Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Juvenile Law (2)
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Construction Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Taxation-Transnational (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- 14th amendment (2)
- Arkansas (2)
- Children (2)
- Courts (2)
-
- Due process (2)
- Juvenile (2)
- Arnett v. Kennedy (1)
- Asylum (1)
- Bar Association (1)
- Blue law (1)
- Board of Regents v. Roth (1)
- Child (1)
- Christianity (1)
- Church and state (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Court (1)
- Criminal offense (1)
- Delinquency (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Education of the Handicapped Act (1)
- Employment termination (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Equal protection doctrine (1)
- Family autonomy (1)
- Federal (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Foreigners (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Race And The Decision To Detain A Suspect, Sheri Johnson
Race And The Decision To Detain A Suspect, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Hawaii Tax Held Invalid: Court Decides First Case Of The Term, Patricia D. White
Hawaii Tax Held Invalid: Court Decides First Case Of The Term, Patricia D. White
Articles
Aloha Airlines, Inc.
v.
Director of Taxation, State of Hawaii (Docket No. 82-585)
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
v.
Director of Taxation, State of Hawaii (Docket No. 82-566)
Argued October 4. 1983. Decided November 1, 1983
Schall V. Martin, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Smith V. Robinson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Arkansas Juvenile Courts: Do Lay Judges Satisfy Due Process In Delinquency Cases, Paula J. Casey
Arkansas Juvenile Courts: Do Lay Judges Satisfy Due Process In Delinquency Cases, Paula J. Casey
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Due Process—Arkansas' Sunday Closing Law Is Declared Unconstitutionally Vague, Charles L. Kennon Iii
Constitutional Law—Due Process—Arkansas' Sunday Closing Law Is Declared Unconstitutionally Vague, Charles L. Kennon Iii
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Taking” A Constitutional Look At The State Bar Of Texas Proposal To Collect Interest On Attorney-Client Trust Accounts, Thomas E. Baker, Robert E. Wood Jr.
“Taking” A Constitutional Look At The State Bar Of Texas Proposal To Collect Interest On Attorney-Client Trust Accounts, Thomas E. Baker, Robert E. Wood Jr.
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
How Are You Going To Keep Them Down On The (Collective) Farm After They’Ve Seen Chicago?: A Minor’S Right To Political Asylum Against His Parents’ Wishes, Michael G. Hillinger
How Are You Going To Keep Them Down On The (Collective) Farm After They’Ve Seen Chicago?: A Minor’S Right To Political Asylum Against His Parents’ Wishes, Michael G. Hillinger
Faculty Publications
“Children’s rights” is a nebulous phrase subsuming two very different issues: the extent to which children can assert the same rights against the state as adults, and the extent to which the state can limit a parent’s power over his child. In cases involving the issue of children’s rights , the Supreme Court has defined those rights in a relatively restrictive fashion. On the one hand, the Supreme Court has recognized that children have constitutional rights independent of those enjoyed by their parents. On the other hand, it has frequently held those rights to be either less than those afforded …
A Reassessment Of The Younger Doctrine In Light Of The Legislative History Of Reconstruction, Donald H. Zeigler
A Reassessment Of The Younger Doctrine In Light Of The Legislative History Of Reconstruction, Donald H. Zeigler
Articles & Chapters
Recently the Supreme Court extended the doctrine of Younger v. Harris to preclude federal court reform of state criminal and civil justice systems. In this article, Professor Zeigler argues that Younger and its progeny directly contravene the intent of the Reconstruction Congresses that adopted the fourteenth amendment and enacted numerous pieces of enforcement legislation. His research demonstrates that these Congresses intended the federal courts to be the primary enforcer of Reconstruction reform measures. Professor Ziegler concludes that the federal courts are neglecting their duty to enforce constitutional safeguards in state justice systems.
Liberty And Property In The Supreme Court: A Defense Of Roth And Perry, Peter N. Simon
Liberty And Property In The Supreme Court: A Defense Of Roth And Perry, Peter N. Simon
Publications
No abstract provided.