Law Commons^™

Legal Issues: San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta And Estuary, Stuart L. Somach

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

48 pages.

Contains footnotes.

Bay/Delta Standards Memorandum And Exhibits, Thomas J. Graff

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

47 pages.

Federal Groundwater Quality Control: Law And Policy, Robert L. Glicksman

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

56 pages.

Contains references.

Water Rights Implications Of Water Quality Regulation In Colorado, Lawrence J. Macdonnell

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

40 pages.

Effects Of Upstream Transfers On Water Quality Permittees: A Summary Of Practical Problems And Solutions, Lee Kapaloski

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

19 pages.

Contains 3 pages of footnotes.

Effluent: Making Use Of A Valuable Resource In Arizona, Kathleen Ferris

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

40 pages.

Contains references.

A Coasean Experiment On Contract Presumptions, Stewart J. Schwab

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Despite the theoretical importance of the Coase Theorem, scholars have given surprisingly little attention to verifying its predictions empirically. Supporters often accept the theorem as dogma, while armchair critics assail its assumptions. In an exciting series of recent articles, however, Elizabeth Hoffman and Matthew Spitzer have presented experimental evidence, as have others, that largely supports the Coasean prediction that bargainers will negotiate around inefficient property rights to reach a Pareto-optimal solution. The methodology has even gained sufficient attention to have its detractors.

The existing experiments analyze the results of bargains when one side has the power to impose unilaterally one …

Agenda: Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use And Environmental Protection, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Charles F. Wilkinson.

Protecting water quality is essential to preserve the many beneficial uses of western water resources. This conference addresses the dominant federal requirements in the Clean Water Act, including the important major revisions enacted by Congress in 1987, with special attention to western problems regarding nonpoint source pollution. Developments in groundwater quality regulation are considered, as are selected issues concerning the implications of state and federal water quality regulation for the traditional exercise of water rights.

Assessment Of Water Quality Progress And Problems In The West, David H. Getches

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

32 pages.

Contains references.

A Practitioner’S Perspective On Section 404 Permitting—Or—How To Survive The Daze From The Hazy Maze, Marcia M. Hughes

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

17 pages.

Contains footnotes and references.

The Effluent Charge Approach To Water Quality Control, Ralph W. Johnson

Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3)

10 pages.

Contains references.

Mullins V. Simmons: The Early Vesting Rule And The "Death Without Issue: Clause, Lynda L. Butler

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Instream Flow Water Rights: Arizona’S Approach, Herb Dishlip

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

15 pages.

Instream Flows, The Public Trust, And The Future Of The West, Harrison C. Dunning

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

65 pages (includes illustrations).

Contains 28 pages of footnotes.

Uncertainty, Efficiency, And The Brokerage Industry, Michael S. Knoll

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Agenda: Instream Flow Protection In The Western United States: A Practical Symposium, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

Conference speakers included University of Colorado School of Law professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Charles F. Wilkinson.

Virtually all western states now provide some kind of legal recognition for instream flows. On March 31-April 1, the Natural Resources Law Center will present a symposium on the different approaches taken in these states, with emphasis on such major issues as the purposes for instream flows, the quantities of water needed for these purposes, enforcement of instream flow rights, federal instream flow claims, private instream flow claims, and transferring consumptive water rights to instream flow rights. Speakers include representatives from state agencies …

Oregon’S Minimum Perennial Streamflows, John Borden

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

12 pages.

Private Appropriation Of Instream Flows In Alaska, Mary Lu Harle

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

30 pages.

Contains 2 pages of footnotes and 3 pages of references.

Establishing The Quantity Of Necessary Flow, Berton L. Lamb

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

26 pages (includes illustrations).

Contains footnotes and 3 pages of references.

Colorado’S Instream Flow Program: Protecting Free-Flowing Streams In A Water Consumptive State, Steven J. Shupe

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

30 pages.

Contains footnotes.

Instream Flows In Idaho, Josephine P. Beeman, Kenneth R. Arment

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

23 pages.

Contains footnotes.

The Protection Of Instream Flows In Montana: A Legal-Institutional Perspective, Matthew J. Mckinney, Gary Fritz, Patrick Graham, Deborah Schmidt

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

42 pages.

Contains references.

Keeping The Waters Flowing: Streamflow Protection Programs, Strategies And Issues In The West, Steven J. Shupe

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

44 pages.

Contains 2 pages of footnotes.

Wyoming’S New Instream Flow Law, Gordon W. Fassett

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

28 pages.

Contains references.

Protecting Instream Resources In Washington State, Robert F. Barwin, Kenneth Slattery, Steven J. Shupe

Instream Flow Protection in the Western United States: A Practical Symposium (March 31-April 1)

56 pages (includes 1 map).

Contains 10 pages of footnotes.

The Rights Of Creditors Under Article 2a, Steven L. Harris

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Changing Judicial Attitudes Towards Property Rights In California Water Resources: From Vested Rights To Utilitarian Reallocations, Clifford W. Schulz, Gregory S. Weber

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.

An Update On The Legal Chameleon: Florida's Homestead Exemption And Restrictions, Donna Litman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

An Ecological Perspective On Property, David Hunter

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

This article presents an ecological perspective on property law, one in which the definition of property rights is determined by the ecological characteristics of the property. Thus, a wetlands would be treated differently than a parking lot.

Recent Developments In Family Law: Property Division At Dissolution, Mary Kay Kisthardt

Faculty Works

The law pertaining to the division of property at dissolution has undergone substantial change in recent years. This is due primarily to the adoption of principles of equitable distribution. These principles require the courts to define "marital" property and to develop guidelines to determine how and in what proportion such property is to be divided. This Article will survey some of the significant developments in Missouri in this important area of family law.