Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (14)
- Courts (13)
- Criminal Law (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (10)
-
- State and Local Government Law (9)
- Law and Society (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Judges (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Law and Race (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Evidence (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Social Welfare Law (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Legal Profession (3)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (3)
- Rule of Law (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (18)
- Selected Works (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
-
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (14)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
-
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (2)
- Alan J. Meese (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Law School Blogs (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Richard Daniel Klein (1)
- Thomas A. Schweitzer (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 40
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Discretionary Injustice: Limiting Due Process Rights Of Undocumented Immigrants Upon Removal After Re-Entry, Brendan Dauscher
Discretionary Injustice: Limiting Due Process Rights Of Undocumented Immigrants Upon Removal After Re-Entry, Brendan Dauscher
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ethical Considerations For Attorneys Researching Jurors On The Internet, Anthony M. Lapinta
Ethical Considerations For Attorneys Researching Jurors On The Internet, Anthony M. Lapinta
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Prejudice-Based Rights In Criminal Procedure, Justin Murray
Prejudice-Based Rights In Criminal Procedure, Justin Murray
Articles & Chapters
This Article critically examines a cluster of rules that use the concept of prejudice to restrict the scope of criminal defendants’ procedural rights, forming what I call prejudice-based rights. I focus, in particular, on outcome-centric prejudice- based rights—rights that apply only when failing to apply them might cause prejudice by affecting the outcome of the case. Two of criminal defendants’ most important rights fit this description: the right, originating in Brady v. Maryland, to obtain favorable, “material” evidence within the government’s knowledge, and the right to effective assistance of counsel. Since prejudice (or equivalently, materiality) is an element of these …
The “Step-Child Of Scholarly Investigation”: Preliminary Observations About The Origins Of Academic Jewish Law Scholarship, David Hollander
The “Step-Child Of Scholarly Investigation”: Preliminary Observations About The Origins Of Academic Jewish Law Scholarship, David Hollander
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review And Nongeneralizable Cases, Neal Devins, Alan J. Meese
Judicial Review And Nongeneralizable Cases, Neal Devins, Alan J. Meese
Alan J. Meese
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Identifying And Preventing Improper Prosecutorial Comment In Closing Argument, Robert W. Clifford
Identifying And Preventing Improper Prosecutorial Comment In Closing Argument, Robert W. Clifford
Maine Law Review
In recent years, several decisions of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court sitting as the Law Court have addressed the comments of prosecutors in final argument before criminal juries. Three of those decisions in particular have caused concern among prosecutors and have stirred discussion in the Maine legal community. In vacating convictions in State v. Steen, State v. Casella, and State v. Tripp, the Law Court focused on the language used by the prosecutors during closing argument and concluded that those prosecutors impermissibly expressed personal opinion concerning the credibility of the defendants, or witnesses called by the defendants. This Article examines …
Post-Racialism And The End Of Strict Scrutiny, David Schraub
Post-Racialism And The End Of Strict Scrutiny, David Schraub
Indiana Law Journal
In recent years, a growing social consensus has emerged around the aspiration of a “post-racial” America: one where race is no longer a fault line for social strife or, perhaps, a morally significant trait whatsoever. This ambition, however, lies in tension with the most basic constitutional principle governing our treatment of race in the public sphere: that of “strict scrutiny.” Post-racialism seeks to diminish the salience of race to near negligibility. The strict scrutiny of racial classifications, by contrast, significantly enhances the salience of race by treating it differently from virtually every other personal attribute or characteristic—including hair or eye …
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jared A. Goldstein's Blog: Trump's Order Violates Bedrock Principles Of Roger Williams And Ri 01-30-2017, Jared A. Goldstein
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jared A. Goldstein's Blog: Trump's Order Violates Bedrock Principles Of Roger Williams And Ri 01-30-2017, Jared A. Goldstein
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Limits Of Client-Centered Decision Making, Todd A. Berger
The Constitutional Limits Of Client-Centered Decision Making, Todd A. Berger
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Past As Prologue: Shelby County V. Holder And The Risks Ahead, J. Corey Harris
The Past As Prologue: Shelby County V. Holder And The Risks Ahead, J. Corey Harris
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Before Powell V. Alabama: Lessons From History For The Future Of The Right To Counsel, Sara Mayeux
All Faculty Scholarship
The doctrinal literature on ineffective assistance of counsel typically begins with the 1932 Supreme Court case of Powell v. Alabama. This symposium contribution goes back farther, locating the IAC doctrine’s origins in a series of state cases from the 1880s through the 1920s. At common law, the traditional agency rule held that counsel incompetence was never grounds for a new trial. Between the 1880s and the 1920s, state appellate judges chipped away at that rule, developing a more flexible doctrine that allowed appellate courts to reverse criminal convictions in cases where, because of egregious attorney ineptitude, there was reason …
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Dillard, Edward Puerta
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Dillard, Edward Puerta
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Ramchair, Joseph Maehr
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Ramchair, Joseph Maehr
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Plea Bargaining And The Right To Counsel At Bail Hearings, Charlie Gerstein
Plea Bargaining And The Right To Counsel At Bail Hearings, Charlie Gerstein
Michigan Law Review
A couple million indigent defendants in this country face bail hearings each year and most of them do so without court-appointed lawyers. In two recent companion cases, Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, the Supreme Court held that the loss of a favorable plea bargain can satisfy the prejudice prong of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. If the Constitution requires effective assistance of counsel to protect plea bargains, it requires the presence of counsel at proceedings that have the capacity to prejudice those bargains. Pretrial detention has the capacity to prejudice a plea bargain because a defendant held …
Why Federal Rule Of Evidence 403 Is Unconstitutional, And Why That Matters, Kenneth S. Klein
Why Federal Rule Of Evidence 403 Is Unconstitutional, And Why That Matters, Kenneth S. Klein
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chandler V. Florida: Cameras, Courts, And The Constitution, Allen F. Camp
Chandler V. Florida: Cameras, Courts, And The Constitution, Allen F. Camp
Pepperdine Law Review
The rising importance of television journalism in the 1960's has resulted in the Supreme Court deciding whether a criminal defendant's due process rights are violated by camera coverage of the courtroom proceeding. The decision of Chandler v. Florida clearly provides the answer; for unless a defendant proves prejudice with specificity, the Constitution does not ban televised criminal trials. The author examines the issues with a revealing historical perspective. He then traces the Court's factual and legal analysis and concludes that the decision will serve to offer the states guidance in deciding whether to implement a program allowing television coverage of …
The Supreme Court’S Analysis Of Issues Raised By Death Penalty Litigants In The Court's 2004 Term, Richard Klein
The Supreme Court’S Analysis Of Issues Raised By Death Penalty Litigants In The Court's 2004 Term, Richard Klein
Richard Daniel Klein
No abstract provided.
Hate Speech On Campus And The First Amendment: Can They Be Reconciled?, Thomas Schweitzer
Hate Speech On Campus And The First Amendment: Can They Be Reconciled?, Thomas Schweitzer
Thomas A. Schweitzer
No abstract provided.
Can We Talk? How Triggers For Unconscious Racism Strengthen The Importance Of Dialogue, Adjoa A. Aiyetoro
Can We Talk? How Triggers For Unconscious Racism Strengthen The Importance Of Dialogue, Adjoa A. Aiyetoro
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court’S Analysis Of Issues Raised By Death Penalty Litigants In The Court's 2004 Term, Richard Klein
The Supreme Court’S Analysis Of Issues Raised By Death Penalty Litigants In The Court's 2004 Term, Richard Klein
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review And Nongeneralizable Cases, Neal Devins, Alan J. Meese
Judicial Review And Nongeneralizable Cases, Neal Devins, Alan J. Meese
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Reflections On Brown And The Future, Oliver W. Hill Sr.
Reflections On Brown And The Future, Oliver W. Hill Sr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Equality Leaves Everyone Worse Off: The Problem Of Leveling Down In Equality Law, Deborah Brake
When Equality Leaves Everyone Worse Off: The Problem Of Leveling Down In Equality Law, Deborah Brake
Articles
This Article addresses the problem of leveling down as a response to discrimination. Existing case law and legal scholarship generally assume that inequality may be remedied in one of two ways: improving the lot of the disfavored group to match that of the most favored group, or worsening the treatment of the favored group until they fare as badly as everyone else. The term "leveling down" refers to the latter response. This Article contends that courts and commentators have overstated the flexibility of equality rights in accepting leveling down as a response to inequality, and proposes a new framework that …
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Scholarly Works
In this Article, Professor Lazos examines initiatives and referendums in which a majority is in a position to vote on the content of a minority's democratic civic standing. Case law fails to set forth a single test for judicial review; consequently, doctrinal and theoretical coherence in this area is nonexistent. Professor Lazos proposes a test that takes into account social dynamics and focuses on the impact of these measures. First, she examines outcomes over the last three decades of approximately eighty such initiatives and referendums, from the anti-integration movement of the sixties to today's ideological and cultural versions, such as …
The Irony Of Harmless Error, Charles S. Chapel
The Irony Of Harmless Error, Charles S. Chapel
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Supreme Court New York County: People V. Julio Batiz
Due Process, Supreme Court New York County: People V. Julio Batiz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Burden" Of Proof In Federal Habeas Litigation, J. Thomas Sullivan
The "Burden" Of Proof In Federal Habeas Litigation, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.