Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
- Publication
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Institutionalized Word Taboo: The Continuing Saga Of Fcc Indecency Regulation, Christopher M. Fairman
Institutionalized Word Taboo: The Continuing Saga Of Fcc Indecency Regulation, Christopher M. Fairman
Christopher M Fairman
Indecency regulation by the Federal Communication Commission and Supreme Court is the product of word taboo—the subconscious, emotional, involuntary avoidance of certain words out of fear that some harm will occur if they are spoken. Acting in tandem, the Court and the Commissioners create institutionalized word taboo based upon the assumption that broadcast media’s pervasive and intrusive presence into the home endangers unsupervised children. Technological innovation renders this premise invalid today, but institutionalized word taboo remains. This article (1) traces the rise of indecency regulation, (2) explains the invalidity of the assumptions used to justify it, (3) introduces word taboo …