Law Commons^™

Factual Premises Of Statutory Interpretation In Agency Review Cases, Todd S. Aagaard

Working Paper Series

This article examines factual premises of statutory interpretation in agency review cases, and proposes an approach that would better integrate the treatment of such factual premises into the overall structure of administrative law. Courts frequently encounter questions of statutory interpretation that depend on underlying factual background, context, and implications. When they do so, courts generally assume that they retain the authority to decide the factual premises and thereby to answer questions of statutory interpretation that depend on factual premises. This is problematic from a functional standpoint, because courts often lack the information or expertise necessary to assess these underlying facts …

Finding And Citing The "Unimportant" Decisions Of The U.S. Courts Of Appeals, Peter W. Martin

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

A Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure that took effect at the end of 2006 overturned past policies in several circuits that banned or severely limited citation of unpublished or nonprecedential opinions. All U.S. Court of Appeals decisions issued after January 1, 2007, published or not, may be cited. One of the objections raised by those opposed to the rule rested on concern about access to such opinions, which constitute more than 80% of the annual total. The Judicial Conference committee that drafted and pressed for adoption of the rule pointed out that federal legislation called on the circuit courts to …

Motorists Are People Too: Recalculating The Vehicular Search Incident To Arrest Exception By Prohibiting Searches Incident To Arrests For Nonevidentiary Offenses, Rachel Moran

Rachel Moran

The United States Supreme Court must use Arizona v. Gant, for which the Court granted certiorari on February 25, 2008, as an opportunity to clarify the scope of the vehicular search incident to arrest exception by explicitly prohibiting searches which are not justified by the rationales of officer safety or evidence preservation, and which cannot uncover evidence related to the crime of arrest. To the extent that the Court’s 2004 decision in Thornton v. United States allowed a search only (at best) weakly justified by the rationales of officer safety or evidence preservation is problematic, the Supreme Court may simply …

Federal Courts As Constitutional Laboratories: The Rat's Point Of View, Maureen N. Armour

Maureen N Armour

This article examines the operation of the lower federal courts as constitutional laboratories where problems related to implementing the Supreme Court's problematic constitutional decisions are routinely addressed. By using the methodology of a detailed case study of Eighth Amendment litigation the author provides critical insights into the workings of the federal trial courts and three judge appellate panels and insights into the applied phenomenology of ajudicative discretion, the moving force of this judicial laboratory. The article also examines the problematic nature of the Supreme Court's constitutional decisions, their textual openness, doctrinal malleability,and prudential "errors," and how this effects the institutional …

Clearly, Using Intensifiers Is Very Bad--Or Is It?, Lance N. Long, William F. Chistensen

Lance N. Long

Although scholars have generally found that overusing intensifiers (words such as “clearly,” “obviously,” and “very”) negatively affects the persuasiveness or credibility of a legal argument, no one has studied actual appellate briefs to determine whether there is a relationship between intensifier use and the outcome of an appeal. This article describes two empirical studies of appellate briefs, which show that the frequent use of intensifiers in appellate briefs (particularly by an appellant) is usually associated with a statistically significant increase in adverse outcomes for an “offending” party. But--and this was an unexpected result--if an appellate opinion uses a high rate …

Colonialism And The Process Of Defining Aboriginal People, D'Arcy Vermette

Dalhousie Law Journal

It is not uncommon for Aboriginal law students to experience discomfort in studying the law The discomfort is not unique to legal studies, but the law provides a venue where the effects of the imposition of colonial norms are starkly revealed. In law school the author had to confront how Canadian law has attempted to control Aboriginal identity, at first through legislation and then through the courts. While the locus and style of controlling Aboriginal identity has changed over time, the practice of controlling Aboriginal identity is ever present. This process of control dehumanizes individualsand peoples and continues into the …

Evidence-Based Practice To Reduce Recidivism: Implications For State Judiciaries, Roger K. Warren

Roger K Warren

No abstract provided.

Hamdan V. Rumsfeld: A Legislative History Smorgasbord, John J. Miller

John J. Miller II

The Supreme Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld denied the government’s motion to dismiss the habeas appeal of Hamdan, bin Laden’s driver, who was being held at Guantanamo Bay. The majority, led by Justice Stevens, determined that the recently passed Detainee Treatment Act (DTA), which eliminated federal court jurisdiction to hear habeas appeals from detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, did not apply to pending cases, like Hamdan’s. This interpretation was supposedly strongly buttressed by the legislative history of the DTA. This essay outlines the arguments of the opponents and proponents of the use of legislative history, and then juxtaposes these arguments …

The Unrealized Promise Of Section 1983 Method-Of-Execution Challenges, Liam J. Montgomery

Liam J Montgomery

Prior to Hill v. McDonough, federal courts largely viewed method-of-execution challenges as being cognizable only through a petition for habeas corpus. Because federal habeas doctrine involves significant restrictions, such challenges were often difficult, if not impossible, to bring. This was particularly true, for instance, where an inmate had already litigated his first habeas petition and attempted to bring a later habeas corpus execution-protocol challenge: the rules against successive petitions nearly always prevented it, regardless of any newly-revealed factual or legal predicates for the challenge.

But Hill (and a predecessor case, Nelson v. Campbell) changed this framework: inmates could now challenge …

Res Judicata In The Icj’S Genocide Case: Implications For Other Courts And Tribunals?, Peter S. Prows, Michael Ottolenghi

Peter S Prows

The International Court of Justice’s (“ICJ”) 2007 Judgment in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide case (“Genocide case”) has, perhaps predictably, already attracted significant attention from the academic community. Much of this attention has focused on the merits of the judgment, but one commentator has suggested that the Genocide case will be remembered mostly “for the wider impact it will have on issues of res judicata and evidence.” While the important evidentiary issues in the Genocide case have started to generate their own commentary, the issue of res judicata has received …

Life And Death Decisions: Prosecutorial Discretion And Capital Punishment In Missouri, Katherine Barnes, David Sloss, Stephen Thaman

Katherine Barnes kbarnes@.wulaw.wustl.edu

This article presents the results of an empirical study of intentional homicide cases in Missouri. The authors created a database of 1046 cases; it includes substantially all of the homicide cases prosecuted in Missouri over a five year period that were initially charged as murder or voluntary manslaughter and that yielded criminal convictions. The authors selected 247 cases from the larger database for more detailed analysis. We analyzed geographic and racial disparities in the rates at which: prosecutors charge first-degree murder versus lesser charges; prosecutors seek the death penalty, not lesser punishments; defendants are convicted of first-degree murder versus lesser …

Online Access To Court Records - From Documents To Data, Particulars To Patterns, Peter W. Martin

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

For over a decade the public has had remote access to federal court records held in electronic format, including documents filed by litigants and judicial rulings. First available via dial-up connections, access migrated to the Web in 1998. That and a succession of other improvements to the federal "Public Access to Court Electronic Records" system or PACER prompted the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to proclaim in 2001 that "the advancement of technology has brought the citizen ever closer to the courthouse." Unquestionably, what the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and Judicial Conference of the United States …

Wedging Open The Courthouse Doors: Federal Employee Access To Judicial Review Of Constitutional And Statutory Claims, Barbara A. Atkin, Elaine Kaplan, Gregory O'Duden

Barbara A. Atkin

This article addresses, in a comprehensive fashion, jurisdictional barriers that federal employees face in obtaining judicial review of statutory and constitutional claims. Many statutory claims that employees had previously brought in federal court are now precluded entirely by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Courts, however, retain jurisdiction where there are independent jurisdictional bases for review. They also traditionally have preserved their jurisdiction to grant equitable relief for constitutional violations. Determination of those types of government action for which Congress intended the CSRA remedies to be exclusive has been hotly litigated. In addition, even when the claims are not …

Comparing Judicial Compensation: Apples, Oranges, And Cherry-Picking, Matthew W. Wolfe, Reed Watson

Matthew W. Wolfe

United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts describes the American judiciary as the envy of other constitutional democracies. But in one respect, the judiciary apparently trails others: judicial pay. Citing higher salaries of judges in other countries, Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito have all argued that inadequate judicial pay leads to a decline in judicial performance and quality. Judicial pay advocates apparently make these comparisons to emphasize that low judicial salaries “threaten” judicial quality and independence or, alternatively, that high judicial salaries “ensure” quality and independence. But the argument is incomplete, relying upon …

Sometimes You Have To Go Backwards To Go Forwards: Judicial Review And The New National Security Exception To The Fourth Amendment, Sheerin N. Shahinpoor

Sheerin N. Shahinpoor

National security concerns have historically provided a strong basis for non-justiciable Executive Branch action; however, post 9/11, such actions have grown to encompass a greater number of American citizens' civil liberties. The federal judiciary's deferential treatment of national-security related conduct, particularly in the realm of suspicionless searches, occurs with dangerous frequency, and any semblance of meaningful review has been nearly eviscerated. The stakes involved in national security are weighty and, in many instances, present the courts with an artificial choice: uphold a potentially over-zealous suspicionless-search program but avoid danger, or strike down such a program in favor of civil liberties …

Oy Vey! The Bernstein Exception: Rethinking The Doctrine In The Wake Of Constitutional Abuses, Corporate Malfeasance And The “War On Terror”, Breana Frankel

Breana Frankel

Abstract OY VEY! THE BERNSTEIN EXCEPTION: RETHINKING THE DOCTRINE IN THE WAKE OF CONSTITUTIONAL ABUSES, CORPORATE MALFEASANCE AND THE “WAR ON TERROR” Breana Frankel, Assistant Professor, Chapman University School of Law The “Bernstein doctrine” is a classic example of the exception swallowing the rule. The Bernstein exception allows the Executive to intercede in act of state cases when it determines that adjudication would not harm U.S.-foreign relations. The Exception was initially intended solely to permit victims of Nazi war crimes to recover in United States courts. However, in the more than 50 years since its inception, the Bernstein doctrine has …

Focus On Batson: Let The Cameras Roll, Mimi Samuel

Mimi Samuel

While the Supreme Court outlawed discrimination in jury selection over 40 years ago, both empirical studies and candid interviews show that lawyers routinely rely on characteristics such as race, gender, and religion in striking prospective jurors. In large part, this practice continues because, when challenged, attorneys proffer non-verbal factors such as facial expressions, inattentiveness, eye contact (or lack thereof), or even laughing or coughing to justify their peremptory strikes. Without a way to assess the validity of these reasons, the trial judge and then the appellate court on review, have little ability to enforce the anti-discrimination prohibition set forth in …

Mis-Under-Standing Freedom From Religion: Two Cents On Madison's Three Pence, Kyle Duncan

Kyle Duncan

Forty years ago in Flast v. Cohen, the Supreme Court created, for Establishment Clause cases only, a dramatic exception to a bedrock principle of standing doctrine, based on one catchy phrase from a famous historical document—James Madison’s 1785 Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments. The Court has been notoriously bad at Establishment Clause history, but Flast seemed to push the envelope. Yet neither the Court nor commentators seemed to question Flast’s historical credentials over the last four decades. Recently, the Supreme Court took up the standing question again in Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. Unhappily, the justices’ various …

Even Better Than The Real Thing: How Courts Have Been Anything But Liberal In Finding Genuine Questions Raised As To The Authenticity Of Originals Under Rule 1003, Colin Miller

Colin Miller

In the common law days, parties seeking to prove the contents of documents were required to produce the original documents or account for their nonproduction. Pursuant to the Best Evidence Rule, if such parties neither produced the originals nor accounted for their nonproduction, courts prevented them from proving their contents through secondary evidence such as handwritten copies or testimony. With the invention of new technologies such as the process of xerography, however, states in the twentieth century began enacting exceptions to the Best Evidence Rule which allowed for the admission of duplicates created without manual transcription even when proponents could …

Litigation Discovery Cannot Be Optimal But Could Be Better: The Economics Of Improving Discovery Timing In A Digital Age, Scott A. Moss

Scott A Moss

Cases are won and lost in discovery, yet discovery draws surprisingly little academic attention. Most scholarship focuses on how much discovery to allow, not how courts decide discovery disputes – which, unlike trials, occur in most cases. Today, much evidence is “e-discovery” – imprudent emails or still-lingering “deleted” files – making costly discovery battles increasingly salient. But the e-discovery rules are not truly new, just a strengthening of old cost/benefit “proportionality” limits on discovery enacted when the spread of photocopiers similarly increased the amount of discovery. Proportionality limits are topic of broad consensus among civil procedure scholars as well as …

Federalism, The Rehnquist Court, And The Modern Republican Party, Bradley W. Joondeph

Bradley W. Joondeph

Most scholars agree that federalism was central to the Rehnquist Court’s constitutional agenda. But there is a part of the federalism story that has been largely overlooked: the Court's decisions involving the structural constraints on state governments, the most significant of which are preemption and the dormant Commerce Clause. This article makes two empirical claims about the Rehnquist Court’s federalism jurisprudence, one descriptive and one interpretive. The descriptive claim is that that the Court’s overall approach to federalism was more complicated than many have assumed, and it was not necessarily friendly to the states. To support this contention, I present …

Let’S Count Them All: Maryland Courts Should Adopt An Interventionist Approach To Contested Elections, John C. Armstrong

John C Armstrong

Maryland courts currently take a hands-off approach to challenges to contested elections. In this article, I argue that the Maryland Court of Appeals should overrule some of its precedent and adopt a more active role in judicial challenges to contested elections. In Part I, I discuss the current statutory provisions and case law covering contest elections in Maryland. In Part II, I propose a new test for court challenges to contested elections. In Part III, I briefly summarize federal case law and case law from other states that have adopted an approach similar to the test I advocate. In Part …

Book Review: Justice In Robes By Ronald Dworkin (2006), Dan Priel

All Papers

Since the 1960's Ronald Dworkin has been arguing for a particular account of law that he believed was both explanatorily superior to the one offered by competing theories, and also the basis for normative arguments for producing right answers to legal questions. Justice in Robes collects Dworkin's most recent essays on this subject and thus provides the appropriate opportunity for assessing the legal theory of one of the more influential legal philosophers. In this Review I seek to offer a clearer account than appears in the book itself of Dworkin's project, and in this way offer a measured assessment of …

The Boundaries Of Contact Law In Cyberspace, Leon E. Trakman

Leon E Trakman Dean

Cyberspace has introduced novel ways in which to conclude, perform and terminate agreements. It has also raised doubts about whether traditional principles of contract law can adequately regulate new categories of contracts like click-wrap and browse-wrap agreements that were unheard of a few decades ago. This article explores these exciting new developments. Starting with an examination of late Nineteenth and early Twentieth adhesion contracts and the law of unconscionability, it evaluates innovations in contracting that have evolved since then. Uncovering the complexities associated with “wrap” contracts and End User Licensing Agreements [EULAs], it scrutinizes how legislatures and courts have responded …

An Aesthetic Defense Of The Non-Precedential Opinion: The Easy Cases Debate In The Wake Of The 2007 Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Appellate Procedure, Caleb E. Mason

Caleb E. Mason

Abstract: In this article I extol the virtues of the short, nonprecedential opinions (NPOs) that make up more than 80% of the output of the courts of appeals. The recent amendment to Fed. R. App. Proc. 32.1(a), requiring that all circuits allow citation to nonprecedential opinions, has provoked considerable debate about how, and whether, to issue opinions in the class of cases currently resolved by NPOs. I defend the issuance of NPOs not as a necessary concession to overwork, but rather as a valuable decisional form that plays a useful if not vital role in inculcating in practitioners the perceptual …

Presidential Authority And The War On Terror, Joseph W. Dellapenna

Working Paper Series

Immediately after the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush claimed, among other powers, the power to launch preemptive wars on his own authority; the power to disregard the laws of war pertaining to occupied lands; the power to define the status and treatment of persons detained as “enemy combatants” in the war on terror; and the power to authorize the National Security Agency to undertake electronic surveillance in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. With the exception of the power to launch a preemptive war on his own authority (for which he …

Green-Lighting Brown: A Cumulative-Process Conception Of Judicial Impact, Vincent James Strickler

Vincent James Strickler

Disagreement over the meaning and power of Brown v. Board of Education is part of a larger debate about the capacity of the courts to influence social change. A “down with Brown” movement denies that the iconic case changed America. But, an examination of 68 United States Supreme Court cases (particularly the paradigm-shifting case of Green v. County School Board) and 414 Federal District Court cases, from 1944 through 1974, reveals a cumulative-judicial process that correlates well (and better than legislative efforts) with actual desegregation successes. Considering a “Green-lighted” Brown, rather than the historic case in isolation, better reveals the …

Do Cognitive Biases Affect Adjudication?: A Study Of Labor Arbitrators (With Monica Biernat), Martin H. Malin, Monica Biernat

All Faculty Scholarship

Labor arbitrators were presented with four cases to decide, each involving a challenge to discipline or discharge of an employee resulting from a work-family conflict. Arbitrators were randomly given versions of the cases in which the gender and one other characteristivc of the employee were varied. The results showed little evidence of direct gender bias in decision-making but did reflect bias against single parents and employees with eldercare, as opposed to childcare, responsibilities. Implications for other adjudicators, including judges, jurors and administrative agency officials are discussed.

Bosnia V. Serbia: Lessons From The Encounter Of The International Court Of Justice With The International Criminal Tribunal For The Former Yugoslavia, Rebecca Hamilton, Richard J. Goldstone

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

This article uses the recent judgment of the ICJ in Bosnia v. Serbia to highlight the potential problems that arise when international courts have to adjudicate on overlapping situations. It describes the dispute between the ICJ and the ICTY on the appropriate legal standard for the attribution of state responsibility, and finds that the ICJ’s approach in this case suggests that those keen to minimize the fragmentation of international law between adjudicative bodies should not overlook the need for consistency within those bodies.With regard to fact finding, this article raises serious concerns about the manner in which the ICJ relied …

Pfo Law Reform, A Crucial First Step Towards Sentencing Sanity In Kentucky, Robert G. Lawson

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The purpose of this article is to engage in some analysis and discussion of the part of this sentencing law that cries out loudest for reform (the state's persistent felony offender law), reform that in short order would begin to deflate the population that has our prisons and jails grossly overcrowded. In this analysis and discussion, there is some brief consideration of the justifications used to support repeat offender laws (Part I), a segment on the history and evolution of Kentucky's law (Part II), an examination of a selection of repeat offender laws from other states (Part III), a report …