Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (10)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
-
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (7)
- Competition (4)
- Consumer welfare (4)
- Economics (3)
- Mergers (3)
-
- Antitrust Law (2)
- Chicago & Harvard Schools (2)
- Competition policy (2)
- FRAND (2)
- Market power (2)
- Patents (2)
- Sherman Act (2)
- & abusive acts (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative state (1)
- Agency rule (1)
- And Stockyards Administration; GIPSA; Elizabeth Warren; No-Poach; Joseph Biden; State Attorneys General; Clayton Act; Sherman Act; Donald Trump; Department of Justice; DOJ; Google; Apple; Amazon; White House; Time Warner/AT&T; Pharma; Pay-for-delay; generic drug; Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act; Section 5 of the FTC Act; Antitrust Review Act of 2019; Food and Agriculture Concentration and Market Power Review Commission; Reform Bills; Anti-Monopoly and Competition Restoration Act; AMCRA; Congressional Oversite; House Antitrust Caucus; globalization; income inequality; racial justice; NGO (1)
- Anti-competitive harm (1)
- Antitrust Lawsuits (1)
- Antitrust Litigation (1)
- Antitrust enforcement (1)
- Antitrust law & poicy (1)
- Antitrust law & policy (1)
- Antitrust regulation & policy (1)
- Antitrust; Department of Justice; DOJ; Federal Trade Commission; FTC; Trump; Obama; Bush; Google; Facebook; marijuana; media; merger; think tanks; Open Markets Institute; Institute for Local Self-Reliance; The American Economic Liberties Project; competition law; second requests; cannabis; Department of Justice's Antitrust Division; ATR; William Barr; Office of Professional Responsibilitity; OPR; Disney-Fox; AT&T/Time Warner; merger; trade regulation; Controlled Substances Act; CSA; Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; HSR; threshold concern; enforcement; investigation; Clayton Act; Automakers; Greenhouse gas; environment; gas emission; Noerr-Pennington doctring; Roy Cohn; CARES Act; COVID-19; AI; neo-Brandeisian; technology; competition; anti-competitive; monopoly; duopoly; Android; iPhone; (1)
- Antitrust; European Union; Regan Revolution; Chicago School of Law and Economics; Campaign Platforms; COVID-19; Super Tuesday; Amy Klobuchar; United States Department of Agriculture; USDA; Office of Competition Advocate; OCA; Federal Trade Commission; FTC; Bernie Sanders; Federal Trade Commission Acts; Grain Inspectors (1)
- Antritrust policy (1)
- Big Tech (1)
- Bigness (1)
- Block.one (1)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
-
- Maryland Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Law & Economics Working Papers (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Framing The Chicago School Of Antitrust Analysis, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Fiona Scott Morton
Framing The Chicago School Of Antitrust Analysis, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Fiona Scott Morton
All Faculty Scholarship
The Chicago School of antitrust has benefited from a great deal of law office history, written by admiring advocates rather than more dispassionate observers. This essay attempts a more neutral stance, looking at the ideology, political impulses, and economics that produced the Chicago School of antitrust policy and that account for its durability.
The origins of the Chicago School lie in a strong commitment to libertarianism and nonintervention. Economic models of perfect competition best suited these goals. The early strength of the Chicago School of antitrust was that it provided simple, convincing answers to everything that was wrong with antitrust …
The Post-Chicago Antitrust Revolution: A Retrospective, Christopher S. Yoo
The Post-Chicago Antitrust Revolution: A Retrospective, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
A symposium examining the contributions of the post-Chicago School provides an appropriate opportunity to offer some thoughts on both the past and the future of antitrust. This afterword reviews the excellent papers with an eye toward appreciating the contributions and limitations of both the Chicago School, in terms of promoting the consumer welfare standard and embracing price theory as the preferred mode of economic analysis, and the post-Chicago School, with its emphasis on game theory and firm-level strategic conduct. It then explores two emerging trends, specifically neo-Brandeisian advocacy for abandoning consumer welfare as the sole goal of antitrust and the …