Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. (1)
- Attenuation exception (1)
- Class certification (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Confessiona (1)
-
- Counterfactual evidence (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Due process (1)
- Employment law (1)
- Exclusionary principles (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- FRCP (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Mathews v. Eldridge (1)
- Mezzanatto (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Overcharging (1)
- Overcriminalization (1)
- Overincarceration (1)
- Plea bargaining (1)
- Police (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Rules of Evidence (1)
- Salinas v. Texas (1)
- Searches (1)
- Seizures (1)
- Self-incrimination (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Miranda Case Fifty Years Later, Yale Kamisar
The Miranda Case Fifty Years Later, Yale Kamisar
Articles
A decade after the Supreme Court decided Miranda v. Arizona, Geoffrey Stone took a close look at the eleven decisions the Court had handed down “concerning the scope and application of Miranda.” As Stone observed, “[i]n ten of these cases, the Court interpreted Miranda so as not to exclude the challenged evidence.” In the eleventh case, the Court excluded the evidence on other grounds. Thus, Stone noted, ten years after the Court decided the case, “the Court ha[d] not held a single item of evidence inadmissible on the authority of Miranda.” Not a single item. To use …
Illegal Stops And The Exclusionary Rule: The Consequences Of Utah V. Strieff, Emily Sack
Illegal Stops And The Exclusionary Rule: The Consequences Of Utah V. Strieff, Emily Sack
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
"Make Him An Offer He Can't Refuse"-- Mezzanatto Waivers As Lynchpin Of Prosecutorial Overreach, Christopher B. Mueller
"Make Him An Offer He Can't Refuse"-- Mezzanatto Waivers As Lynchpin Of Prosecutorial Overreach, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
Plea bargaining is the dominant means of disposing of criminal charges in the United States, in both state and federal courts. This administrative mechanism has become a system that is grossly abusive of individual rights, leading to many well-known maladies of the criminal justice system, which include overcharging, overincarceration, convictions on charges that would likely fail at trial, and even conviction of “factually innocent” persons. Instrumental in the abuses of plea bargaining is the so-called Mezzanatto waiver, which takes its name from a 1995 Supreme Court decision that approved the practice of getting defendants to agree that anything they say …
The Triangle Of Law And The Role Of Evidence In Class Action Litigation, Jonah B. Gelbach
The Triangle Of Law And The Role Of Evidence In Class Action Litigation, Jonah B. Gelbach
All Faculty Scholarship
In Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo, a "donning and doffing" case brought under Iowa state law incorporating the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime pay provisions, the petitioners asked the Supreme Court to reject the use of statistical evidence in Rule 23(b)(3) class certification. To its great credit, the Court refused. In its majority opinion, the Court cited both the Federal Rules of Evidence and federal common law interpreting the FLSA. In this paper, I take a moderately deep dive into the facts of the case, and the three opinions penned by Justice Kennedy (for the Court), Chief Justice Roberts (in …