Law Commons^™

Documenting Gender, Dean Spade

UC Law Journal

This Article provides an analysis of gender reclassification policies- policies which determine when an administrative agency will change an individual's gender marker on its records-in three contexts: policies related to gender markers on identification documents, policies related to placement in sex-segregated facilities, and policies related to the state provision of health care that is prohibited based on the gender on record for the person seeking coverage. The Article looks at the significant variation in these policies across agencies to demonstrate the instability of gender as a category of identity verification and to ask whether the assumed usefulness of gender tracking …

Anecdotal Forensics, Phrenology, And Other Abject Lessons From The History Of Science, David L. Faigman

UC Law Journal

Many of the forensic identification sciences-including, among others, latent fingerprints, firearms, handwriting, and bitemarks- have little or no scientific foundation underlying them. They are largely based on anecdotal experience and supposition. In this way, "anecdotal forensics" closely resemble other historical failures of science, such as phrenology. Like phrenology, anecdotal forensics are based on inductive experience, have not been subjected to systematic tests, conform to expectations, "prove" what is already presumed to be known, and seem to have great practical utility for society. A century from now, however, the anecdotally-based beliefs of forensic experts are likely to survive much as phrenology …

"Good" Science Gone Bad: How The Criminal Justice System Can Redress The Impact Of Flawed Forensics, Jessica D. Gable, Margaret D. Wilkinson

UC Law Journal

What can the criminal justice system do when "good" science goes bad? This article provides an answer to that question in three parts. First, this article looks at the inability of certain fields of forensic science to produce reliable results. Second, it discusses problems with the current methods of challenging convictions based on unreliable science. Finally, it proposes a new framework to better enable prisoners to seek review of such convictions. What this article does not do is propose ways to prevent wrongful convictions in the future. We recognize that many issues, including the standards governing the admissibility of forensic …

Inferences, Arguments, And Second Generation Forensic Evidence, Erin Murphy

UC Law Journal

Advances in scientific and technological evidence have resulted in a new, "second generation" of forensic proof characterized by its high degree of probativeness and mechanical sophistication. Methods such as DNA typing are already in widespread use in the criminal justice system, and law enforcement may soon have available other biometric techniques, global locators, or even reliable lie detection systems.

The promise and allure of such forms of forensic evidence lie in its high degree of accuracy. But the perception that such evidence is infallible has resulted in an increasing number of instances in which the government has sought to bolster …

Fingerprint Error Rates And Proficiency Tests: What They Are And Why They Matter, Jonathan J. Koehler

UC Law Journal

The reliability and probative value of a reported fingerprint match at trial is inextricably linked to the rate at which fingerprint examiners make errors. Therefore, it is important that jurors and other legal actors have valid information about the different types of errors, error rates, and scientific tests that can assist with error rate estimates. There is much confusion surrounding these issues and this paper addresses each using a question- and-answer style. Specifically, I describe the different types of errors (e.g., false positives, false negatives, and false alarms) and error rates, explain why they matter, and discuss how we might …

The Myth Of "Lucky" Patent Verdicts: Improving The Quality Of Appellate Review By Incorporating Fuzzy Logic In Jury Verdicts, Michael T. Nguyen

UC Law Journal

Fuzzy logic, a relatively new mathematical concept, has emerged over the past few decades as an effective tool to model complexity and uncertainty. In a nutshell, fuzzy logic recognizes that truth is not always black or white, but rather, truth can be measured in shades of gray. Patents, because they rely on language to claim inventions, are fuzzy legal concepts. Fuzzy logic may help to simplify the jurors' comprehension of complex real-world problems in patent law.

In this Note, I propose a "fuzzy" special verdict form and procedure for "defuzzifying" the verdict that would allow the jury the freedom to …

Ten Lessons For Practitioners About Family Responsibilities Discrimination And Stereotyping Evidence, Catherine Albiston, Kathryn Burkett Dickson, Charlotte Fishman, Leslie F. Levy

UC Law Journal

This Article highlights ten key lessons that employment law practitioners can take away from the scholarship collected in this symposium Issue. The legal field of Family Responsibilities Discrimination (FRD) has developed rapidly in the past two decades, with FRD litigation only likely to increase. Social science research on the maternal wall continues to develop, increasing our understanding of what discrimination looks like in the workplace today. The FRD case law and social science research highlighted in this Issue provide essential information that employment law attorneys can put into practice when faced with addressing FRD in the workplace.

The Matter Of Fit: The Law Of Discrimination And The Science Of Implicit Bias, David L. Faigman, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Cecilia L. Ridgeway

UC Law Journal

This Article examines the "fit" between the law of discrimination and the science of implicit bias, including consideration of the legal standards that apply and a broad overview of the sociological and psychological literatures that are relevant to those standards. The Authors first set forth the legal framework within which the psychological and sociological research literatures must be considered. Although the legal standard is not entirely unambiguous, scientific research on implicit bias appears relevant to the basic empirical issues put in issue by the law. The Authors then review the general research literature on the phenomenon of "implicit biases" in …

Discrimination-Reducing Measures At The Relational Level, Tristin K. Green, Alexandra Kalev

UC Law Journal

Social scientists have shown that bias and stereotypes are executed and reinforced not only in moments of decision making, like hiring or promotion, but also in day-to-day interactions and social relations (or lack thereof) at work. The Authors discuss existing measures for reducing employment discrimination as focusing too narrowly at the individual level of discrimination. They argue that discrimination-reducing measures taken by employers should be expanded to address the relational sources of discrimination. The Authors review research showing that employers can reduce relational sources of discrimination and workplace inequality by changing the context of workplace relations and interactions from stereotype …

Armed Standoffs And The Warrant Requirement, Edward H. Arens

UC Law Journal

The Fourth Amendment, as decided by the Supreme Court in Payton v. New York, forbids police from arresting suspects in their homes without a warrant or a compelling excuse. Applying this principle to standoffs between police and suspects who have barricaded themselves inside their homes, however, presents significant interpretive problems. The foremost difficulty is that it is not clear when the Fourth Amendment even applies to police standoffs. Courts disagree on whether police seize barricaded suspects simply by surrounding a house, or whether the suspect remains free until he or she surrenders or is physically subdued. Second, Payton excuses a …

Lead Paint: Who Will Bear The Cost Of Abating The Latest Public Nuisance, Greg J. Carlson

UC Law Journal

In the past, mass tort litigation has arisen in the contexts of asbestos, tobacco, environmental contamination and handgun manufacturing. While the theory of public nuisance has found its way into court discussion in most of these contexts, recent lead paint litigation has opened a new chapter to the uncertainties that accompany the use of public nuisance in mass tort litigation. Specifically, a question of liability arises. While lead paint manufacturers may be ordered to follow a particular set of measures to eliminate the paint and its hazards, the answer to one critical question still remains uncertain: Who will ultimately bear …

The Cleaver, The Violin, And The Scalpel: Duty And The Restatement (Third) Of Torts, Aaron D. Twerski

UC Law Journal

This Article takes issue with the approach taken by the proposed final draft of the Restatement (Third) of Torts that insists that noduty or limited duty rules should be formulated only when a court can promulgate clear, categorical, bright-line rules that are applicable to a general class of cases. In this Article I demonstrate that no-duty rules may often have to be formulated and tailored to the facts of a specific case. I respond to the critics who are concerned that no-duty rules that are fact specific allow courts to invade the province of juries whose task it is to …

Measuring The Tax Subsidy In Private Equity And Hedge Fund Compensation, Thomas J. Brennan, Karl S. Okamoto

UC Law Journal

This Article offers a new analysis of the debate over the taxation of private equity and hedge fund managers. We provide an analytical model that allows us to compare the relative risk-reward benefit enjoyed by these fund managers and other managers. We look to "relative benefits" in order to determine the extent to which the current state of the world favors the services of a fund manager over these other workers. Our conclusion is that private equity and hedge fund managers do outperform other workers on a risk-adjusted, after-tax basis. We assume that over time compensation of private equity and …

Distributive Injustice And Private Law, Aditi Bagchi

UC Law Journal

Private law recognizes claims between individuals. Legal economists have argued that claims by the socially disadvantaged against the better off are best dealt with outside private law, primarily through tax and transfer. Most theorists of private law similarly oppose considerations of distributive justice in contract and tort because they have assumed that this would confer a windfall upon poor plaintiffs, and penalize wealthy defendants beyond their fair share. Private law theorists resist this moral arbitrariness; individual legal liability is supposed to reflect individual responsibility, and matters of distributive justice are a collective responsibility.

In this Article, I argue that even …

Brown V. United States, The Paquete Habana, And The Executive, Michelle Akerman

UC Law Journal

During the course of the War on Terrorism, members of the executive have drawn upon a variety of sources, including nineteenth and twentieth century wartime cases, to support expansive executive authority, including the authority to violate customary international law. This Note examines one of the nineteenth century wartime cases relied upon by the executive, Brown v. United States, and argues that the executive's reliance on this particular case is misplaced. Not only does Brown date back to an era when the Executive enjoyed far less power in international and military matters, contemporary members of the executive have relied upon a …

Continuing Abuse Of The Hatch-Waxman Act By Pharmaceutical Patent Holders And The Failure Of The 2003 Amendments, Mathew Avery

UC Law Journal

The Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984 established a system whereby generic manufacturers can seek to market generic equivalents of a pioneer's patented drug prior to the patent's expiry. But the original Act also contained provisions that were exploited by patent holders to delay generic competition and thereby extend their monopoly sales. Congress amended the Hatch-Waxman Act to address these abusive practices with the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. This Note analyzes how the 2003 amendments failed to remedy exploitation of the Hatch-Waxman Act by pharmaceutical patent holders who use reverse payments and authorized generics to manipulate the 180-day market exclusivity given …

Are Bankruptcy Judges Unconstitutional? An Appointments Clause Challenge, Tuan Samahon

UC Law Journal

The Appointments Clause permits Congress to opt out of the Article II procedure of presidential nomination and Senate advice and consent by vesting the appointment of "inferior officers" in "the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments." Congress exercised this option when it vested the power to appoint bankruptcy judges in the United States Courts of Appeals, implicitly categorizing these judges as "inferior officers" and thereby exposing a potential Achilles' heel. Although the Courts of Law have appointed bankruptcy adjudicators since the earliest bankruptcy laws, this Article advances the position that bankruptcy judges have …

Creating Children With Disabilities: Parental Tort Liability For Preimplantation Genetic Interventions, Kirsten Rabe Smolensky

UC Law Journal

Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), parents can now screen embryos for genetic traits such as deafness and achondroplasia (dwarfism). Studies show that some parents intentionally choose embryos with disabilities because that genetic trait runs in the family. This recent trend raises the important legal question of whether a child can sue his parents in tort for selecting or engineering disabling genetic traits.

This Article suggests that children both can and should be able to successfully sue parents who engage in certain direct genetic interventions. First, tort law should protect a child's moral right to an open future where parents' preimplantation …

Intentional Diminishment, The Non-Identity Problem, And Legal Liability, I. Glenn Cohen

UC Law Journal

This Article, lying at the intersection of law and bioethics, examines whether it is wrongful to use assisted reproductive technology to intentionally create disabled children, and whether legal liability should attach to such acts. In particular, this Article considers the way these issues are intertwined with what philosophers have called the "Non-Identity Problem," the idea that so long as a resulting child will have a life worth living the child cannot be harmed by being brought into existence, because even an impoverished life is better than not existing at all.

In her article in this Issue, Kirsten Smolensky suggests that …

Insult To Injury: A Disability-Sensitive Response To Smolensky's Call For Parental Tort Liability For Preimplantation Genetic Interventions, Alicia R. Ouellette

UC Law Journal

In her article, Creating Children with Disabilities: Parental Tort Liability for Preimplantation Genetic Interventions, Professor Kirsten Rabe Smolensky argues that children who were subject to preimplantation genetic manipulation should have the ability to sue their parents for damages when the parents "directly intervene in the child's DNA and consequently cause that child to suffer a disability which limits the child's right to an open future." This Essay addresses the implications for people with disabilities of that argument. Specifically, it argues that limiting damages to cases in which a child is born with a disability unnecessarily and inaccurately devalues life with …

Parental Tort Liability For Preimplantation Genetic Interventions: Technological Harms, The Social Model Of Disability, And Questions Of Identity, Kirsten Rabe Smolensky

UC Law Journal

Professors Glenn Cohen, Jaime King, and Alicia Ouellette each wrote a thoughtful commentary in response to the article, Creating Children with Disabilities: Parental Tort Liability for Preimplantation Genetic Interventions. This short Essay is a reply to several broad themes that appear in these commentaries. It both clarifies several points made in the original article and makes a few additional arguments in favor of parental tort liability. In particular, this Essay addresses calls for regulation and provider liability, assesses additional costs and benefits associated with preimplantation genetic interventions, reevaluates the original proposal in a way more sensitive to persons with disabilities, …

Prosecuting Elder Abuse: Setting The Gold Standard In The Golden State, Arthur Meirson

UC Law Journal

This Note proposes amending California's elder abuse law. Currently, California Penal Code sections 368(b) and (c) allow the prosecution of any person who willfully causes or permits a person they know to be an elder or dependent adult "to suffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering." The failing of this law is its focus on the subjective experience of the elder or dependent adult victim. Because the law only allows punishment where the victim suffers or experiences unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering, there are numerous circumstances that allow a perpetrator of abuse to escape prosecution. These …

Introducing The New And Improved Americans With Disabilities Act: Assessing The Ada Amendments Act Of 2008, Alex B. Long

Scholarly Works

This essay summarizes the changes to the Americans with Disabilities made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. The Act represents the first substantive revision to the ADA since its inception and contains some dramatic changes. This essay summarizes those changes and makes some preliminary assessments as to how the new amendments are likely to alter the current interpretation of the ADA.

The Impact Of Enforcement: A Reflection, Howell E. Jackson

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

No abstract provided.

Setting The Bar Too High, Frank I. Michelman

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

No abstract provided.

Judicial Review Of Election Administration, Daniel P. Tokaji

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

No abstract provided.

Light At The End Of The Pipeline?: Choosing A Forum For Suspected Terrorists, Amos N. Guiora, John T. Parry

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

No abstract provided.

Medicare: Did The Devil Make Us Do It?, David A. Hyman, Jill R. Horwitz

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

No abstract provided.

Baze-D And Confused: What's The Deal With Lethal Injection?, Alison J. Nathan, Douglas A. Berman

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

No abstract provided.

Workplace Federalism, Paul M. Secunda, Jeffrey M. Hirsch

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

No abstract provided.