Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (29)
- Criminal Procedure (12)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Litigation (6)
- Science and Technology Law (6)
-
- Courts (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Law and Psychology (5)
- Torts (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- International Law (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Legal Studies (3)
- Medical Jurisprudence (3)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Juvenile Law (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Africana Studies (1)
- Institution
-
- The University of Akron (19)
- Selected Works (13)
- SelectedWorks (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
-
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Akron Law Review (19)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (3)
- barbara p billauer esq (3)
- Alex Stein (2)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Robert M. Sanger (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- University of Baltimore Law Forum (2)
- Andrea D. Lyon (1)
- Anne Wallace Professor (1)
- Articles (1)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Contributions to Books (1)
- Curtis E.A. Karnow (1)
- David S Caudill (1)
- Eleanor Swift (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- James H. Seckinger (1)
- Julia Simon-Kerr (1)
- Keith A Findley (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Michael Heise (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 73 of 73
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Tell Us A Story But Don’T Make It A Good One: Embracing The Tension Regarding Emotional Stories And The Federal Rule Of Evidence 403, Cathren Koehlert-Page
Tell Us A Story But Don’T Make It A Good One: Embracing The Tension Regarding Emotional Stories And The Federal Rule Of Evidence 403, Cathren Koehlert-Page
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Texas Rules Of Evidence: Something Old, Something New, And Something Changed, David A. Schlueter
The Texas Rules Of Evidence: Something Old, Something New, And Something Changed, David A. Schlueter
Faculty Articles
On November 19, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court issued an Order amending all of the Texas Rules of Evidence, effective April 1, 2015. In its Order, the Court explained that the amendments were part of an effort to “restyle” the Rules, to make them as consistent as possible with the Federal Rules of Evidence, and to make them easier to understand.
The 2015 amendments to the Texas Rules of Evidence are a commendable step toward making the Rules more user-friendly. It is clear to even the casual reader that the reformatting of the Rules, through the use of consistent and …
The Promises And Pitfalls Of State Eyewitness Identification Reforms, Nicholas A. Kahn-Fogel
The Promises And Pitfalls Of State Eyewitness Identification Reforms, Nicholas A. Kahn-Fogel
Faculty Scholarship
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of state-based eyewitness identification reforms, including legislative directives, evidentiary rules, and judicial interpretations of state constitutions as providing greater protection against the use of unreliable eyewitness evidence than the United State Supreme Court offered in its 1977 decision in Manson v. Brathwaite. While previous scholarship has included thorough consideration of a single state's eyewitness law, state-by-state analysis of a sub-issue in eyewitness law, and brief general surveys of state approaches to eyewitness reform, this article adds to the current body of scholarship with an in-depth evaluation of eyewitness identification law in states that have …
Panel 3: Chronic Pain, Psychogenic Pain, And Emotion, Robert Dinerstein
Panel 3: Chronic Pain, Psychogenic Pain, And Emotion, Robert Dinerstein
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Neuroprediction: New Technology, Old Problems, Stephen J. Morse
Neuroprediction: New Technology, Old Problems, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
Neuroprediction is the use of structural or functional brain or nervous system variables to make any type of prediction, including medical prognoses and behavioral forecasts, such as an indicator of future dangerous behavior. This commentary will focus on behavioral predictions, but the analysis applies to any context. The general thesis is that using neurovariables for prediction is a new technology, but that it raises no new ethical issues, at least for now. Only if neuroscience achieves the ability to “read” mental content will genuinely new ethical issues be raised, but that is not possible at present.
Using The Dna Testing Of Arrestees To Reevaluate Fourth Amendment Doctrine, Steven P. Grossman
Using The Dna Testing Of Arrestees To Reevaluate Fourth Amendment Doctrine, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
With the advent of DNA testing, numerous issues have arisen with regard to obtaining and using evidence developed from such testing. As courts have come to regard DNA testing as a reliable method for linking some people to crimes and for exonerating others, these issues are especially significant. The federal government and most states have enacted statutes that permit or direct the testing of those convicted of at least certain crimes. Courts have almost universally approved such testing, rejecting arguments that obtaining and using such evidence violates the Fourth Amendment.
More recently governments have enacted laws permitting or directing the …
Storming The Castle: Fernandez V. California And The Waning Warrant Requirement, Joshua Bornstein
Storming The Castle: Fernandez V. California And The Waning Warrant Requirement, Joshua Bornstein
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sonic Jihad — Muslim Hip Hop In The Age Of Mass Incarceration, Spearit
Sonic Jihad — Muslim Hip Hop In The Age Of Mass Incarceration, Spearit
Articles
This essay examines hip hop music as a form of legal criticism. It focuses on the music as critical resistance and “new terrain” for understanding the law, and more specifically, focuses on what prisons mean to Muslim hip hop artists. Losing friends, family, and loved ones to the proverbial belly of the beast has inspired criticism of criminal justice from the earliest days of hip hop culture. In the music, prisons are known by a host of names like “pen,” “bing,” and “clink,” terms that are invoked throughout the lyrics. The most extreme expressions offer violent fantasies of revolution and …
Managing Big Data In Complex Litigation, Robert Sanger
Managing Big Data In Complex Litigation, Robert Sanger
Robert M. Sanger
Any lawyer doing complex litigation, civil or criminal, has confronted what seems like an insurmountable sea of data. Many of us have used computer relational database programs and otherwise fought through the mass of information to prepare to try a case. There have been some advancements in managing data made by law enforcement in recent years to make their investigations manageable. During law enforcement investigations, the goal is somewhat different than that of the lawyer preparing for trial; however, the concepts are useful.
Systemic Lying, Julia Simon-Kerr
Systemic Lying, Julia Simon-Kerr
Julia Simon-Kerr
This Article offers the foundational account of systemic lying from a definitional and theoretical perspective. Systemic lying involves the cooperation of multiple actors in the legal system who lie or violate their oaths across cases for a consistent reason that is linked to their conception of justice. It becomes a functioning mechanism within the legal system and changes the operation of the law as written. By identifying systemic lying, this Article challenges the assumption that all lying in the legal system is the same. It argues that systemic lying poses a particular threat to the legal system. This means that …
Inefficient Evidence, Alex Stein
Inefficient Evidence, Alex Stein
Alex Stein
Why set up evidentiary rules rather than allow factfinders to make decisions by considering all relevant evidence? This fundamental question has been the subject of unresolved controversy among scholars and policymakers since it was raised by Bentham at the beginning of the nineteenth century. This Article offers a surprisingly straightforward answer: An economically minded legal system must suppress all evidence that brings along a negative productivity-expense balance and is therefore inefficient. Failure to suppress inefficient evidence will result in serious diseconomies of scale. To operationalize this idea, I introduce a “signal-to-noise” method borrowed from statistics, science, and engineering. This method …
The New Doctrinalism: Implications For Evidence Theory, Alex Stein
The New Doctrinalism: Implications For Evidence Theory, Alex Stein
Alex Stein
This Article revisits and refines the organizing principles of evidence law: case specificity, cost minimization, and equal best. These three principles explain and justify all admissibility and sufficiency requirements of the law of evidence. The case-specificity principle requires that factfinders base their decisions on the relative plausibility of the stories describing the parties’ entitlement–accountability relationship. The cost-minimization principle demands that factfinders minimize the cost of errors and the cost of avoiding errors as a total sum. The equal-best principle mandates that factfinders afford every person the maximal feasible protection against risk of error while equalizing that protection across the board. …
Law, Science, And The Economy: One Domain?, David S. Caudill
Law, Science, And The Economy: One Domain?, David S. Caudill
David S Caudill
In an effort to explore the theoretical and practical promise of ignoring or erasing conventional boundaries and distinctions—such as law/society or inside/outside—in accounts of legal processes and institutions, I consider the problem of financial bias in scientific expertise. I first draw an analogy with science studies, and particularly Latour’s notion of science as a coproduction, which challenges the boundaries (i) between science and society, and (ii) between natural and social influences on the production of scientific knowledge. I then acknowledge the efforts of Philip Mirowski, in his concern that privatization trends degrade science, to overcome an individualistic perspective on financial …