Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Arts and Entertainment (6)
- First amendment; art; government speech doctrine; moral rights (4)
- First Amendment (3)
- Sports (2)
- Broadcast media (1)
-
- Communications Law (1)
- FCC (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fox Television (1)
- Free exercise (1)
- Golden Globe (1)
- Indecency (1)
- Institutionalized word taboo (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Organizations (1)
- Pacifica (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Profanity (1)
- RICO (1)
- Religion (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Retirement Security (1)
- Science and Technology (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Sincerity (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
A Constitutinal Analysis Of The Ncaa’S New Autonomous Governance Model And Its Effects On Student Athletes, Non-Athletes, And Professors – Is The Termination Of Uab’S Football Program Just The Beginning Of Things To Come?, Tyler N. Wilson
Tyler N Wilson
No abstract provided.
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Mark Strasser
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion. Non-religious practices do not receive those same protections, which makes the ability to distinguish between religious and non-religious practices important. Regrettably, members of the Court have been unable to agree about how to distinguish the religious from the non-religious—sometimes, the implicit criteria focus on the sincerity of the beliefs, sometimes the strength of the beliefs or the role that they play in an individual’s life, and sometimes the kind of beliefs. In short, the Court has virtually guaranteed an incoherent jurisprudence by sending contradictory signals with …
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
Unringing The Bell: The Government Speech Doctrine And Publicly-Funded Art, John Barlow
John Barlow
No abstract provided.
Institutionalized Word Taboo: The Continuing Saga Of Fcc Indecency Regulation, Christopher M. Fairman
Institutionalized Word Taboo: The Continuing Saga Of Fcc Indecency Regulation, Christopher M. Fairman
Christopher M Fairman
Indecency regulation by the Federal Communication Commission and Supreme Court is the product of word taboo—the subconscious, emotional, involuntary avoidance of certain words out of fear that some harm will occur if they are spoken. Acting in tandem, the Court and the Commissioners create institutionalized word taboo based upon the assumption that broadcast media’s pervasive and intrusive presence into the home endangers unsupervised children. Technological innovation renders this premise invalid today, but institutionalized word taboo remains. This article (1) traces the rise of indecency regulation, (2) explains the invalidity of the assumptions used to justify it, (3) introduces word taboo …