by search engine results. Such harms include unwanted (but high-ranking) results relating to them, or exclusion from high-ranking results they claim they are due to appear on. In the first case (deemed inclusion harm), I propose a right not to suppress the results, but merely to add an asterisk to the hyperlink directing web users to them, which would lead to the complainant's own comment on …
Google's (Fair) Use Of Copyrighted Work, James Gibson
Google's (Fair) Use Of Copyrighted Work, James Gibson
Law Faculty Publications
Letters to the Editor on Google's (Fair) Use of Copyrighted Work
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 24 - Fax From Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 24 - Fax From Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Making A Mark In The Internet Economy: A Trademark Analysis Of Search Engine Advertising, Mark Bartholomew
Making A Mark In The Internet Economy: A Trademark Analysis Of Search Engine Advertising, Mark Bartholomew
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. I - Hagan Deposition From Geico (Google Managing Counsel - Trademarks), Rose Hagan
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. I - Hagan Deposition From Geico (Google Managing Counsel - Trademarks), Rose Hagan
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 58 - Deposition Of Rose Hagan From Geico V. Google (Google Managing Counsel Trademarks), Rose Hagan
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Viii, Tab 39 - Ex. 1 - Email From Lepe Bismarck, Lepe Bismarck
Vol. Viii, Tab 39 - Ex. 1 - Email From Lepe Bismarck, Lepe Bismarck
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex 6 - Google Three Ad Policy Changes, Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex 6 - Google Three Ad Policy Changes, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 40 - Document Tmprocess.Txt Trademark Meeting 3/4, Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 40 - Document Tmprocess.Txt Trademark Meeting 3/4, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 30 - Document Google Trademark Policy Task Force, Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 30 - Document Google Trademark Policy Task Force, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xxiii, Tab 60 - Ex. 7 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Vol. Xxiii, Tab 60 - Ex. 7 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 38 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 38 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Plus Ça Change. . . . How A French Court May Have Changed Internet Advertising Forever: Google France Fined For Selling Trademarked "Keywords", Brett August
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 5 - Google Advertising Policy Review, Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 5 - Google Advertising Policy Review, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?