Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Scholarly Articles (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Articles (4)
- Publications (4)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Journal Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (1)
Articles 31 - 42 of 42
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Bolling Alone, Richard A. Primus
Bolling Alone, Richard A. Primus
Articles
Under the doctrine of reverse incorporation, generally identified with the Supreme Court's decision in Bolling v. Sharpe, equal protection binds the federal government even though the Equal Protection Clause by its terms is addressed only to states. Since Bolling, however, the courts have almost never granted relief to litigants claiming unconstitutional racial discrimination by the federal government. Courts have periodically found unconstitutional federal discrimination on nonracial grounds such as sex and alienage, and reverse incorporation has also limited the scope of affirmative action. But in the presumed core area of preventing federal discrimination against racial minorities, Boiling has virtually no …
Decoupling 'Terrorist' From 'Immigrant': An Enhanced Role For The Federal Courts Post 9/11, Victor C. Romero
Decoupling 'Terrorist' From 'Immigrant': An Enhanced Role For The Federal Courts Post 9/11, Victor C. Romero
Journal Articles
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft has utilized the broad immigration power ceded to him by Congress to ferret out terrorists among noncitizens detained for minor immigration violations. Such a strategy provides the government two options: deport those who are not terrorists, and then prosecute others who are. While certainly efficient, using immigration courts and their less formal due process protections afforded noncitizens should trigger greater oversight and vigilance by the federal courts for at least four reasons: First, while the legitimate goal of immigration law enforcement is deportation, Ashcroft's true objective in targeting …
Conceptualizing Constitutional Litigation As Anti-Government Expression: A Speech-Centered Theory Of Court Access, Robert L. Tsai
Conceptualizing Constitutional Litigation As Anti-Government Expression: A Speech-Centered Theory Of Court Access, Robert L. Tsai
Faculty Scholarship
This Article proposes a speech-based right of court access. First, it finds the traditional due process approach to be analytically incoherent and of limited practical value. Second, it contends that history, constitutional structure, and theory all support conceiving of the right of access as the modern analogue to the right to petition government for redress. Third, the Article explores the ways in which the civil rights plaintiff's lawsuit tracks the behavior of the traditional dissident. Fourth, by way of a case study, the essay argues that recent restrictions - notably, a congressional limitation on the amount of fees counsel for …
Due Process, Jurisdiction And A Hague Judgments Convention, Ronald A. Brand
Due Process, Jurisdiction And A Hague Judgments Convention, Ronald A. Brand
Articles
Due process is perhaps one of the most misunderstood concepts in the U.S. legal system, especially as it appears to those outside the United States. For lawyers trained in the United States, 'due process' becomes a phrase with special meaning resulting from the study of a number of judicial decisions, especially those of the U.S. Supreme Court. For lay persons, and for lawyers from other countries, discussions of 'due process' may not always provide a clear understanding of what that phrase means in the U.S. legal system. This paper discusses the historical development of the concept of due process in …
Freedom From Incarceration: Why Is This Right Different From All Other Rights?, Sherry F. Colb
Freedom From Incarceration: Why Is This Right Different From All Other Rights?, Sherry F. Colb
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
American constitutional jurisprudence has long accepted the notion that the exercise of certain rights can only be restricted by the government if the restriction satisfies strict scrutiny. The Supreme Court has identified such rights as fundamental often by relying on an expansive interpretation of the word "liberty" in the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. In this Article, Professor Colb argues that the Supreme Court has failed to recognize the right to physical liberty itself as a fundamental right. She demonstrates that at present conduct that is not itself constitutionally protected may serve as the basis for imprisonment even …
The Constitutionality Of Enjoining Criminal Street Gangs As Public Nuisances, Christopher S. Yoo
The Constitutionality Of Enjoining Criminal Street Gangs As Public Nuisances, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
California jurisdictions have increasingly used injunctions to combat the growth criminal street gangs. The use of civil sanctions to redress criminal activity raises difficult constitutional questions, potentially creating personal criminal codes that may infringe upon defendants’ substantive constitutional rights. In addition, employing civil remedies may deprive defendants of constitutional procedural protections that would have been provided if the jurisdiction had elected to deter the same behavior with available criminal sanctions. Although the use of injunctions places pressure on a number of substantive constitutional rights, including the freedom of association, freedom of expression, right to travel, the injunction terms will likely …
Taking The Framers Seriously, William Michael Treanor
Taking The Framers Seriously, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article reviews Taking the Constitution Seriously by Walter Berns (1987).
This review focuses on three of the key historical points that Walter Berns makes: his arguments that the Declaration of Independence is a Lockean document; that the Constitution encapsulates the political philosophy of the Declaration; and that the framers viewed the commercialization of society as a salutary development and were unambivalent champions of the right to property. Examination of these issues suggests that the ideological universe of the framers was far more complex than Berns indicates. While the revolutionary era witnessed a new concern with individual rights and a …
Judicial Review In Local Government Law: A Reappraisal, Harold H. Bruff
Judicial Review In Local Government Law: A Reappraisal, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ex-Convict's Right To Vote, David H. Getches
The Blaine Amendment And The Bill Of Rights, Alfred W. Meyer
The Blaine Amendment And The Bill Of Rights, Alfred W. Meyer
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Persistence Of Substantive Due Process In The States, Monrad G. Paulsen
The Persistence Of Substantive Due Process In The States, Monrad G. Paulsen
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.