Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal (12)
- Legal (8)
- Public (7)
- "Rhode Island" (6)
- Court (6)
-
- Defense (6)
- Judge (6)
- Justice (6)
- Alumni (5)
- Attorney (5)
- Community (5)
- Counsel (5)
- Judicial (5)
- RWU (5)
- Advocate (4)
- Black (4)
- Case (4)
- Crime (4)
- Criminal Justice (4)
- District (4)
- Families (4)
- Horwitz (4)
- Low-income (4)
- Organizations (4)
- Prosecution (4)
- Rights (4)
- Students (4)
- Support (4)
- Yelnosky (4)
- Advisory (3)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (12)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (7)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Law Library Newsletters/Blog (2)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (2)
-
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Deason Criminal Justice Reform Center (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (1)
- Pro Bono Collaborative Staff Publications (1)
- Theses and Dissertations--Political Science (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Book Review Essay: Jewish And American Law: A Comparative Study. (Vols. 1 And 2) By Samuel J. Levine, Marie A. Failinger
Book Review Essay: Jewish And American Law: A Comparative Study. (Vols. 1 And 2) By Samuel J. Levine, Marie A. Failinger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can The International Criminal Court Succeed? An Analysis Of The Empirical Evidence Of Violence Prevention, Stuart Ford
Can The International Criminal Court Succeed? An Analysis Of The Empirical Evidence Of Violence Prevention, Stuart Ford
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
Despite significant optimism about the future of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) during its early years, recently there has been growing criticism of it by both scholars and governments. As a result, there appears to be more doubt about the ICC’s ability to succeed now than at any other point in its history. So, are the critics correct? Is the ICC failing? No. This Article argues that, not only can the ICC succeed, there is strong evidence that it is already succeeding. It analyzes several recent empirical articles that have convincingly demonstrated that the ICC prevents serious violations of international …
Say “No” To Discrimination, “Yes” To Accommodation: Why States Should Prohibit Discrimination Of Workers Who Use Cannabis For Medical Purposes, Anne Marie Lofaso, Lakyn D. Cecil
Say “No” To Discrimination, “Yes” To Accommodation: Why States Should Prohibit Discrimination Of Workers Who Use Cannabis For Medical Purposes, Anne Marie Lofaso, Lakyn D. Cecil
Seattle University Law Review
This Article addresses the question of how the law should treat medical cannabis in the employment context. Using Colorado as a primary example, we argue that states such as Colorado should amend their constitutions and legislate to provide employment protections for employees who are registered medical cannabis cardholders or registered caregivers.
Part I briefly traces the legal regulation of cannabis from an unregulated medicine known as cannabis to a highly regulated illicit substance known as marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act. Our travail through this history reveals, unsurprisingly, an increasing demonization of cannabis throughout the twentieth century. That socio-legal demonization …
Washington’S Young Offenders: O’Dell Demands A Change To Sentencing Guidelines, Erika Vranizan
Washington’S Young Offenders: O’Dell Demands A Change To Sentencing Guidelines, Erika Vranizan
Seattle University Law Review
This Note argues that the O’Dell decision was a watershed moment for criminal justice reform. It argues that the reasoning in O’Dell should be seized upon by the legislature to take action to remediate instances in which defendants are legal adults but do not possess the cognitive characteristics of an adult sufficient to justify adult punishment. Given both the scientific impossibility of identifying a precise age at which characteristics of youthfulness end and adulthood begins and the Court’s repeated recognition that these very factors impact culpability, the current approach to sentencing young offenders aged eighteen to twenty-five as adults simply …