Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (48)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (19)
- Law and Race (13)
- Immigration Law (12)
- Legislation (10)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (9)
- Law and Politics (8)
- Courts (7)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Law and Society (7)
- Election Law (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Civil Law (3)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Education Law (3)
- Family Law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Juvenile Law (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- Campbell University School of Law (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Minnesota Law School (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (18)
- Due process (10)
- Fifth Amendment (7)
- Due Process Clause (6)
- Constitution (5)
-
- Equal protection (5)
- Immigration (5)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Due Process (4)
- Equal Protection Clause (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Citizenship (3)
- Civil rights (3)
- Deportation (3)
- Fifteenth Amendment (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Fourteenth amendment (3)
- Illegal immigrant (3)
- Immigration law (3)
- Race (3)
- Section 5 (3)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (3)
- 14th Amendment (2)
- Adjudication (2)
- Administrative judges (2)
- Administrative law (2)
- Administrative law judges (2)
- Congress (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (3)
-
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Brooklyn Law Review (2)
- Campbell Law Review (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Maryland Law Review (2)
- Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality (2)
- Publications (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- ConLawNOW (1)
- Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- GGU Law Review Blog (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Holning Lau (1)
- Journal of Legislation (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 75 of 75
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
The Minor Donor-Sibling Dilemma: Are Bone Marrow Donation Decisions Up To The Parent Or The Child?, Christina Carone
The Minor Donor-Sibling Dilemma: Are Bone Marrow Donation Decisions Up To The Parent Or The Child?, Christina Carone
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Show Me Your Papers”: An Equal Protection Violation Of The Rights Of Latino Men In Trump’S America, Monica Chawla
“Show Me Your Papers”: An Equal Protection Violation Of The Rights Of Latino Men In Trump’S America, Monica Chawla
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Did The African-American Electorate Unintentionally Help Elect Donald Trump President?, C. Daniel Chill
Did The African-American Electorate Unintentionally Help Elect Donald Trump President?, C. Daniel Chill
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trump Anti-Trans Regs Vulnerable To Challenge, Arthur S. Leonard
Trump Anti-Trans Regs Vulnerable To Challenge, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Non-Alj Adjudicators In Federal Agencies: Status, Selection, Oversight, And Removal, Kent H. Barnett, Russell Wheeler
Non-Alj Adjudicators In Federal Agencies: Status, Selection, Oversight, And Removal, Kent H. Barnett, Russell Wheeler
Scholarly Works
This article republishes—in substantively similar form—our 2018 report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) concerning federal agencies’ adjudicators who are not administrative law judges (ALJs). (We refer to these adjudicators as “non-ALJ Adjudicators” or “non-ALJs.”) As our data indicate, non-ALJs significantly outnumber ALJs. Yet non-ALJs are often overlooked and difficult to discuss as a class because of their disparate titles and characteristics. To obtain more information on non-ALJs, we surveyed agencies on non-ALJs’ hearings and, among other things, the characteristics concerning non-ALJs’ salaries, selection, oversight, and removal. We first present our reported data on these matters, which …
Judicial Review Of Disproportionate (Or Retaliatory) Deportation, Jason A. Cade
Judicial Review Of Disproportionate (Or Retaliatory) Deportation, Jason A. Cade
Scholarly Works
This Article focuses attention on two recent and notable federal court opinions considering challenges to Trump administration deportation decisions. While finding no statutory bar to the noncitizens’ detention and deportation in these cases, the court in each instance paused to highlight the injustice of the removal decisions. This Article places the opinions in the context of emerging immigration enforcement trends, which reflect a growing indifference to disproportionate treatment as well as enforcement actions founded on retaliation for the exercise of constitutional rights. Judicial decisions like the ones considered here serve vital functions in the cause of immigration law reform even …
Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tell Us About The Supreme Court's Use Of Social Science, Jonathan Feingold, Evelyn Carter
Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tell Us About The Supreme Court's Use Of Social Science, Jonathan Feingold, Evelyn Carter
Faculty Scholarship
In McCleskey v. Kemp, the Supreme Court rendered statistical evidence of racial disparities doctrinally irrelevant to a criminal defendant’s equal protection claim. Fifteen years later in Grutter v. Bollinger, Chief Justice Rehnquist—part of the McCleskey majority—invoked admissions data to support his conclusion that the University of Michigan Law School had unconstitutionally discriminated against White applicants. This facially inconsistent treatment of statistical data invites the following inquiry: Why do judges (including Supreme Court Justices) rely on social science in some cases, yet reject it in others? We suggest that one answer lies at the intersection of Critical Race Theory and empirical …
Privacy's Double Standards, Scott Skinner-Thompson
Privacy's Double Standards, Scott Skinner-Thompson
Publications
Where the right to privacy exists, it should be available to all people. If not universally available, then privacy rights should be particularly accessible to marginalized individuals who are subject to greater surveillance and are less able to absorb the social costs of privacy violations. But in practice, there is evidence that people of privilege tend to fare better when they bring privacy tort claims than do non-privileged individuals. This disparity occurs despite doctrine suggesting that those who occupy prominent and public social positions are entitled to diminished privacy tort protections.
This Article unearths disparate outcomes in public disclosure tort …
Undocumented Citizens Of The United States: The Repercussions Of Denying Birth Certificates, Anna L. Lichtenberger
Undocumented Citizens Of The United States: The Repercussions Of Denying Birth Certificates, Anna L. Lichtenberger
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Finality Of A Conviction: A Noncitizen's Right To Procedural Due Process, Daniela Mondragon
Finality Of A Conviction: A Noncitizen's Right To Procedural Due Process, Daniela Mondragon
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
A "Chinese Wall" At The Nation's Borders: Justice Stephen Field And The Chinese Exclusion Case, Polly J. Price
A "Chinese Wall" At The Nation's Borders: Justice Stephen Field And The Chinese Exclusion Case, Polly J. Price
Faculty Articles
First, the sweeping implications of The Chinese Exclusion Case had as much to do with the Supreme Court's concerns about its relationship with both Congress and the President as it did with the Chinese as a disparaged racial group. There are other dimensions beyond race, and one of these was the Supreme Court's view of its role with respect to the other branches of government. Importantly, the Court did not decide the balance of authority between the President and Congress on matters of immigration, an omission that surely lessens its precedential value today.
Second, the Court's pronouncement in the Chinese …
Teaching The Transformative Fourteenth Amendment, Joel K. Goldstein
Teaching The Transformative Fourteenth Amendment, Joel K. Goldstein
All Faculty Scholarship
If the constitutional law casebooks are a reliable guide, most teach the Fourteenth Amendment, like other parts of the Constitution, by presenting separately the various doctrinal topics it has raised.[1] The principal clauses of the Amendment, or really those in the second sentence of Section 1[2]—the Equal Protection, Due Process, and Privileges or Immunities Clauses—are generally extracted from its text and classes are structured around the leading cases decided under each and the resulting doctrine. Cases under the Equal Protection or Due Process Clause may be further separated. Based on the class of claimants, for instance, the cases involving racial …
Remedies And The Government's Constitutionally Harmful Speech, Helen Norton
Remedies And The Government's Constitutionally Harmful Speech, Helen Norton
Publications
Although governments have engaged in expression from their inception, only recently have we begun to consider the ways in which the government’s speech sometimes threatens our constitutional rights. In my contribution to this symposium, I seek to show that although the search for constitutional remedies for the government’s harmful expression is challenging, it is far from futile. This search is also increasingly important at a time when the government’s expressive powers continue to grow—along with its willingness to use these powers for disturbing purposes and with troubling consequences.
More specifically, in certain circumstances, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or damages can …
Citizens Of The State, Maeve Glass
Citizens Of The State, Maeve Glass
Faculty Scholarship
According to conventional wisdom, state citizenship emerged out of the localism of early America and gave way to national citizenship with the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. This Article offers a different account of state citizenship and, with it, new resources for analyzing the Constitution. It argues that far from a primordial category that receded into irrelevance, state citizenship provided a crucial strategic tool in America’s antislavery movement, as abolitionist lawyers used the label of state citizenship to build a coalition with white elites by reframing the issue of slavery from the rights of a black person to the sovereignty …
From Loving To Obergefell: Elevating The Significance Of Discriminatory Effects, Holning Lau