Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Civil society (2)
-
- Disparate Impact (2)
- Fair Housing (2)
- General Law (2)
- Housing (2)
- Housing Law (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Land Use Planning (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Social Welfare (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Black rights; civil rights; blacks and the law; NAACP (1)
- Civic infrastructure (1)
- Clinical legal education (1)
- Community development (1)
- Community organization (1)
- Democratic accountability (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Neoliberalism (1)
- Police/community relations (1)
- Politics (1)
- Protest (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Rebellious lawyering (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Justice Thurgood Marshall: A Selected Bibliography, Ruth A. Hodges
Justice Thurgood Marshall: A Selected Bibliography, Ruth A. Hodges
Moorland Spingarn Research Center Publications
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of Disparate Impact: An Opportunity To Realize The Promise Of The Fair Housing Act, Valerie Schneider
In Defense Of Disparate Impact: An Opportunity To Realize The Promise Of The Fair Housing Act, Valerie Schneider
School of Law Faculty Publications
Abstract:
Twice in the past three years, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Fair Housing cases, and, each time, under pressure from civil rights leaders who feared that the Supreme Court might narrow current Fair Housing Act jurisprudence, the cases settled just weeks before oral argument. Settlements after the Supreme Court grants certiorari are extremely rare, and, in these cases, the settlements reflect a substantial fear among civil rights advocates that the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in cases such as Shelby County v. Holder and Fisher v. University of Texas are working to dismantle many of the protections of …
Ferguson, The Rebellious Law Professor, And The Neoliberal University, Harold A. Mcdougall Iii
Ferguson, The Rebellious Law Professor, And The Neoliberal University, Harold A. Mcdougall Iii
School of Law Faculty Publications
Neoliberalism, a business-oriented ideology promoting corporatism, profit-seeking, and elite management, has found its way into the modern American university. As neoliberal ideology envelops university campuses, the idea of law professors as learned academicians and advisors to students as citizens in training, has given way to the concept of professors as brokers of marketable skills with students as consumers. In a legal setting, this concept pushes law students to view their education not as a means to contribute to society and the professional field, but rather as a means to make money. These developments are especially problematic for minority students and …
In Defense Of Disparate Impact: An Opportunity To Realize The Promise Of The Fair Housing Act, Valerie Schneider
In Defense Of Disparate Impact: An Opportunity To Realize The Promise Of The Fair Housing Act, Valerie Schneider
Valerie Schneider
Abstract:
Twice in the past three years, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Fair Housing cases, and, each time, under pressure from civil rights leaders who feared that the Supreme Court might narrow current Fair Housing Act jurisprudence, the cases settled just weeks before oral argument. Settlements after the Supreme Court grants certiorari are extremely rare, and, in these cases, the settlements reflect a substantial fear among civil rights advocates that the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in cases such as Shelby County v. Holder and Fisher v. University of Texas are working to dismantle many of the protections of …
Social Change Requires Civic Infrastructure, Harold A. Mcdougall Iii
Social Change Requires Civic Infrastructure, Harold A. Mcdougall Iii
School of Law Faculty Publications
Article explores how civil society might become sufficiently organized to hold business accountable beyond consumer choice, and government beyond merely voting.