Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (167)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (109)
- Law and Society (69)
- Courts (47)
- Human Rights Law (42)
-
- Jurisprudence (40)
- Law and Politics (38)
- Criminal Law (35)
- Criminal Procedure (34)
- Legal History (34)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (33)
- First Amendment (31)
- Judges (31)
- Sexuality and the Law (31)
- Education Law (25)
- Law and Gender (23)
- State and Local Government Law (19)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (18)
- Fourth Amendment (18)
- Immigration Law (18)
- Jurisdiction (18)
- Social Welfare Law (18)
- Family Law (17)
- Legislation (17)
- Religion Law (17)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (16)
- Health Law and Policy (15)
- Labor and Employment Law (14)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (92)
- Constitutional Law (81)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (49)
- Law and Society (44)
- Jurisprudence (27)
-
- Politics (27)
- Courts (26)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (24)
- Due process (21)
- Equal protection (21)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (20)
- Legal History (20)
- Fourteenth amendment (19)
- Judges (19)
- First Amendment (18)
- Human Rights Law (17)
- Constitutional law (15)
- Legislation (13)
- Education Law (12)
- Equal Protection (11)
- Sexuality and the Law (11)
- Constitutional Law, Generally (10)
- General Law (10)
- State and Local Government Law (10)
- Women (10)
- Civil Law (9)
- Civil Rights (9)
- Discrimination (9)
- Domestic Relations (9)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Adam Lamparello (15)
- Michele Carducci Prof. (7)
- Sheri Lynn Johnson (5)
- Tanya Monique Washington (5)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (4)
-
- Melissa R Hart (4)
- Michael Heise (4)
- Sherry Colb (4)
- Victor C. Romero (4)
- Nancy C Marcus (3)
- Richard Broughton (3)
- Ryan Williams (3)
- Stephen E Henderson (3)
- Aaron J Shuler (2)
- Andrew T. Hyman (2)
- Arianne Renan Barzilay Dr. (J.S.D., New York University School of Law) (2)
- Carlo A. Pedrioli (2)
- Christopher S. Elmendorf (2)
- Corey A Ciocchetti (2)
- Daniel A Farber (2)
- Daniel J.H. Greenwood (2)
- Darren L Hutchinson (2)
- Donald L. Beschle (2)
- Emily L Sherwin (2)
- Gabriel Neff (2)
- Holning Lau (2)
- Kim D. Chanbonpin (2)
- Lawrence Rosenthal (2)
- Michael C. Dorf (2)
- Rachel Claire Zoghlin (2)
Articles 211 - 214 of 214
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Policing And Equal Protection, Lawrence Rosenthal
Policing And Equal Protection, Lawrence Rosenthal
Lawrence Rosenthal
For urban policing, it is the best of times and the worst of times. The innovative and proactive policing techniques that have come into widespread use over the past decade -- sometimes referred to as the "New Policing" -- are credited by many with producing significant reductions in urban crime. The vocal and numerous critics of these tactics, however, claim that the cure has been worse than the disease, by imposing enormous and unwarranted burdens on high crime minority communities where use of these new tactics is concentrated. In this paper, I offer a defense for New Policing as faithful …
Revisiting Gay Rights Coalition Of Georgetown Law Center V. Georgetown University A Decade Later: Free Exercise Challenges And The Nondiscrimination Laws Protecting Homosexuals, Matthew J. Parlow
Matthew Parlow
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
THIS PAPER IS THE CO-WINNER OF THE FRED BERGER PRIZE IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW FOR THE 1999 AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BEST PUBLISHED PAPER IN THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS.
The conflict between liberal legal theory and critical legal studies (CLS) is often framed as a matter of whether there is a theory of justice that the law should embody which all rational people could or must accept. In a divided society, the CLS critique of this view is overwhelming: there is no such justice that can command universal assent. But the liberal critique of CLS, that it degenerates into …
Substantive Due Process In The Twilight Zone: Protecting Property Interests From Arbitrary Land Use Decisions, Stewart M. Wiener
Substantive Due Process In The Twilight Zone: Protecting Property Interests From Arbitrary Land Use Decisions, Stewart M. Wiener
Stewart M. Wiener
Substantive due process protection of the property rights of landowners against arbitrary government decisionmaking is integral to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Federal courts have taken divergent paths in addressing the nature of the property interest required to state a substantive due process claim, and the standard by which arbitrary and capricious government conduct is evaluated. Under substantive due process, an allegation of arbitrary government conduct should be evaluated under a meaningful standard, rather than the unthinking deference of the rational basis test. Strong protection of property interests protects the civil rights of individuals, rather than protecting …