Civil Procedure Commons^™

Constitutional Law - Protective Orders Prohibiting Publication Of Information Obtained Through Discovery, Joseph A. Almeida

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Propriety Of The Federal Common Law, Jeanne Proko-Elkins

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Procedure And Practice, W. Hamilton Bryson

University of Richmond Law Review

This article considers recent developments in the field of Virginia civil procedure and practice, including statutes, rules of court, and opinions of the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals of Virginia that have appeared between May 1986 and May 1987. This article also comments on cases in volumes five through eight of Virginia Circuit Court Opinions, many of which were decided before 1986. It is appropriate to mention them here since they were only recently made generally available through publication. In order to facilitate the discussion of numerous Virginia Code sections, they will be referred to in …

Sovereign Immunity From Statutes Of Limitation In Maryland, Thomas A. Bowden

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rehnquist, Recusal, And Reform, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

In September 1986, the Senate confirmed William H. Rehnquist as Chief Justice of the United States by a vote of 66 to 33, an unusually close vote for a successful Supreme Court nominee. Although Justice Rehnquist’s elevation from Associate to Chief Justice engendered substantial criticism because of his judicial philosophy, past political activity, and possible views on race relations, the most serious threat to his nomination arose from his decision fifteen years earlier to sit and cast the deciding vote in a Supreme Court case in which many questioned both his impartiality and his candor. That Justice Rehnquist's role in …

Appealability, Under The Collateral Order Doctrine, Of Orders Denying Motions For Appointment Of Counsel In Federal Civil Litigation After Richardson-Merrell, Inc. V. Koller, Kevin G. Dumbach

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Alternative Dispute Resolution In The Federal Government: A View From Congress, Senator Orrin G. Hatch

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rent Control Price Fixing: Another Look At The Emperor's New Clothes, Robert N. Markle

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Precluding Government Relitigation Of Statutory Interpretations: Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency V. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Bradley Bishop Jones

Seattle University Law Review

This Note explores the issue of the applicability of the preclusion doctrines against the government. Specific focus is placed upon the doctrines’ application in cases where the government has previously litigated a question of statutory interpretation. The exploration begins with the recent case of Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Clark-Cowlitz), a classic factual setting for analyzing this issue. The Note then briefly examines the historical developments of the preclusion doctrines and the United States Supreme Court’s recent and continuing struggle with the application of the doctrines against the government. It is the position of …

Proof Of Claim Forms And Discovery Of Absent Class Members: Violations Of Rule 23 Policy Or Essential Devices?

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Litigating The Zero-Sum Game: The Effect Of Institutional Reform Litigation On Absent Parties, Elizabeth G. Thornburg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

This article considers the impact that the use and misuse of equitable interest balancing has had on institutional reform litigation. It begins by considering the types of cases in which interest balancing was originally used in equity, and then surveys the use of interest balancing in school desegregation and employment discrimination cases. The article argues that the Supreme Court's interest balancing is flawed in systemic ways that result in overvaluing non-party interests.

Rule 19 And The Public Rights Exception To Party Joinder, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

The increasing number of "public interest" lawsuits suggests that federal courts increasingly will confront difficult party joinder questions posed by such litigation. These problems arise because entities not involved in the litigation may have interests that may be adversely affected by the litigation. The joinder issue presented by such cases is whether rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the suit be dismissed or whether the litigation can continue without joinder of the absent entities. Numerous courts have dealt with the question by creating a 'public rights exception," which permits the litigation to continue even without …

Civil Procedure, Kurt L. Krieger

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reforming West Virginia's Jury Selection Process: West Virginia Jury Selection And Service Legislation Of 1986, Keith A. George

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Stepping On Board The Rule 11 Bandwagon, Roger M. Baron

Cleveland State Law Review

Prior to the 1983 amendments to Rule 11, there was some concern as to whether or not the Federal Rules had adequate provisions to insure the truthfulness of allegations in pleadings and motions. With the 1983 incorporation of an objective standard of reasonableness, subjective good faith was eliminated as a defense. Whether anticipated or not, the federal courts have now become flooded with litigation concerning the new Rule 11. Certain differences do exist among the circuits; however the differences are relatively minor, relating primarily to each circuit's description of the conduct which violates the relevant standards and to the standard …

A Synthesis And Integration Of Supreme Court Precedent Regarding The Regulatory Taking Of Land, John W. Ragsdale Jr

Faculty Works

In the post World War II era of rapid land development, emergent environmental problems, and heightened legislative response, the taking clause has proved to be the most pervasive and significant limitation on the power of government over private land usage. The dimensions and implications of this provision and the interpretive Supreme Court opinions have attracted the attention of numerous scholars whose efforts, usually, have been rather critical. The authors have often sought to question the logic, language and premises of fundamental opinions, to warn of the economic, moral and ecological consequences of portended judicial trends, to pose new taking tests …

Statutes Of Limitation And Section 1983: Implications For Illinois Civil Rights Law, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 415 (1987), Brian Kibble-Smith

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Moving To Dismiss A Civil Rico Action, David J. Howard

Cleveland State Law Review

The use and abuse of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") has troubled judges and lawyers for some time while providing fertile ground for commentators. The plethora of RICO cases is equaled only by the tremendous proliferation of commentary. This Article, while admittedly contributing to this proliferation, is excusable, however, because its purpose is to facilitate summary disposition of RICO claims by providing a practical guide to achieving early dismissal under Rules 12(b)(6) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is impossible to set forth all grounds for dismissing every RICO complaint. The scope of …

Justice Scalia: Standing, Environmental Law And The Supreme Court, Michael A. Perino

Faculty Publications

President Reagan's appointment of Antonin Scalia to the United States Supreme Court raises concern among liberals that Justice Scalia will help lead the Court away from a number of liberal positions toward a new conservatism. The Reagan Administration's requirement that judicial appointments advance the Administration's preference for judicial restraint and strict constructionism enhances this concern. These new executive requirements mean that federal courts should accord greater authority to the democratically elected branches of the government. Justice Scalia's primary areas of study, administrative law and separation of powers, reflect his adherence to judicial self-restraint.

One aspect of administrative law and separation …

The Compatibility Of A Federal Magistrate's Final Judgment With Nonmutual Issue Preclusion , Allison G. Danzig

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Note examines the propriety of issue preclusion as applied to a magistrate's factual determination by providing an overview of section 636(c) of the Magistrate Act of 1979 and the decisions holding its provisions constitutional. It briefly looks at the expanded use of issue preclusion, which is largely due to the elimination of the mutuality agreement. After reviewing the policies that are promoted through the use of issue preclusion in such a manner, the Note concludes that nonmutual issue preclusion should apply to a magistrate's determination in a civil trial only if the parties are aware of the consequences that …

Rethinking The Teaching Of Civil Procedure, Elizabeth M. Schneider

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Fairness And Feres: A Critique Of The Presumption Of Injustice, Joan M. Bernott

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mass And Repetitive Litigation In The Federal Courts, Edward H. Cooper

Articles

The topic of "Mass and Repetitive Litigation in the Federal Courts" is even more vast and unwieldy than the complex litigations it brings to mind. The implicit assignment to address the topic by contemplating the events that may occur over the next century is still more daunting. One hundred years bring untellable changes to all of our social and political institutions, judicial and otherwise. Rather than attempt to meet the challenge by uttering bold prophecies of the circumstances that will confront our successors of the future, I will follow an easier course. This paper will select a few illustrations of …

Whether Disclosure Of Work Product To A Witness In Preparation For Testifying Waives The Protection Of Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 26(B)(3), Gene Lynn Humphreys

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Regulation Of Entrepreneurial Litigation: Balancing Fairness And Efficiency In The Large Class Action, John C. Coffee Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

Just as war is too important to be left to generals, civil procedure – with apologies to Clemenceau – is too important to be left to proceduralists. Although it would be a serious overstatement to claim that all civil procedure scholars are confined by a tunnel vision focused only on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, they have as a group been reluctant to engage explicitly in incentive-based reasoning and seem particularly hesitant to reexamine what they must know to be a noble myth: namely, that the client can and should control all litigation decisions. Within an important and expanding …

Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: A Comment, Tom Campbell

Tom Campbell

No abstract provided.