Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (52)
- Fordham Law School (12)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (8)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- Selected Works (5)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- New York Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Claremont Colleges (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (46)
- Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Arkansas Law Review (8)
- Fordham Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- CMC Senior Theses (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Adam Lamparello (1)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects (1)
- Darren L Hutchinson (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- James L. Kainen (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Martin A. Schwartz (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 125 of 125
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Nineteenth Century Interpretations Of The Federal Contract Clause: The Transformation From Vested To Substantive Rights Against The State , James L. Kainen
Nineteenth Century Interpretations Of The Federal Contract Clause: The Transformation From Vested To Substantive Rights Against The State , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
During the early nineteenth century, the contract clause served as the fundamental source of federally protected rights against the state. Yet the Supreme Court gradually eased many of the restrictions on state power enforced in the contract clause cases while developing the doctrine of substantive due process after the Civil War. By the end of the nineteenth century, the due process clause had usurped the place of the contract clause as the centerpiece in litigation about individual rights. Most analyses of the history of federally protected rights against the state have emphasized the rise of substantive due process to the …
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 97 S. Ct. 555 (1977), Karen K. Kinkennon
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 97 S. Ct. 555 (1977), Karen K. Kinkennon
Florida State University Law Review
Zoning- DISCRIMINATORY INTENT MUST BE PROVED BEFORE COURTS MAY REACH FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUES.
Bakke Revisited - What The Court's Decision Means - And Doesn't Mean, Douglas D. Scherer
Bakke Revisited - What The Court's Decision Means - And Doesn't Mean, Douglas D. Scherer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Searching For The Intent Of The Framers Of Fourteenth Amendment , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Searching For The Intent Of The Framers Of Fourteenth Amendment , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
IN 1946 JUSTICE HUGO BLACK DECLARED that one of the objects of the fourteenth amendment was to apply the Bill of Rights to the States. He was confident that an analysis of the intent of the framers of the amendment would support his assertion. A few years later the Supreme Court requested such an investigation, but when the analysis was made and the results presented to it, the Supreme Court concluded that the framers' intent could not be determined. The uncertainty surrounding the intent of the framers of the fourteenth amendment has had profound implications on the application of that …
A Modern Supreme Court In A Modern World, Charles F. Curtis
A Modern Supreme Court In A Modern World, Charles F. Curtis
Vanderbilt Law Review
It is all very well, indeed it is very good, to bear down on the fact that the author of the Constitution was, and still is, "We the People of the United States." But there is more sentiment than explanation in it. We think too much about who is the author of the Constitution. Of course it was not the Convention of 1789, nor the First Congress which wrote the Bill of Rights, nor the Thirty-Ninth which wrote the Fourteenth Amendment. It was We the People, but even when we have recognized this, all we have done is recognize that …