Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

Artists, Art Collectors And Income Tax, Alan L. Feld

Faculty Scholarship

The federal income tax law treats artists and art collectors differently. Similar transactions concerning artworks produce disparate income tax results, depending on whether they involve the artist or the collector. On balance, these results seem to favor the collector over the artist. But notwithstanding the dismay of some artists and their advocates, the differences in result flow, in the main, from the differences in the source of the taxpayer's investment in the work.

The collector buys the work with after-tax income. Any gain is properly treated as an investment return and is eligible for capital gain benefits.' The collector, however, …

Reading Copyright Cases: The Ad Hoc Approach, Charles Schug

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Towards A Right Of Biography: Controlling Commercial Exploitation Of Personal History, Erik D. Lazar

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Peeking Behind Judicial Robes: A First Amendment Analysis Of Confidential Investigations Of The Judiciary, Cydney Ann Hurowitz

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Functional Works Of Art: Copyright, Design Patent, Or Both, Joan Paul

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Public Broadcasting And The Compulsory License, John Timmel

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Report Of The Copyright Royalty Tribunal On Use Of Certain Copyrighted Works In Connection With Noncommercial Broadcasting As Required By 37 Cfr 304.14, Copyright Royalty Tribunal

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Theatrical Motion Pictures And The Law: A Comprehensive Bibliography Of Law-Related Materials, Frank Houdek, James L. Gunderson

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Universal V. Sony: Is Home Use In Fact Fair Use, Judith Barkan

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Gannett Co. V. Depasquale: A Judicial Arberration, Susan Freya Swift

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Malpractice On The Sidelines: Developing A Standard Of Care For Team Sports Physicians, Morley Ben Pitt

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

California's Resale Royalties Act, Phil Mcleod

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

The Legality Of Ticket Tie-Ins In Intercollegiate Athletics, Arthur D. Austin

University of Richmond Law Review

The dynamics of operating a "major" intercollegiate sports program have a tenuous nexus with academic ideals. Intercollegiate athletics is now a big business, dominated by the balance sheet of gate receipts, T.V. revenues, and talent recruiting. The best high school athletes are aggressively recruited for their physical prowess to play for teams that perform before large crowds-and frequently a national television audience-in gigantic stadiums and field houses. In many instances coaches and players gain national recognition and reverence unequaled by professors, poets, or Nobel prize winners. Yet the sponsors of these sports extravaganzas are academic institutions who by charter and …

A Practical Guide To The Protection Of Artists Through Copyright, Trade Secret, Patent, And Trademark Law, Richard L. Stroup

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Media Cross-Ownership: National Citizens Committee For Broadcasting V. Fcc, H. Thomas Hicks

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Unequal Opportunities: Unneeded, Undesirable, And Unfair, Heidi P. Sanchez, Andrew Jay Schwartzman

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

The Public Interest In Political Broadcasting: Evaded, Eroded, And Eviscerated, Frank J. Kahn, Erwin G. Krasnow

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Civil Rights In The Locker Room: Ludtke V. Kuhn, Mary Lynn Brennan

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Morseburg V. Baylon - The High Court Grants Royalty A Reprieve: Constitutional Challenges To The California Resale Royalties Act, Bob Jones

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Big O V. Goodyear: The Case For Trademark Disparagement, Sheila Dolan

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

The New Copyright Law, Public Broadcasting, And The Public Interest: A Response To Public Broadcasting And The Compulsory License, Eric Smith, James F. Lightstone

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Access To Preliminary Hearings: Is California's Closure Law Unconstitutional, Janice Furhman

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Cable Television And Copyright: Legislation And The Marketplace Model, Stuart N. Brotman

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Petrie V. Illinois High School Association: Gender Classification And High School Athletics, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev. 227 (1980), Diane I. Jennings

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tort Law - Reckless Misconduct In Sports, David S. Horvitz

Duquesne Law Review

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has allowed a professional athlete to recover for an injury caused during a game by the reckless misconduct of an opponent in violation of game rules and customs.

Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., 601 F.2d 516 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 931 (1979).