Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (45)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (35)
- Law and Race (35)
- Law and Politics (14)
- First Amendment (10)
-
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Supreme Court of the United States (5)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Communications Law (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Tax Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- European Law (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Marketing Law (1)
- Nonprofit Organizations Law (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Transnational Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (35)
- The University of Akron (9)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (35)
- Shelby County v. Holder (34)
- Right to vote (33)
- Berkeley (31)
- Touro (31)
-
- Race (29)
- Racism (28)
- VRA (27)
- Shelby (26)
- Voter ID laws (25)
- Discrimination (23)
- Section 5 (21)
- Chief Justice Roberts (20)
- Civil rights (20)
- Disenfranchisement (19)
- Preclearance (18)
- Democracy (17)
- Racial discrimination (15)
- Voting Rights Act (15)
- Coverage formula (13)
- Section 4 (12)
- Fifteenth Amendment (11)
- Voting rights act (11)
- Minority voting rights (10)
- Section 4(b) (9)
- Justice Roberts (8)
- Shelby County (8)
- Voting rights (8)
- Campaign finance (7)
- Elections (7)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (32)
- Akron Law Review (9)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (3)
-
- Touro Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Montana Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 81
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
On The Repeal Of The Voting Rights Act And The Breadth Of The Long Counter Revolution, Ifetayo M. Flannery
On The Repeal Of The Voting Rights Act And The Breadth Of The Long Counter Revolution, Ifetayo M. Flannery
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Backsliding: The United States Supreme Court, Shelby County V. Holder And The Dismantling Of Voting Rights Act Of 1965, Bridgette Baldwin
Backsliding: The United States Supreme Court, Shelby County V. Holder And The Dismantling Of Voting Rights Act Of 1965, Bridgette Baldwin
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
The Post-Shelby County Game, Steven R. Morrison
The Post-Shelby County Game, Steven R. Morrison
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
After Nfib V. Sebelius, When Does The Cost Of Voting Become An Illegal Poll Tax?, Andre L. Smith
After Nfib V. Sebelius, When Does The Cost Of Voting Become An Illegal Poll Tax?, Andre L. Smith
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Toward A Fundamental Right To Evade Law? The Rule Of Power In Shelby County And State Farm, Martha T. Mccluskey
Toward A Fundamental Right To Evade Law? The Rule Of Power In Shelby County And State Farm, Martha T. Mccluskey
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Unmistakably Clear: Human Rights, The Right To Representation, And Remedial Voting Rights Of People Of Color, Matthew H. Charity
Unmistakably Clear: Human Rights, The Right To Representation, And Remedial Voting Rights Of People Of Color, Matthew H. Charity
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
The Blinding Color Of Race: Elections And Democracy In The Post-Shelby County Era, Sahar F. Aziz
The Blinding Color Of Race: Elections And Democracy In The Post-Shelby County Era, Sahar F. Aziz
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
One Step Forward, Two Steps Backward: How The Supreme Court’S Decision In Shelby County V. Holder Eviscerated The Voting Rights Act And What Civil Rights Advocates Should Do About It, Pamela Edwards
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Unseen Exclusions In Voting And Immigration Law, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández
Unseen Exclusions In Voting And Immigration Law, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Shelby, Race, And Disability Rights, Ravi Malhotra
Shelby, Race, And Disability Rights, Ravi Malhotra
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Preferential Judicial Activism, Sudha Setty
Preferential Judicial Activism, Sudha Setty
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Frederick Douglass On Shelby County, Olympia Duhart
Frederick Douglass On Shelby County, Olympia Duhart
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Post Oppression, Christian B. Sundquist
Post Oppression, Christian B. Sundquist
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Legal Post-Racialism As An Instrument Of Racial Compromise In Shelby County V. Holder, Pantea Javidan
Legal Post-Racialism As An Instrument Of Racial Compromise In Shelby County V. Holder, Pantea Javidan
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Shelby County V. Holder: A Critical Analysis Of The Post-Racial Movement’S Relationship To Bystander Denial And Its Effect On Perceptions Of Ongoing Discrimination In Voting, Abra S. Mason
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Electoral Silver Linings After Shelby, Citizens United And Bennett, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy
Electoral Silver Linings After Shelby, Citizens United And Bennett, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Setting Congress Up To Fail, Margaret B. Kwoka
Setting Congress Up To Fail, Margaret B. Kwoka
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
The Voting Game, Sarah R. Robinson
The Voting Game, Sarah R. Robinson
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
The Second Reconstruction Is Over, Robert V. Ward Jr.
The Second Reconstruction Is Over, Robert V. Ward Jr.
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Still Fighting After All These Years: Minority Voting Rights 50 Years After The March On Washington, Deborah N. Archer
Still Fighting After All These Years: Minority Voting Rights 50 Years After The March On Washington, Deborah N. Archer
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Any Is Too Much: Shelby County V. Holder And Diminished Citizenship, Peter Halewood
Any Is Too Much: Shelby County V. Holder And Diminished Citizenship, Peter Halewood
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Demography And Democracy, Phyllis Goldfarb
Demography And Democracy, Phyllis Goldfarb
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
The Past As Prologue: Shelby County V. Holder And The Risks Ahead, J. Corey Harris
The Past As Prologue: Shelby County V. Holder And The Risks Ahead, J. Corey Harris
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Elimination Dance, Sarah Jane Forman
Elimination Dance, Sarah Jane Forman
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Eviscerating The Voting Rights Act And Moral Authority: Freedom To Discriminate Comes With A Price, Patricia A. Broussard
Eviscerating The Voting Rights Act And Moral Authority: Freedom To Discriminate Comes With A Price, Patricia A. Broussard
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Jackals, Tall Ships, And The Endless Forest Of Lies: Foreword To Symposium On The Voting Rights Act In The Wake Of Shelby County V. Holder, Anthony Paul Farley
Jackals, Tall Ships, And The Endless Forest Of Lies: Foreword To Symposium On The Voting Rights Act In The Wake Of Shelby County V. Holder, Anthony Paul Farley
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
A Quantum Congress, Jorge R. Roig
A Quantum Congress, Jorge R. Roig
Chicago-Kent Law Review
This article tries to address the problem of a corrupt and broken electoral system that has been captured by special interests through big money spending in political campaigns, while at the same time preserving the spirit of the Free Speech Clause of our Constitution. In doing so, this article first reviews and summarizes the different alternatives proposed as potential fixes for the campaign finance problem. It then explains why none of the proposed alternatives can accomplish the dual goals set out above. Finally, the article briefly sketches a proposal for a fundamental reworking of our representative democracy by substituting legislative …
Tiered Personhood And The Excluded Voter, Atiba R. Ellis
Tiered Personhood And The Excluded Voter, Atiba R. Ellis
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The modern discourse critiquing vote denial policies in the United States has taken two distinct paths. The first and more recent path has been to critique the effects of legislation like voter identification laws, narrowed early voting opportunities, and similar enactments to hyper-regulate the voting process, effecting, as some argue, the ability for the poor, the elderly, and minorities to vote. The second strain of this voter suppression discourse relates to the express exclusion of persons who have been convicted of felonies from the exercise of the franchise. While both vote denial by effect or by express disenfranchisement have raised …
In All Fairness: Using Political Broadcast Access Doctrine To Tailor Public Campaign Fund Matching, Andrew V. Moshirnia, Aaron T. Dozeman
In All Fairness: Using Political Broadcast Access Doctrine To Tailor Public Campaign Fund Matching, Andrew V. Moshirnia, Aaron T. Dozeman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions have undermined the viability of campaign public financing systems, a vital tool for fighting political corruption. First, Citizens United v. FEC allowed privately financed candidates and independent groups to spend unlimited amounts of money on campaigning. Publicly financed candidates now risk being vastly outspent. Second, Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. Bennett invalidated a proportional fund matching system whereby privately financed candidates’ or independent groups’ spending triggered funds to publicly funded candidates. These decisions effectuate a libertarian speech doctrine: all speakers, individual or corporate, must be absolutely unburdened. To comply with this approach, …
Voter Primacy, Sarah C. Haan
Voter Primacy, Sarah C. Haan
Fordham Law Review
This Article argues that Citizens United v. FEC expanded the audience for campaign finance disclosure to include a group that had never before been held relevant to campaign finance disclosure—corporate shareholders—and explores the constitutional, policy, and political consequences of this change. In part IV of Citizens United, the U.S. Supreme Court departed from more than thirty years of campaign finance disclosure analysis to treat corporate shareholders as a target audience for corporate electoral spending disclosure, holding that the governmental interest advanced by campaign finance disclosure laws includes an interest in helping corporate shareholders “determine whether their corporation’s political speech advances …