Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UC Law SF (828)
- Fordham Law School (495)
- Seattle University School of Law (86)
- UIC School of Law (84)
- DePaul University (67)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (59)
- Pace University (45)
- University of Georgia School of Law (44)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (38)
- University of Washington School of Law (37)
- Pepperdine University (36)
- University of Michigan Law School (29)
- Marquette University Law School (20)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (15)
- Brooklyn Law School (13)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (9)
- University of Miami Law School (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- Duke Law (6)
- University of Kentucky (6)
- Florida International University College of Law (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (185)
- Trademark (65)
- Copyright infringement (57)
- Patent (54)
- Intellectual property (52)
-
- First Amendment (47)
- Copyright law (44)
- Internet (44)
- Sports (43)
- Fair use (42)
- Music (38)
- First amendment (31)
- Infringement (27)
- Lanham Act (26)
- Copyright Act (24)
- Antitrust (22)
- Free speech (22)
- Sound recordings (22)
- Right of publicity (20)
- Media (18)
- Technology (17)
- DMCA (15)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (15)
- Inc. (15)
- Piracy (15)
- Privacy (15)
- Berne Convention (14)
- Intellectual Property (14)
- TRIPS (14)
- Constitution (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (828)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (493)
- Seattle University Law Review (85)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (67)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (67)
-
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (57)
- Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum (44)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (39)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (36)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (33)
- Pepperdine Law Review (18)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (14)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (13)
- Cybaris® (12)
- Michigan Law Review (11)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (11)
- UIC Law Review (11)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (7)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review (7)
- University of Miami Business Law Review (7)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (6)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (6)
- Kentucky Law Journal (6)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (6)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (5)
- FIU Law Review (5)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Journal of Law and Policy (5)
- Marquette Sports Law Review (5)
Articles 2011 - 2030 of 2030
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Panel Discussion: What Are The Limitations On Freedom Of The Press, Daniel Schorr, Jesse H. Chopper, Sanford H. Kadish
Panel Discussion: What Are The Limitations On Freedom Of The Press, Daniel Schorr, Jesse H. Chopper, Sanford H. Kadish
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Daniel Schorr, a journalist long respected for his perceptivity and integrity, was recently the center of controversy when he made possible the publication of government documents not intended for public release. He discusses the continuing controversy between the public's right to know and the sixth amendment guarantee of the right to a fair trial, concluding that the courts have not adequately protected first amendment freedoms. Jesse Choper, noted constitutional scholar and author responds, illustrating case law highly protective of the freedom of the press. The authors agree that in special situations the public's right to know outbalances the right to …
Direct Broadcasting By Satellite: A Domestic And International Legal Controversy, Juliana Maio
Direct Broadcasting By Satellite: A Domestic And International Legal Controversy, Juliana Maio
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The United Nations is now considering two proposals to limit direct station-to-station television broadcasting via satellite. The Soviet proposal, which seems to be the more popular, would impose strict requirements on the broadcasting country to control the content of satellite broadcasts. The United States proposal calls for a system of co-operation consistent with its First Amendment. The author analyzes these positions, discussing the effect that adoption of the Soviet proposal would have on international law, and whether the United States would be constitutionally prohibited from adhering to it.
The Effect Of The 1976 Tax Reform Act On The Ownership Of Professional Sports Franchises, Charles Dickenson, Zook Sutton
The Effect Of The 1976 Tax Reform Act On The Ownership Of Professional Sports Franchises, Charles Dickenson, Zook Sutton
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
With the passage of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Congress severely restricted many of the tax advantages that came with the ownership of a professional sports franchise. The authors analyze in detail the effect of the new law, first discussing the benefits that had existed under prior law, then describing the method in which the Act changed the "rules of the game," and conclude with an indication of some tax planning for the future.
The Unfairness Doctrine - Balance And Response Over The Airwaves, Steven J. Simmons
The Unfairness Doctrine - Balance And Response Over The Airwaves, Steven J. Simmons
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The "fairness doctrine" requires broadcast licensees to devote a reasonable percentage of their programming to controversial issues of public importance, and to present contrasting viewpoints when such issues are aired. The author concentrates on the requirement to present contrasting viewpoints, discussing the case law and policy guidelines that have emerged and concluding that in its present form the doctrine operates unfairly to both viewers and broadcasters. He suggests specific proposals for improvement.
The Equal Opportunities And Fairness Doctrines In Broadcasting: Should They Be Retained, Roscoe L. Barrow
The Equal Opportunities And Fairness Doctrines In Broadcasting: Should They Be Retained, Roscoe L. Barrow
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The author recently testified in the current hearings conducted by the U.S. House Subcommittee on Communications in which repeal of the Equal Opportunities and Fairness Doctrines is being considered. In this article the author discusses the constitutional bases of these doctrines, the governmental action issue in the event of their repeal, and whether the Fairness Doctrine inhibits broadcast journalism. He suggests a differential equality of access solution to the present problem of application of the Equal Opportunities Doctrine and argues that the need of the people to know should continue to be a right through the Fairness Doctrine.
Newsmen's Shield Laws And Subpoenas: California's Farr And The Fresno Four, Albert G. Pickerell
Newsmen's Shield Laws And Subpoenas: California's Farr And The Fresno Four, Albert G. Pickerell
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The author discusses the impact of the Farr and Fresno Four decisions on the California Newsmen's Shield Law, Evidence Code § 1070. First the author discusses the history of shield laws, tracing the competing concerns with the newsman's "right to know" and the fair administration' of justice. He uses this background as a means of analyzing the meaning and scope of § 1070. Then the author turns'to the specific decisions in Farr and the Fresno Four, analyzing their impact on the shield law. He concludes with a look at the proposed constitutional amendment to reverse the results in the two …
Some Observations On The Copyright Law Of 1976: Not Everything Is Beautiful, Edward M. Cramer
Some Observations On The Copyright Law Of 1976: Not Everything Is Beautiful, Edward M. Cramer
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The author takes a careful look at the new Copyright Revision Act of 1976 from the perspective of writers and publishers of music. While finding much that is beneficial, the author concludes that further revision of the Copyright Act is necessary to fully protect performing artists.
The Film Collector, The Fbi, And The Copyright Act, Francis M. Nevins Jr.
The Film Collector, The Fbi, And The Copyright Act, Francis M. Nevins Jr.
Cleveland State Law Review
We are presently in the early middle stages of a media revolution which will reach its climax when films, in one form or another, will be found in people's homes and under consumers' control in much the same way as books and phonograph records. Although the availability of home videotaping equipment represents a giant step forward in the process, the revolution began long before the invention of the Betamax. For well over twenty years hobbyist film collectors, currently between 20,000 and 120,000 in number, have been purchasing sixteen and thirty-five millimeter prints of both copyrighted and public domain films, and …
The 1976 Copyright Act: Advances For The Creator, I. Fred Koenigsberg
The 1976 Copyright Act: Advances For The Creator, I. Fred Koenigsberg
Cleveland State Law Review
The 1976 Copyright Act represents a major advance for the creator. This is not to say that every provision is favorable to the creator. The new law is extremely complex, and the effects of many of its provisions are even now the subject of debate. The improvements of the new law over the 1909 Copyright Act are of such significance, however, as to justify its characterization by the Register of Copyrights as "an author's bill." This paper, based upon a panel discussion of the new law held at the Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts National Art Law Conference on December …
Copyright Pre-Emption And Character Values: The Paladin Case As An Extension Of Sears And Compco, Michigan Law Review
Copyright Pre-Emption And Character Values: The Paladin Case As An Extension Of Sears And Compco, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Much of the confusion over copyright pre-emption that has followed in the wake of Sears and Compco may be due to a fundamental difference between the present patent and copyright acts. Unlike the patent law that was at issue in Sears and Compco, the federal Copyright Act provides that the states may in limited circumstances protect literary property through the doctrine of common-law copyright. Under section 2 of the Act, a state may prevent copying of a work so long as it remains "unpublished." An alternative ground of decision in Paladin was that, regardless of preemption under Sears and …
Television Sponsor And Advertising Agency Held Vicariously Liable For Copyright Infringement--Davis V. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Michigan Law Review
Television Sponsor And Advertising Agency Held Vicariously Liable For Copyright Infringement--Davis V. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
DuPont sponsored a dramatization of Edith Wharton's novel Ethan Frome presented by the CBS television network. Petitioner claimed an infringement of his earlier copyrighted dramatization of the same novel and sought a declaration of liability against CBS, the producer of the program, DuPont, and its advertising agency, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc. (BBDO). Although DuPont and BBDO were notified before the performance of the possibility of copyright infringement liability and could have stopped the producers from using petitioner's play, they made no attempt to interfere. In petitioner's action in the federal district court, DuPont and BBDO contended that they …
Entertainment Title Duplication Cases: A Process Of Evolution
Entertainment Title Duplication Cases: A Process Of Evolution
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Is Choreography Copyrightable?: A Study Of The American And English Legal Interpretations Of "Drama", Robert Freedman
Is Choreography Copyrightable?: A Study Of The American And English Legal Interpretations Of "Drama", Robert Freedman
Duquesne Law Review
Dance, as well as music, may be reduced to writing. Movement may be recorded in Labanotation, which is a system of symbols by which the motion of each and every part of the human body, in its relationship to time and space, may be set down on paper. In 1952, Hanya Holm's labanotated choreographic score for the musical play, Kiss Me, Kate, was accepted by the United States Copyright Office for registration with a claim of copyright. Choreographic works may also be recorded by notation, symbols and diagrams different from the Laban system, drawings or pictures, or by language …
Literary And Artistic Property -- Common-Law Copyright-- Filing Of Architectural Plans In A Public Office As Publication, Judd L. Bacon S.Ed.
Literary And Artistic Property -- Common-Law Copyright-- Filing Of Architectural Plans In A Public Office As Publication, Judd L. Bacon S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff home designer prepared plans for a client and filed a copy in a county office as required by ordinance in order to obtain a building permit. Defendant copied and used these plans without plaintiff's consent. In an action under a state statute codifying the common-law right of designers to the exclusive ownership of their unpublished designs, the lower court held for defendant, finding plaintiff's copyright to have been destroyed by publication. On appeal, held, reversed. The filing of architectural plans in a public office in order to secure a building permit does not constitute a publication of them …
Copryright - Infringement - Parody Of Dramatic Production Held Not To Be Fair Use, William J. Wise S.Ed.
Copryright - Infringement - Parody Of Dramatic Production Held Not To Be Fair Use, William J. Wise S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Prior to December 1938, Patrick Hamilton wrote an original play entitled "Gaslight" which subsequently was published, performed and protected by copyright in both England and the United States. Loew's acquired exclusive motion picture rights to the play on October 7, 1942, and produced an original feature-length motion picture photoplay of the drama, also entitled "Gaslight." In 1945 Jack Benny sought and received permission to produce a 15-minute parody of the motion picture for his radio program. In 1953, without securing Loew's permission, Benny produced a 15-minute filmed parody of the motion picture for his television program. It was entitled "Autolight" …
Borderland - Where Copyright And Design Patent Meet, Richard W. Pogue
Borderland - Where Copyright And Design Patent Meet, Richard W. Pogue
Michigan Law Review
Copyright law and design patent law contemplate basically different objects of protection. Yet at the outer fringes of these types of protection certain concepts overlap to form a rather undefined borderland in which it is difficult to say what law is applicable-copyright law, patent law, neither, or both. It is the purpose of this paper to explore this borderland area in the light of traditional copyright and patent law principles, with attention given to policy considerations involved, and to offer suggestions toward drawing a sharper boundary between the two.
Copyright Law--Musical Style Piracy--Possible Methods Of Legal Protection For The Musical Stylist, John L. Young
Copyright Law--Musical Style Piracy--Possible Methods Of Legal Protection For The Musical Stylist, John L. Young
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Note And Comment, Gordon W. Stoner, Sigmund W. David, Victor R. Jose Jr.
Note And Comment, Gordon W. Stoner, Sigmund W. David, Victor R. Jose Jr.
Michigan Law Review
The Law School; Pleading Estoppel; Libels on Person and on Property; The Conflict Between a Patentee's Right to Monopoly and a State Anti-Monopoly Statute
Law Of Dramatic Copyright. Ii., Edward S. Rogers
Law Of Dramatic Copyright. Ii., Edward S. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
V. Dramatization of novels. - Continued. - Fortunately, we, in the United States, have had very little trouble in regard to the dramatization of novels. The copyright statute provides that the author of a copyrighted book may reserve the right to dramatize and translate his own work. There is no question, however, that but for this act which creates the additional right of dramatization and translation, the English rule would be in force in this country. The exclusive right of translating "Uncle Tom's Cabin" was denied Mrs. Stowe in Stowe v. Thomas, "decided before the enactment of the statute permitting …
The Law Of Dramatic Copyright, Edward S. Rogers
The Law Of Dramatic Copyright, Edward S. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
Literary Property at Common Law.--There have been few legal questions so generally and so fully discussed-as that relating to the property of authors in their. writings. Up to 1769, it was generally conceded that authors enjoyed, by virtue of the common law, a perpetual copyright, and copyrights were sold and made the basis of family settlements. In 1769, the great case of Millar v. Taylor, was decided. An action had been brought in 1766 to recover ior the piracy of "Thomson's Seasons," and it was held by a majority of the judges, Lord Mansfield, Mr. Justice Aston and Mr. Justice …