Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (63)
- Litigation (59)
- Scientific (7)
- Hearsay (6)
- Ohio (5)
-
- Polygraph (5)
- Character (4)
- Forensic Science (4)
- Science (4)
- Scientific Evidence (4)
- Testimony (4)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Daubert (3)
- Expert (3)
- Public Institutions (3)
- Best Evidence (2)
- Chain of Custody (2)
- DNA (2)
- Expert Testimony (2)
- Experts (2)
- Forensic science (2)
- Junk science (2)
- National Academy of Sciences (2)
- Other Acts (2)
- Scientific evidence (2)
- "conditional probative value" (1)
- "shopping" for an expert (1)
- A Path Forward (1)
- Administration (1)
- Admissibility (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 95
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Are Prosecutorial Ethics Standards Different?, Kevin C. Mcmunigal
Are Prosecutorial Ethics Standards Different?, Kevin C. Mcmunigal
Faculty Publications
Once a prosecutor determines to employ an expert, a number of distinct decisions must be confronted-from choosing the expert, to complying with discovery obligations, to presenting the testimony at trial. Part I of this essay considers the selection of experts. Although improper selection of experts can be viewed as merely another aspect of presenting misleading testimony, we treat it separately in this essay because the literature typically ignores it. Part 1I examines the pretrial disclosure of scientific evidence. The issues that have arisen in this context include late disclosure, omitting information from laboratory reports, declining to have a report prepared, …
New Developments In Scientific Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
New Developments In Scientific Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Impeachment: Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Impeachment: Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Daubert In The States, Paul C. Giannelli
Hearsay: Traps & Problem Issues, Paul C. Giannelli
Hearsay: Traps & Problem Issues, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Rape Trauma Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli
Rape Trauma Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
Article discusses use of rape trauma syndrom in litigation.
Chain Of Custody, Paul C. Giannelli
The After-Acquired Evidence Rule: The Best Of All Possible Worlds?, Sharona Hoffman
The After-Acquired Evidence Rule: The Best Of All Possible Worlds?, Sharona Hoffman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Seizing Evidence From Suspects For Forensic Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli
Seizing Evidence From Suspects For Forensic Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Theory Of Verbal Completeness, Dale A. Nance
A Theory Of Verbal Completeness, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
In this Article I will endorse the view that the most important modem function of the completeness rule is to trump otherwise applicable exclusionary rules, though not every rule in every instance. I will also offer the general proposition that it should almost always trump one large and important class of exclusionary rules, those based upon the "best evidence" principle, that is, the principle that parties should present to the tribunal the epistemically best evidence available to them on a given litigated issue.
Conditional Probative Value And The Reconstruction Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Conditional Probative Value And The Reconstruction Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
In a recent article, Richard Friedman articulates a modified and generalized version of the doctrine of conditional relevance, which he calls "conditional probative value."1 This version comes in response to a substantial body of academic criticism of the traditional doctrine.2 As one of the critics to whom Professor Friedman responds, I offer this reply with two purposes in mind: (1) to clarify the relationship between Friedman's analysis and my earlier reinterpretation of the conditional relevance doctrine; and (2) to ad- dress Friedman's specific proposals with regard to the Federal Rules of Evidence. I conclude that Friedman's articulation helps clarify the …
Junk Science, Daubert, And Ohio Rule 702, Paul C. Giannelli
Junk Science, Daubert, And Ohio Rule 702, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Do We Really Want To Know The Defendant?, Dale A. Nance
Foreword: Do We Really Want To Know The Defendant?, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
Forward to the Symposium on the Admission of Prior Offense Evidence in Sexual Assualt Cases, Chicago, Illinois, 1994.
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Rape Trauma Syndrome & Child Sexual Abuse Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli
Rape Trauma Syndrome & Child Sexual Abuse Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Chain Of Custody, Paul C. Giannelli
“Junk Science”: The Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
“Junk Science”: The Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Understanding Responses To Hearsay: An Extension Of The Comparative Analysis, Dale A. Nance
Understanding Responses To Hearsay: An Extension Of The Comparative Analysis, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
Response to Professor Damaska's presentation at the Hearsay Reform Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1992.
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Dental And Bite Mark Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Dental And Bite Mark Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Rules Of Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Rules Of Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Best Evidence Rule, Paul C. Giannelli
Hear No Evil, See No Evil: On Professor Nesson's Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance
Hear No Evil, See No Evil: On Professor Nesson's Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
Response to Professor Nesson's presentaiton at the Decision and Interference Litigation symposium, New York, New York, 1991.
Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
Given the nature of my enterprise, I resist stating a specific thesis. Nevertheless, for the reader who wants an organizing or motivating principle, I offer the following two recurrent themes. First, I want to examine the relationship of traditional admissibility rules to the problem of missing evidence and to other forms of juridical response to that problem. The reason for this interest will be explained in the next section. Second, I want to investigate, as we proceed, the extent to which the regulation of proof, evidence law broadly conceived, is instrumentally related to accuracy or truth seeking, and the extent …
Authentication, Paul C. Giannelli
Dna Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli