Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (134)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (104)
- Legislation (89)
- First Amendment (41)
- Internet Law (34)
-
- Consumer Protection Law (21)
- Constitutional Law (20)
- Science and Technology Law (15)
- Litigation (12)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (10)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Computer Law (7)
- Law and Politics (7)
- Law and Economics (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Intellectual Property Law (5)
- Communication (4)
- Computer Engineering (4)
- Digital Communications and Networking (4)
- Engineering (4)
- Privacy Law (4)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Juvenile Law (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (3)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (159)
- University of Michigan Law School (42)
- University of Richmond (14)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
-
- New York Law School (5)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- BLR (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (148)
- Michigan Law Review (13)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (12)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (11)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (10)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (9)
- Villanova Law Review (8)
- Articles (5)
- Articles & Chapters (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- PIJIP Faculty Scholarship (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Duquesne Law Review (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- IUSTITIA (1)
- Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (1)
- Journal of Law and Mobility (1)
- Law Librarian Scholarship (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 270
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
Deregulating The Second Republic, Andrew C. Barrett
Deregulating The Second Republic, Andrew C. Barrett
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Toward Regulation That Fosters Competition, Reed Hundt
Toward Regulation That Fosters Competition, Reed Hundt
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Stanley S. Hubbard
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Stanley S. Hubbard
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fcc Plus Sixty, Larry King
Up With The Fcc: An Essay Of Esteem For The Commission On Its Sixtieth Birthday, Abner J. Mikva
Up With The Fcc: An Essay Of Esteem For The Commission On Its Sixtieth Birthday, Abner J. Mikva
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Second Chance, Newton N. Minow
Second Chance, Newton N. Minow
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act, Susan Ness
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act, Susan Ness
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Unfinished Task Of Spectrum Policy Reform, Janice Obuchowski
The Unfinished Task Of Spectrum Policy Reform, Janice Obuchowski
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Q'S World: The Future Of Broadcast Regulation, James H. Quello
Q'S World: The Future Of Broadcast Regulation, James H. Quello
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reinventing Fcc Adjudication, Sidney White Rhyne
Reinventing Fcc Adjudication, Sidney White Rhyne
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
In The Battle Over Tv Violence, The Communications Act Should Be Cheered, Not Changed!, Carl R. Ramey
In The Battle Over Tv Violence, The Communications Act Should Be Cheered, Not Changed!, Carl R. Ramey
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Joel Rosenbloom
On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Joel Rosenbloom
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Challenge Of Choice, Richard E. Wiley
The Challenge Of Choice, Richard E. Wiley
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Call For Collaboration, Michael J. Zpevak
A Call For Collaboration, Michael J. Zpevak
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Adrian Cronauer's "The Fairness Doctrine", Robert P. Rhodes
Commentary On Adrian Cronauer's "The Fairness Doctrine", Robert P. Rhodes
Federal Communications Law Journal
Symposium: The Transformation of Television News
The Fairness Doctrine: A Solution In Search Of A Problem, Adrian Cronauer
The Fairness Doctrine: A Solution In Search Of A Problem, Adrian Cronauer
Federal Communications Law Journal
The "Fairness Doctrine" refers to a former policy of the Federal Communications Commission wherein a broadcast station which presented one viewpoint on a controversial public issue had to afford the opposing viewpoint an opportunity to be heard. The FCC ceased to enforce the doctrine in 1987, reasoning that the doctrine actually decreased the viewpoints heard by discouraging broadcasters from covering controversial issues out of fear of censure by the FCC. The Author explores the historical development of the Fairness Doctrine and examines the flaws with the different rationales upon which the doctrine is based. The Autho concludes that today's marketplace …
Public Access: Fortifying The Electronic Soapbox, Jason Roberts
Public Access: Fortifying The Electronic Soapbox, Jason Roberts
Federal Communications Law Journal
Public access, viewed as the voice on cable for those outside the mainstream, has recently been criticized as nothing more than an unregulated channel for objectionable hate speech and indecent programming. When Congress passed the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, cable operators found themselves in the conflicting role of being liable for indecent and obscene programming on public access, while at the same time unable to exercise any editorial control over access content. All sides are now waiting to see if the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will strike down these access rules as …
Preemption Of Local Regulation Of Radio Antennas: A Post- Deerfield Policy For The Fcc, James R. Hobson, Jeffrey O. Moreno
Preemption Of Local Regulation Of Radio Antennas: A Post- Deerfield Policy For The Fcc, James R. Hobson, Jeffrey O. Moreno
Federal Communications Law Journal
The proliferation of novel radio delivery systems has resulted in the construction of new forms of radio antennas. Many localities have placed restrictions on the size and/or placement of these antennas, significantly hindering or blocking signal reception. Because the FCC has adopted rules that only partially preempt local regulations, municipalities have enacted laws restricting the use of home satellite dishes. A recent challenge to one such regulation resulted in a Second Circuit decision limiting the scope of FCC review of local regulations. The Authors suggest that the FCC need not take extreme measures such as total preemption or national zoning …
Letter Of Introduction, Reed E. Hunt
Letter Of Introduction, Reed E. Hunt
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Abortion On The Air: Broadcasters And Indecent Political Advertising, Milagros Rivera-Sanchez, Paul H. Gates Jr.
Abortion On The Air: Broadcasters And Indecent Political Advertising, Milagros Rivera-Sanchez, Paul H. Gates Jr.
Federal Communications Law Journal
Section 315(a) of the Communications Act--the anti-censorship provision--allows for the presentation of candidates' unvarnished positions on issues important to the voting public. In the 1990s, ads centered around abortion caused a collision between the interests of political candidates and broadcasters. The Article reviews broadcasters' attempts to use the indecency provisions of the Communications Act to channel controversial political advertisements. The Authors conclude that airing potentially indecent political ads is unlikely to result in sanctions for broadcasters.
The Children's Hour Revisited: The Children's Television Act Of 1990, Diane Aden Hayes
The Children's Hour Revisited: The Children's Television Act Of 1990, Diane Aden Hayes
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Children's Television Act of 1990 was created to reduce advertising during children's programming and increase the number of educational programs for children. But by 1993 media watchers found that violations were frequent, and that what was purported to be educational television was often little more than cartoons. This Note argues that the apparent failure of the Act stems primarily from its vague standards. To correct these problems, more explicit regulations are necessary. Because new regulations can only go so far before they invade broadcasters' First Amendment rights, broadcasters and the FCC will have to compromise to create a workable …
The Future Of Communications Policymaking, Fred H. Cate
The Future Of Communications Policymaking, Fred H. Cate
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Reforming Fcc Regulation Of Dominant Telephone Carriers: Putting Some Teeth Into The Test For Predation, Thomas K. Gump
Reforming Fcc Regulation Of Dominant Telephone Carriers: Putting Some Teeth Into The Test For Predation, Thomas K. Gump
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note examines the ineffective protections against predatory pricing by AT&T contained in the price cap scheme. Part I outlines price cap regulation and explains how the FCC hopes that a test based on the average variable cost standard will detect predatory pricing. Part II argues that the FCC erred in adopting an average variable cost standard as the test for telecommunications predation because that standard ignores the high fixed costs common to all firms in the industry. Part II demonstrates that AT&T could engage in predatory pricing despite the protections contained in the regulatory scheme. Part II then examines …
American Broadcasting And The First Amendment, René L. Todd
American Broadcasting And The First Amendment, René L. Todd
Michigan Law Review
A Review of American Broadcasting and the First Amendment by Lucas A. Powe, Jr.
The Fcc And Five Years Of The Cable Communications Policy Act Of 1984: Tuning Out The Consumer?, Mark R. Herring
The Fcc And Five Years Of The Cable Communications Policy Act Of 1984: Tuning Out The Consumer?, Mark R. Herring
University of Richmond Law Review
The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the "Cable Act") was a comprehensive amendment to the Communications Act of 1934. The Cable Act established the national policy for the regulation of the cable television industry. The focus of the Cable Act and the administrative rules implementing the act has been on the relationship between franchising municipal authorities and cable television operators. Congress addressed some consumer issues in the Cable Act such as subscriber privacy, commercial access channels, and public, educational, and governmental ("PEG") channels.
"In Stark Contravention Of Its Purpose": Federal Communications Commission Enforcement And Repeal Of The Fairness Doctrine, Michael J. Bolton
"In Stark Contravention Of Its Purpose": Federal Communications Commission Enforcement And Repeal Of The Fairness Doctrine, Michael J. Bolton
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note analyzes current FCC policy to determine whether the agency violated its statutory purpose and acted unlawfully by restricting and later repealing the fairness doctrine. Because the Commission's attack on the doctrine has been based, in part, on conclusions drawn from the doctrine's history, Part I examines prior FCC enforcement of the fairness doctrine. Part II views the Commission's contemporary enforcement and repeal of the doctrine. Finally, Part III assesses Commission action in light of its legislative mandate and administrative law standards of judicial review to conclude that the FCC both violated its administrative responsibilities by deemphasizing enforcement of …
Misregulating Television: Network Dominance And The Fcc, Robert R. Morse Jr.
Misregulating Television: Network Dominance And The Fcc, Robert R. Morse Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Misregulating Television: Network Dominance and the FCC by Stanley M. Besen, Thomas G. Krattenmaker, A. Richard Metzger, Jr. and John R. Woodbury
New Video Technologies In The United States: Regulatory And Intellectual Property Considerations, Michael Botein
New Video Technologies In The United States: Regulatory And Intellectual Property Considerations, Michael Botein
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Sports Broadcasting And The Law, Robert Alan Garrett, Philip R. Hochberg
Sports Broadcasting And The Law, Robert Alan Garrett, Philip R. Hochberg
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Cable Television Update-Capital Cities Cable, Inc. V. Crisp: Federalism And Frustration Of Powers, Steven J. Keeler
Cable Television Update-Capital Cities Cable, Inc. V. Crisp: Federalism And Frustration Of Powers, Steven J. Keeler
University of Richmond Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stunned the cable television industry with its decision in Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp. The immediate result of the ruling was to preempt a state statute prohibiting the advertisement of certain alcoholic beverages; however, the decision's potential impact could be much broader. The Court unanimously held cable television regulation to be the "exclusive domain" of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an "area that the Commission has explicitly pre-empted." Thus, the decision extends broad regulatory authority to the FCC at the expense of local control.