Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Free And Clear Sale Under Section 363 Of The Bankruptcy Code Prevents Successor Liability, Matthew Bopp

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor to sell its assets free and clear of any interest in such property, pursuant to section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 363(f) is used to allow the trustee to sell assets not in the ordinary course of business and to allow purchasers to buy assets without the fear of liability. The Bankruptcy Code does not define the term “interest.” Thus, in interpreting section 363(f), a court must view interest in property expansively. Using section 363(f), courts have extinguished several types of claims and interest in property including: possessory interests, employment related claims, …

Handcuffing Of A Bankrupt, Dr> Hussein Yousef Ghanayem

UAEU Law Journal

Handcuffing of a bankrupt is the act of banning a person from administering, litigating or disposing of his personal property and assigning that to a trustee (administrator of bankruptcy). It comes forth in execution and pursuance of the judgement of declaration of bankruptcy.

In ancient days, the body of the debtor as well as his personal property were exposed to execution. He was sold or slaved, or his corpse was apportioned among his creditors. It was well known that " He who cannot pay with his purse pays with his skin”.

The object of handcuffing a bankrupt is twofold: (a) …

City’S Retention Of Impounded Vehicle Not Violation Of Automatic Stay, Alexis Zobeideh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Upon the filing of a petition under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), creditors and other parties in interest are generally automatically stayed from taking any action against a debtor or property of the estate. The estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as the commencement of the case,” with some exceptions. The automatic stay is “one of the most important protections and powerful tools available to a debtor in a bankruptcy.”

It is well established that a creditor cannot take affirmative steps against a debtor or estate property. Prior …

Constraints On The Breadth Of A Bankruptcy Trustee’S Power To Demand A Turnover Of Assets, Timothy Diprisco

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) empowers bankruptcy trustees to compel entities to turn over property to the bankruptcy estate. Property subject to the turnover provision includes “all legal and equitable interests of the debtor in property at the commencement of the case.” Although the Bankruptcy Code is federal law, property interests are still defined by state law. Occasionally, bankruptcy trustees claim property as part of the estate that courts later deem is beyond the breadth of their authority.

This memorandum examines the extent of a bankruptcy trustee’s power to compel turnover of assets. Part …

Exploring The Scope Of The Property Requirement Of Section 109(A) In Chapter 11 And 15 Cases, Rasha El Mouatassim Bih

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 109 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States . . . may be a debtor.” In In re Barnet, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that debtor eligibility requirements of section 109 apply to a debtor in recognition proceedings under chapter 15. If a debtor does not have a domicile or place of business in the United States, as is often the case with foreign debtors, then …

Three Against Two: On The Difference Between Property And Contract And The Example Of Deposit Accounts In Bankruptcy, Jeanne L. Schroeder, David G. Carlson

Articles

In Citizen's Bank v. Strumpf (1995), Justice Scalia announced that deposit accounts are not "property". Five years later, the Uniform Commercial Code was amended to make deposit accounts collateral for the depositary bank maintaining the account, thereby crowding the field previously occupied by the common law right of setoff. Security interests attach to personal "property." Security interests attach to deposit accounts. Deposit accounts, by syllogistic logic, are property. Does this mean that the UCC has overruled the Supreme Court? We argue not. A deposit account is a mere contract in the two-person universe that contract law presupposes. A deposit account …

Fraudulent Transfer Provision Of The Bankruptcy Code Defined More Narrowly Than Similar Provisions In Other Statutes, Yaakov Seff

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The fraudulent conveyance provision of the Bankruptcy Code, (“the Code”), Section 548, is an “elemental and ancient provision of debtor-creditor relations.” It provides that “[t]he trustee may avoid any transfer ... of an interest of the debtor in property ... that was made ... within two years before the date of the filing of the petition . . .” where the transfer involved actual or constructive fraud.

But the ability to avoid fraudulent transfers is not limited to the bankruptcy context; parallel provisions are found in several areas of the federal legislation. For instance, there is a fraudulent transfer …

The Federal Law Of Property: The Case Of Inheritance Disclaimers And Tenancy By The Entireties, David Gray Carlson

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Federal Law Of Property: The Case Of Inheritance Disclaimers And Tenancy By The Entireties, David G. Carlson

Articles

The Supreme Court has issued two disturbing tax opinions which disrupt the notion that “property” (when used in federal statutes) refers to state-law notions. In Drye v. United States, the Supreme Court pierced the Arkansas fiction that inheritance disclaimers are retrospective in effect. Thus the Internal Revenue could claim that a tax lien attached to the pre-disclaimer inheritance. Disclaimer could not defeat this lien. In United States v. Craft, the Supreme Court pierced the Michigan fiction that a tenancy by the entireties does not belong to the individual spouses but, rather, the a corporate “marital” entity that is a separate …

Limited Liability Property, Danielle D'Onfro

Scholarship@WashULaw

This Article offers a theory of secured credit that aims to answer fundamental questions that have long percolated in the bankruptcy and secured transactions literatures. Are security interests property rights, contract rights, or something else? Why do secured creditors enjoy a priority right that, in bankruptcy, requires them to be paid in full before other debt holders recover anything? Should we care that secured credit creates distributional unfairness when companies cannot pay their debts?

This Article argues that security interests are best understood as a form of “limited liability property.” Limited liability—the privilege of being legally shielded from liability that …

Limited Liability Property, Danielle D'Onfro

Scholarship@WashULaw

This Article offers a theory of secured credit that aims to answer fundamental questions that have long percolated in the bankruptcy and secured transactions literatures. Are security interests property rights, contract rights, or something else? Why do secured creditors enjoy a priority right that, in bankruptcy, requires them to be paid in full before other debt holders recover anything? Should we care that secured credit creates distributional unfairness when companies cannot pay their debts?

This Article argues that security interests are best understood as a form of “limited liability property.” Limited liability—the privilege of being legally shielded from liability that …

Ln Mgmt. Llc Series 5105 Portraits Place V. Green Tree Loan Servicing Llc, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 55 (Aug. 03, 2017), Wesley Lemay Jr.

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

If a homeowner that owns property in Nevada but declares bankruptcy in Texas and fails to list the Home Owners Association (HOA) as a creditor, the HOA cannot violate the automatic stay imposed by the bankruptcy and sell the property. If the property is sold in violation of the automatic stay, the sale is invalid. Under Ninth Circuit law, the sale is void ab initio while the Fifth Circuit holds that these types of sales are voidable, but can be approved by the bankruptcy court.

"No Harm, Still Foul": Unharmed Creditors And Avoidance Of A Debtor's Pre-Petition Transfer Of Exemptible Property, Alyssa Pompei

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note sides with the “no harm, no foul” approach in this debate, arguing that bankruptcy courts should not avoid prepetition transfers of otherwise exempt property under § 548 simply because an exemption was not actually taken and the transfer was instead the alternative path used to shield the property from collection. Part I of this Note explains the constructive fraud and exemption provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, including state opt-out provisions which are particularly applicable to this issue. Part I also discusses the legislative history of federal bankruptcy law with particular focus on the creation of the Bankruptcy …

Conflict In The Bankruptcy Code: Ramification Of A Trustee’S 363(F) Right To Sell Property “Free And Clear” On The Lessee’S 365(H) Right To Retain Property, Aaron Leaf

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 363(f) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) allows a trustee to sell property “free and clear of any interest in such property” that a third party might have if certain conditions are met. Section 365(h) of the Bankruptcy Code allows the lessee of a rejected lease to either retain the property with all rights appurtenant to the estate, or treat such lease as terminated and sue for damages. Courts are split on if these sections of the Bankruptcy Code are compatible. The majority of courts have found these sections are not compatible, and …

The Secured Party And His Nemesis, The Trustee In Bankruptcy: After-Acquired Property, Unidentified Proceeds, And Selected Preference Problems, John P. Finan

Akron Law Review

A trustee in bankruptcy, in addition to succeeding to the rights of the bankrupt,' has several avoiding powers. Some of these avoiding powers are based on practices which, like vice, are of "so frightful mien that to be hated [need] but to be seen." Preferences may not be included among such practices. Indeed, the English view exhibits ambivalence towards preferences. At one time it regarded "preferences [as] the good fortune of the creditor." A later view was "that the preferring of one creditor over others within a short time of bankruptcy and in contemplation thereof, was a 'fraud on the …

Foreign Debt - Act Of State Doctrine - Unilateral Deferral Of Obligations By Debtor Nations Is Inconsistent With United States Law And Policy: Allied Bank International V. Banco Credito Agricola De Cartago, Marc J. Lewyn

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Shooing The Vultures Away From The Consumer Bankruptcy Carcass: Attorney Fees Owed By Debtors For Marital Dissolution Are Not Domestic Support Obligations, Christopher V. Davis

University of Massachusetts Law Review

This Note will focus on consumer bankruptcy related to chapter 7 and chapter 13 filings. Section I provides an introduction to DSOs and the goals of enforcing them through bankruptcy. Section I also discusses the impact of DSO status on the automatic stay, discharge, priority status for property distribution of the bankruptcy estate, capability to reach exempt property, and application to attorney fees. Section II argues that, where attorney fees are not owed to a spouse, former spouse, or child, and do not fit within an impact exception, the fees are not DSOs, but instead are merely general non-secured claims. …

The Changing Practice Of Bankruptcy Law: An Analysis Of How Bankruptcy Practice Has Changed In The Last Decade, Michael Goldstein, Samantha Einhorn, Jill L. Phillips

University of Massachusetts Law Review

The practice of bankruptcy law has changed drastically over the last decade. An attorney starting out in the field in 2009 faces different issue than one who began in 1999. However, it’s not just the issues that come up with clients that make the practice so different, but the law of bankruptcy itself has changed. The economic downturn of the last eighteen months has changed the way the public views bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 and In re Bateman, a case decided in 2008, altered the landscape of bankruptcy practice forever. This article will walk through a …

Time For Change: Bringing Massachusetts Homestead And Personal Property Exemptions Into The Twenty-First Century, Lee Harrington

University of Massachusetts Law Review

There are presently two pieces of legislation pending on Beacon Hill that are intended to offer amendments to the Homestead Statute and Exemption Statute that would offer meaningful changes and real relief for the citizens of the Commonwealth. This article provides a brief history of the two statutory schemes, provides some comparisons to the schemes in other states, and highlights the changes sought by the proposed amendments.

S-Corp And Qsub Tax Status As Property Of The Bankruptcy Estate, Ryan Jennings

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under the Internal Revenue Code, a corporation can elect to be an “S” Corporation (“S-Corp”) for federal income tax purposes. Electing for S-Corp status will make the corporation a pass through entity, meaning that the corporation itself will not have any tax benefits or liability. Instead, the company’s income will be passed on to it shareholders, who will have to report it on their personal tax returns. Similarly, an S-Corp that owns a subsidiary corporation can elect to treat it as qualified subchapter S subsidiary (“QSub”). A QSub is also a pass through entity that passes its tax benefits …

Does The “Free And Clear” Language In An Order Approving A Sale Pursuant To Section 363(F) Of The Bankruptcy Code Bar A Successor Liability Claim?, Stephanie Y. Lin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code was enacted to empower debtors to maximize the value of their bankruptcy estate for the benefit of creditors. Because the assets sold in a sale under section 363(f) (a “363 Sale”) transfer “free and clear” of “any interest in such property,” a purchaser would be more likely to pay a higher price for the assets. In turn, a higher price paid for the assets results in more available resources to distribute among the debtor’s creditors. If a claim is considered an “interest in such property” and the sale order provides that the sale …

Whether Section 522(B)(3) Of The Bankruptcy Code Contains An Implied Residency Requirement For Determining Which Exemption Scheme Applies, Christopher Mccune

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Filing a bankruptcy petition creates a bankruptcy estate consisting of all the debtor’s legal or equitable interests in property, plus any proceeds generated from the disposition of property of the estate. Once a debtor’s asset becomes property of the estate, all the debtor’s rights in that property are extinguished, unless the property is “exempted” under section 522 of the Bankruptcy Code or is otherwise abandoned back to the debtor. Accordingly, while creditors are entitled to seek reimbursement in the rest of the bankruptcy estate, the debtor may retain his or her interest in exempted property.

Thus, section 522 of …

When Is A Dog’S Tail Not A Leg?: A Property-Based Methodology For Distinguishing Sales Of Receivables From Security Interests That Secure An Obligation, Steven L. Harris, Charles W. Mooney Jr.

All Faculty Scholarship

There are two principal ways in which a firm that is owed money payable in the future but needs the money now may use its rights to payment (“receivables”) to obtain the needed financing. It might sell its receivables, or it might borrow and use the receivables as collateral to secure the loan. Different legal consequences follow depending on whether the transaction is a true sale or is a security interest that secures an obligation (a “SISO”).

These legal consequences are particularly salient when the firm enters bankruptcy. If the transaction is a sale, then the buyer can collect the …

A New Approach To Section 363(F)3, Evan F. Rosen

Michigan Law Review

Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code provides five circumstances in which a debtor may be permitted to sell property free of all claims and interests, outside of the ordinary course of business, and prior to plan confirmation. One of those five circumstances is contained in § 363(f)(3), which permits such a sale where the "interest is a lien and the price at which such property is to be sold is greater than the aggregate value of all liens on such property." While it is far from certain whether § 363(f)(3) requires a price "greater than the aggregate [face value] of …

The Case For The Tax Collector, Marie T. Reilly

Journal Articles

This article considers the question: Is a transfer of property via a noncollusive, properly conducted property tax foreclosure process entitled to respect in bankruptcy against the trustee's fraudulent transfer avoiding power? It answers this question in the affirmative. Part II examines the Court's opinion in BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp. and how courts have applied it in fraudulent transfer challenges to tax foreclosure transfers. Most courts have read BFP as requiring a comparison between the conditions under which the tax foreclosure at issue occurs and mortgage foreclosure. If the tax foreclosure process does not require public sale with competitive bidding, …

In Re Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc., Jonathan Borst

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In In re Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc., No. 08-11261(KG), 2008 WL 2951974 (Bankr. D. Del. July 28, 2008), the court held against Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc. (“Debtors”), in favor of approximately 124 consignment vendors (“Consignment Vendors”), where Debtors sought an order permitting the “free and clear” sale of all of their assets and inventory, including consigned goods from Consignment Vendors. See id. at *1–2. In order to develop a full understanding of the court’s holding, it is necessary to understand its statutory context, specifically sections 363 and 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, as well as Federal Rule of …

Effect Of Debtor’S Pre-Petition Election To Apply Tax Refund Toward Liability For Petition Year In Determination Of Property Of The Estate, Timothy Fox

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Establishing what property of the debtor will pass into the bankruptcy estate is critical to effectuating the dual purposes of the Bankruptcy Code: to grant the debtor a fresh start and to divide assets of the estate equitably among creditors. In a chapter 7 proceeding, this threshold determination divides the debtor’s assets into those that the debtor will retain and those that will be liquidated to satisfy creditors’ claims.

In determining what is property of the estate, an issue arises when before filing for bankruptcy, the debtor files a return for a pre-petition tax year and elects to apply …

Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. V. Knupfer, Thomas Scappaticci

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An important and traditional power afforded by the Bankruptcy Code to debtors and trustees is the power to sell encumbered property free and clear of any liens or encumbrances. See G COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY, App. Pt. 44, at 44-529 (Alan N. Resnick et al. eds., 15th ed. rev. 2006). One way in which this power is given to debtors and trustees is through Section 363(f)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides a mechanism for property to be sold free and clear of any liens. See 11 U.S.C. § 363(f)(3) (2006). Yet, the application of Section 363(f)(3) is not entirely …

A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp

ExpressO

The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.

In Re Adelphia Communications Corp. (Decided Dec. 5, 2003), Phillip Mahoney

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.