Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Broadcasting (3)
- Cable television (2)
- FCC (2)
- Book Reviews (1)
- Cable Television (1)
-
- Communications Act of 1934 (1)
- Confidential sources (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Cross ownership (1)
- Don R. Le Duc (1)
- Fair use (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Freedom of the press (1)
- Journalist's privilege (1)
- Journalists (1)
- Media (1)
- Media ownership (1)
- Performance (1)
- Press freedom (1)
- Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 (1)
- Public broadcasting (1)
- Public forums (1)
- Public television (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Shield laws (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
Book Review Of Cable Television And The Fcc: A Crisis In Media Control, Jacob W. Mayer
Book Review Of Cable Television And The Fcc: A Crisis In Media Control, Jacob W. Mayer
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Broadcasting And The Problem Of Government Influence: Towards A Legislative Solution, Oscar G. Chase
Public Broadcasting And The Problem Of Government Influence: Towards A Legislative Solution, Oscar G. Chase
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This article will explore the problems raised by the emergence of the federal government as a television "sponsor." It will argue that fundamental structural reform is needed to promote the constitutional values at issue, that such reform will also promote the interests of local control sought by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, and that legislative action in furtherance of this structural solution is desirable. In this context this article will consider the proposed Public Broadcasting Financing Act of 1974 and will argue that any bill modeled on it would not eliminate the problems despite its salutary innovations. Not considered, …
Cable, Copyright, Communications: Controversy, Lee Fisher, Sam Salah
Cable, Copyright, Communications: Controversy, Lee Fisher, Sam Salah
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will examine the efforts of the courts, the legislature, and the Federal Communications Com-mission (FCC) to apply the Copyright Act of 1909 to the technological developments of the twentieth century. It is submitted that the significance of Teleprompter lies not in the Court's determination that there was no copyright infringement -for that finding will soon be negated by upcoming copyright law revision -but in the inability of the Court to discard past inflexible and unrealistic approaches to the 1909 Copyright Act. Offered is a different method of viewing cable communications in terms of the Copyright Act, which recognizes …
Shield Laws: Partial Solution To A Pervasive Problem, Robert M. O'Neil
Shield Laws: Partial Solution To A Pervasive Problem, Robert M. O'Neil
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Lot Is Cast Into The Lap: Federal Communications Commission Mistreatment Of State Lottery Broadcasts, Peter Petrakis
The Lot Is Cast Into The Lap: Federal Communications Commission Mistreatment Of State Lottery Broadcasts, Peter Petrakis
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Case And Materials On Federal Regulation Of The Electronic Media, Michael Botein
Case And Materials On Federal Regulation Of The Electronic Media, Michael Botein
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Citizen Participation In The Regulation Of Cable Television, Michael Botein
Citizen Participation In The Regulation Of Cable Television, Michael Botein
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Considerations Of Multiple Media Ownership Regulation By The Federal Communications Commission, Jon L. Mills, John Moynahan, Richard Perlini, George Mcclure
The Constitutional Considerations Of Multiple Media Ownership Regulation By The Federal Communications Commission, Jon L. Mills, John Moynahan, Richard Perlini, George Mcclure
UF Law Faculty Publications
Promoting the dissemination of diverse ideas with a minimum of governmental interference is the goal of the first amendment in protecting free press and free media. This goal is implicit in the public interest mandate of the Communications Act of 1934. A precise balance between restraint and diversity in first amendment policy appears impossible, but the process of decision should reflect both, with deference to restraint where possible. The Federal Communication Commission's Order in Docket 18110 failed to strike such a balance; any future action regarding cross-ownership of broadcast stations by newspapers would benefit by an increased recognition of the …