Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Internet Law (28)
- Science and Technology Law (18)
- Intellectual Property Law (15)
- Communications Law (12)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (7)
-
- Law and Society (7)
- Consumer Protection Law (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- International Law (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (3)
- Commercial Law (3)
- Contracts (3)
- Food and Drug Law (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Medical Jurisprudence (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Economics (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Publication
-
- Rob Frieden (4)
- Scott Shackelford (3)
- Kyle Langvardt (2)
- Ran Bi (2)
- Vincent J Roth Esq (2)
-
- Adam Lamparello (1)
- Ahad Syed (1)
- Akiva A Miller (1)
- Allison L Tungate (1)
- Andrew J Daddono (1)
- Andrew Leahey (1)
- Angela Goodrum (1)
- Bill D. Herman (1)
- Chang Zhou (1)
- Fazal Khan (1)
- Hussam M. Alkanbashi (1)
- Jeffrey A. Van Detta (1)
- Jesse D Lively (1)
- John M. Newman (1)
- Jorge L Contreras (1)
- Julian Dibbell (1)
- Michael A. Alao (1)
- Miquel Peguera (1)
- Nicholas A Wolfe (1)
- Richard Sanvenero Jr. (1)
- Timothy A Wiseman (1)
Articles 31 - 34 of 34
Full-Text Articles in Computer Law
Social Media And Our Misconceptions Of The Realities, Richard Sanvenero Jr.
Social Media And Our Misconceptions Of The Realities, Richard Sanvenero Jr.
Richard Sanvenero Jr.
This article will review the current laws of the expectations of privacy under the two-pronged Katz test, and more specifically other cases that the courts have tried to interpret the test as applicable to social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and e-mail. Since there seems to be “no light at the end of the tunnel” with any uniform decision within the courts on the Fourth Amendment protections against search and seizure when there is a reasonable expectation of privacy with social media. This reasonable expectation standard is developed by the users themselves who will allow their rights to be …
Fixing Frand: A Pseudo-Pool Approach To Standards-Based Patent Licensing, Jorge Contreras
Fixing Frand: A Pseudo-Pool Approach To Standards-Based Patent Licensing, Jorge Contreras
Jorge L Contreras
Technical interoperability standards are critical elements of mobile telephones, laptop computers, digital files, and thousands of other products in the modern networked economy. Most such standards are developed in so-called voluntary standards-development organizations (SDOs) that require participants to license patents essential to the standard on terms that are “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory” (FRAND). FRAND commitments are thought to avoid the problem of patent hold-up: the imposition of excessive royalty demands after a standard has been widely adopted in the market. While, at first blush, FRAND commitments seem to assure product vendors that patents will not obstruct the manufacture and sale …
Desktop Piracy Factories: Will Existing Law Be Enough?, Andrew J. Daddono
Desktop Piracy Factories: Will Existing Law Be Enough?, Andrew J. Daddono
Andrew J Daddono
A brief essay on how the disruptive technology found in 3D printing will affect the future of our existing legal regimes for intellectual property, what foreseeable problems there are, and possible ways that we may address them.
Copyright Freeconomics, John M. Newman
Copyright Freeconomics, John M. Newman
John M. Newman
Innovation has wreaked creative destruction on traditional content platforms. During the decade following Napster’s rise and fall, industry organizations launched litigation campaigns to combat the dramatic downward pricing pressure created by the advent of zero-price, copyright-infringing content. These campaigns attracted a torrent of debate, still ongoing, among scholars and stakeholders—but this debate has missed the forest for the trees. Industry organizations have abandoned litigation efforts, and many copyright owners now compete directly with infringing products by offering licit content at a price of $0.
This sea change has ushered in an era of “copyright freeconomics.” Drawing on an emerging body …