Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (56)
- Constitutional Law (19)
- Evidence (16)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (11)
- Supreme Court of the United States (11)
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Fourth Amendment (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Legal History (8)
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (7)
- Courts (7)
- Sociology (7)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (6)
- Legal Studies (6)
- Criminology (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Juvenile Law (4)
- Law and Race (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Arts and Humanities (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Philosophy (3)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- Columbia Law School (8)
- Mercer University School of Law (8)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (8)
- Selected Works (7)
-
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- University of Missouri School of Law (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Death penalty (12)
- Capital punishment (11)
- Admissibility (6)
- Evidence (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
-
- Confessions (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Criminal procedure (4)
- Death sentence (4)
- Hearsay (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Miranda v. Arizona (4)
- Custodial interrogations (3)
- Eighth Amendment (3)
- Legal Philosophy (3)
- Police (3)
- Sentencing guidelines (3)
- Totality of circumstances (3)
- Witnesses (3)
- CJP (2)
- Capital Jury Project (2)
- Capital jurors (2)
- Capital offense (2)
- Congress (2)
- Crime (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Criminal defense (2)
- Criminal justice system (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Articles (10)
- Mercer Law Review (8)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
-
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Oklahoma Law Review (5)
- Capital Defense Journal (4)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- Frank R. Herrmann, S.J. (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Maryland Law Review (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Washington International Law Journal (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 90 of 120
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Completing The Sentencing Revolution: Reconsidering Sentencing Procedure In The Guidelines Era, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Completing The Sentencing Revolution: Reconsidering Sentencing Procedure In The Guidelines Era, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
The central innovation of the guidelines sentencing revolution has been the creation of a regime in which facts other than those required for conviction have necessary consequences at sentencing. In days of yore, judges mulling a sentence were entitled to receive information from virtually any source on virtually any subject, but they were never obliged to pass public judgment on the truth or falsity of what they heard because no finding of fact could constrain their discretion to set a sentence anywhere within the boundaries set by statutory maxima and minima. No more. The project of the original United States …
When Does A Retroactive Decrease In The Frequency Of Parole Reconsideration Hearings Violate The Ex Post Facto Clause?, Rachel A. Van Cleave
When Does A Retroactive Decrease In The Frequency Of Parole Reconsideration Hearings Violate The Ex Post Facto Clause?, Rachel A. Van Cleave
Publications
No abstract provided.
Does The Ex Post Facto Clause Bar Texas From Retroactively Limiting The Need For Proof That A Sex-Offense Victim Made An "Outcry"?, Rachel A. Van Cleave
Does The Ex Post Facto Clause Bar Texas From Retroactively Limiting The Need For Proof That A Sex-Offense Victim Made An "Outcry"?, Rachel A. Van Cleave
Publications
No abstract provided.
Science Fact Or Science Fiction? The Implications Of Court-Ordered Genetic Testing Under Rule 35, 34 U.S.F. L. Rev. 295 (2000), Anthony Niedwiecki
Science Fact Or Science Fiction? The Implications Of Court-Ordered Genetic Testing Under Rule 35, 34 U.S.F. L. Rev. 295 (2000), Anthony Niedwiecki
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Finality Of Judgment And Sentence Prerequisite In The United States-Peru Bilateral Prisoner Transfer Treaty: Calling Congress And The President To Reform And Justifying Jurisdiction Of The Inter-American Human Rights Commission And Court, 15 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 1071 (2000), Ralph Ruebner, Lisa Carroll
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Balancing Hearsay And Criminal Discovery, John G. Douglass
Balancing Hearsay And Criminal Discovery, John G. Douglass
Law Faculty Publications
and prosecutors. Part I of this Article argues that the conventional theory of hearsaydiscovery balance does not reflect the reality of modem federal practice. An imbalance has arisen because, in the last quarter century, developments in the law of evidence and confrontation are at odds with developments-or one might say nondevelopments-in the law of criminal discovery. Since enactment of the Federal Rules of Evidence in 1975, both the law of evidence and modem Confrontation Clause doctrine have evolved toward broader admission of hearsay in criminal cases. Contrary to conventional theory, that evolution has at least matched-and probably has outpaced-the trend …
Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering The Guidelines’ Approach To Real Offense Sentencing, David N. Yellen
Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering The Guidelines’ Approach To Real Offense Sentencing, David N. Yellen
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
The Adversity Of Race And Place: Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence In Illinois V. Wardlow, 528 S. Ct. 673 (2000), Adam B. Wolf
The Adversity Of Race And Place: Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence In Illinois V. Wardlow, 528 S. Ct. 673 (2000), Adam B. Wolf
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This Case Note lays out Wardlow's pertinent facts, describes the decisions of the Court and lower courts, and then analyzes the ramifications of the Court's holding. In particular, this Case Note argues that the Court's ruling recognizes substantially less Fourth Amendment protections for people of color and indigent citizens than for wealthy Caucasians. This perpetuates a cycle of humiliating experiences, as well as fear and mistrust of the police by many poor people of color.
Time For Final Action On 18 U.S.C. § 3292, Abraham Abramovsky, Jonathan I. Edelstein
Time For Final Action On 18 U.S.C. § 3292, Abraham Abramovsky, Jonathan I. Edelstein
Michigan Journal of International Law
18 U.S.C. § 3292 was enacted in order to meet a compelling prosecutorial need-the increasing necessity of obtaining evidence from abroad via procedures which are frequently time-consuming. However, the statute contains numerous ambiguities, as well as built-in disadvantages both to prosecutors and defendants, which diminish its value as a prosecutorial evidence-gathering device while increasing the possibility that defendants' rights and expectations will be violated. However, it is possible to interpret the statute in a manner which is consistent with its terms and purpose and which concomitantly preserves the rights of the Government and of grand jury targets.
Is America A Systematic Violator Of Human Rights In The Administration Of Criminal Justice?, Stephen C. Thaman
Is America A Systematic Violator Of Human Rights In The Administration Of Criminal Justice?, Stephen C. Thaman
All Faculty Scholarship
This article focuses on vast American violations of human rights in the administration of criminal justice. It traces the development of these rights in the context of the two most pernicious human rights violations plaguing the United States: the death penalty and racism in the enforcement of criminal laws. The author calls attention to the politicization of the American justice system and its devastatingly negative impact on America’s preservation of human rights.
Structuring Criminal Codes To Perform Their Function, Paul H. Robinson
Structuring Criminal Codes To Perform Their Function, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
This paper argues that criminal codes have two distinct functions. First, a code must ex ante announce the rules of conduct. Second, it must set out the principles of for adjudicating, ex post, violations of those rules. These two functions often are in tension with one another. Each calls for a different kind of code, addressed to a different audience, with different objectives: To be effective ex ante, the rules of conduct must be formulated in a way that they will be understood, remembered, and able to be applied in daily life by lay persons with a wide range of …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preventing Summary Judgment Against Inmates Who Have Been Sexually Assaulted By Showing That The Risk Was Obvious, Brian Saccenti
Preventing Summary Judgment Against Inmates Who Have Been Sexually Assaulted By Showing That The Risk Was Obvious, Brian Saccenti
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Victim's Rights Amendment: A Prosecutor's, And Surprisingly, A Defense Attorney's Support In Sentencing, Steven I. Platt, Jeannie Pittillo Kauffman
The Victim's Rights Amendment: A Prosecutor's, And Surprisingly, A Defense Attorney's Support In Sentencing, Steven I. Platt, Jeannie Pittillo Kauffman
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Vehicle Searches – The Automobile Exception: The Constitutional Ride From Carroll V. United States To Wyoming V. Houghton, Martin L. O'Connor
Vehicle Searches – The Automobile Exception: The Constitutional Ride From Carroll V. United States To Wyoming V. Houghton, Martin L. O'Connor
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Acting Without "Just Cause": An Analysis Of The Ninth Circuit's Decision In United States V. Symington, James R. Coltharp Jr.
Acting Without "Just Cause": An Analysis Of The Ninth Circuit's Decision In United States V. Symington, James R. Coltharp Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Suggestibility Of Children: Scientific Research And Legal Implications, Stephen J. Ceci, Richard D. Friedman
The Suggestibility Of Children: Scientific Research And Legal Implications, Stephen J. Ceci, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this Article, Professors Ceci and Friedman analyze psychological studies on children's suggestibility and find a broad consensus that young children are suggestible to a significant degree. Studies confirm that interviewers commonly use suggestive interviewing techniques that exacerbate this suggestibility, creating a significant risk in some forensic contexts-notably but not exclusively those of suspected child abuse-that children will make false assertions of fact. Professors Ceci and Friedman address the implications of this difficulty for the legal system and respond to Professor Lyon's criticism of this view recently articulated in the Cornell Law Review. Using Bayesian probability theory, Professors Ceci and …
Capital Attrition: Error Rates In Capital Cases, 1973-1995, James S. Liebman, Jeffery Fagan, Valerie West, Jonathan Lloyd
Capital Attrition: Error Rates In Capital Cases, 1973-1995, James S. Liebman, Jeffery Fagan, Valerie West, Jonathan Lloyd
Faculty Scholarship
Americans seem to be of two minds about the death penalty. In the last several years, the overall number of executions has risen steeply, reaching a fifty year high this year. Although two-thirds of the public support the penalty, this figure represents a sharp decline from the four-fifths of the population that endorsed the death penalty only six years ago, leaving support for capital punishment at a twenty year low. When life without parole is offered as an alternative, support for the penalty drops even more – often below a majority. Grants of executive clemency reached a twenty year high …
Drug Treatment Courts And Emergent Experimentalist Government, Michael C. Dorf, Charles F. Sabel
Drug Treatment Courts And Emergent Experimentalist Government, Michael C. Dorf, Charles F. Sabel
Faculty Scholarship
Despite the continuing "war on drugs," the last decade has witnessed the creation and nationwide spread of a remarkable set of institutions, drug treatment courts. In drug treatment court, a criminal defendant pleads guilty or otherwise accepts responsibility for a charged offense and accepts placement in a court-mandated program of drug treatment. The judge and court personnel closely monitor the defendant's performance in the program and the program's capacity to serve the mandated client. The federal government and national associations in turn monitor the local drug treatment courts and disseminate successful practices. The ensemble of institutions, monitoring, and pooling exemplifies …
Adieu To Electrocution, Deborah W. Denno
Adieu To Electrocution, Deborah W. Denno
Faculty Scholarship
This Article contends that there is no moral or legal reason to retain electrocution, particularly because other execution methods are available. It is clear that at some point soon, electrocution will no longer exist in this country and, as a result, throughout the world. By eliminating this perplexing vestige, the other problems with the death penalty may appear all that more offensive.
"Can (Did) Congress 'Overrule' Miranda?, Yale Kamisar
"Can (Did) Congress 'Overrule' Miranda?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
I think the great majority of judges, lawyers, and law professors would have concurred in Judge Friendly's remarks when he made them thirty-three years ago. To put it another way, I believe few would have had much confidence in the constitutionality of an anti-Miranda provision, usually known as § 3501 because of its designation under Title 18 of the United States Code, a provision of Title II of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Crime Act or the Crime Bill), when that legislation was signed by the president on June 19, …
The Culpability, Or Mens Rea, "Defense" In Arkansas, J. Thomas Sullivan
The Culpability, Or Mens Rea, "Defense" In Arkansas, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Michael Edmund O'Neill
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Michael Edmund O'Neill
University of Richmond Law Review
The Commonwealth of Virginia is so named (as opposed to being denominated simply a "state") because the term "commonwealth" is used to indicate a government in which "supreme power is vested in the people."' That term is particularly apt, for in what better way does a government provide for the common weal of its people than by protecting them against crime, while at the same time respecting their individual rights and liberties? This is a delicate balance, one that is reflected in this survey of the most recent developments in Virginia criminal law and procedure. The legislative enactments and judicial …
Joe Grano: The 'Kid From South Philly' Who Educated Us All (In Tribute To Joseph D. Grano), Yale Kamisar
Joe Grano: The 'Kid From South Philly' Who Educated Us All (In Tribute To Joseph D. Grano), Yale Kamisar
Articles
No serious student of police interrogation and confessions can write on the subject without building on Professor Joseph D. Grano's work or explaining why he or she disagrees with him (and doing so with considerable care). Nor is that all.
Thinking The Unthinkable Recasting The Presumption Of Edwards V. Arizona, Eugene L. Shapiro
Thinking The Unthinkable Recasting The Presumption Of Edwards V. Arizona, Eugene L. Shapiro
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure: Allowing The Prosecution A "Second Bite At The Apple" In Non-Capital Sentencing: Monge V. California, Eva Maria Floyd
Criminal Procedure: Allowing The Prosecution A "Second Bite At The Apple" In Non-Capital Sentencing: Monge V. California, Eva Maria Floyd
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Procedure In Capital Cases: Why Federal Habeas Courts Should Review The Merits Of Every Death Sentence, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Substance And Procedure In Capital Cases: Why Federal Habeas Courts Should Review The Merits Of Every Death Sentence, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Dignity And Victimhood, Kent Greenawalt
Dignity And Victimhood, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
If Sandy Kadish has reminded us of limitations of consequentialist approaches to the criminal law and has proposed persuasive resolutions of issues that deontological perspectives reveal, Meir Dan-Cohen has jarred us to rethink fundamental premises about rules in the criminal justice system. His Essay is an example of his ingenuity for unsettling understandings. The Essay reads easily and seems deceptively straightforward, but it is rich in nuance and its themes are complex. This Response identifies the various themes and evaluates their plausibility. I take Professor Dan-Cohen's Essay as a preliminary exploration of a major subject, and I have responded accordingly, …
Lilly V. Virginia Glimmers Of Hope For The Confrontation Clause?, Richard D. Friedman
Lilly V. Virginia Glimmers Of Hope For The Confrontation Clause?, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In 1662, in The Case of Thomas Tong and Others, which involved charges of treason against several defendants, the judges of the King's Bench conferred on a crucial set of points of procedure. As reported by one of the judges, Sir John Kelyng, the judges agreed unanimously that a pretrial confession made to the authorities was evidence against the Party himself who made the Confession, and indeed, if adequately proved could support a conviction of that party without additional witnesses to the treason itself. But -- again unanimously, and quite definitively -- the judges also agreed that the confession cannot …