Law Commons^™

A Law & Macroeconomics Critique Of San Antonio Independent School District V. Rodriguez, Steven A. Ramirez

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Fifty years ago, the Supreme Court decided, in San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, to permit states to provide dramatically disparate funding for childhood education from district to district, thereby concretizing and propagating racial and economic inequality indefinitely. This Article shows that this decision entails staggering macroeconomic costs, undermines human development in the United States, and has hindered the government from promoting general welfare, domestic tranquility, and common defense. The opinion pursued the political objectives of the Southern Strategy and does not rest upon a legitimate exercise of judicial power. Rodriguez furthers the replication of our nation’s racial …

“So” What? Why The Supreme Court’S Narrow Interpretation Of The Computer Fraud And Abuse Act In Van Buren V. United States Has Drastic Effects, Landon Wilneff

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

In Van Buren v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that one does not “exceed authorized access” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) when one accesses information they were otherwise entitled to access. Part I will outline the legislative history of the CFAA, and will explain the circuit split between the Second, Fourth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits and the First, Third, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits. Part II will detail the facts and procedural history of Van Buren, and will walk through the reasoning of the majority and dissent. Part III will analyze the majority’s …

Table Of Contents, Luc Law Journal

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Stimulus Checks, Universal Basic Income, And Debtor Protections, Sophie B. Laing

Loyola Consumer Law Review

Interest in Universal Basic Income (UBI) is growing. While Congress may not be passing UBI legislation anytime soon, the policy has enjoyed enthusiastic support from a variety of high-profile politicians and advocates and made its way from a fringe idea to a national debate. Universal Basic Income has inspired pilot programs across the country, beginning with one such program in 2019 and growing to at least thirty-three by 2021. UBI has been discussed, debated, and dissected in the literature, which has addressed arguments for and against UBI, the values and principles underlying the program, and the policy mechanisms needed to …

Student Loans And Financial Distress: A Qualitative Analysis Of The Most Common Student Loan Complaints, Matthew Adam Bruckner, Christopher J. Ryan, Jr.

Loyola Consumer Law Review

Student loan servicers are the face of the U.S. student loan system, and they are not well-liked. Using the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (the CFPB) consumer complaint database, we study borrower perceptions of the student loan system. We qualitatively analyzed a sample of complaint narratives drawn from every student loan complaint ever filed with the CFPB. Our analysis of these complaint narratives reveals clear patterns of discontent in four primary areas: 1) a mismatch between ability to repay and repayment options, including problems with forbearance, deferments, the public service loan forgiveness program, income-driven repayment plans, and loan cancellation options; 2) …

The Megamerger Of Kroger-Albertsons: A Big Deal For Chicago Consumers, Brett Wainscott

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Loyola Consumer Law Review

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Healthwashing: Corporate Communication Strategies In A Legal Gray Zone, Felix Delerm, Anna Galmiche, Melanie Levy

Loyola Consumer Law Review

In an age of rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases, transnational companies of the tobacco, alcohol, and food industries wash their risk-creating commercial activities and unhealthy products and incidentally mislead consumers. This paper examines industries' quest for legitimacy through elaborate communication strategies. It conceptualizes the practice of healthwashing as a new form of a commercial determinant of health, revealing the inherent tension between commercial and public health objectives. Healthwashing consists of deceptive, multi-level communication strategies, including labeling and advertising, that trick consumers into believing they support companies whose practices align with their values. The paper is the first to present an …

Federal Courts On Mifepristone: How Do Healthcare Consumers Fare?, Jessica Antoni

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Arbitration As Seventh Amendment Waiver: A New Angle For Consumer Advocates?, Steven Becker

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Federal Trade Commission's Green Guides: Failing The American Consumer And The Planet, Thomas Farbacher

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dark Patterns In Law And Economics Framework, Katri Nousiainen, Catalina Perdomo Ortega

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dope At The Door: The Legalization Of Cannabis Delivery And Why Illinois Should Too, Ian Lindsay

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

What The Judge Ate For Breakfast: Reasonable Consumer Challenges In Misleading Food Labeling Claims, Jessica Guarino, Nabilah Nathani, A. Bryan Endres

Loyola Consumer Law Review

Food, being an established aspect of global human culture and history, occupies a unique role in contemporary society. Given the massive market available for packaged and processed food, companies have taken deceptive marketing to new heights, resulting in a flurry of consumer litigation. The dominant test for -evaluating the scope of these cases is the reasonable consumer standard, an amorphous assessment which requires a probability that a majority of the general public or targeted consumers would be misled by said deceptive marketing. By analyzing state and federal consumer protection statutes, landmark cases, and elements of human and cultural psychology, the …

Table Of Contents, Loyola Consumer Law Review

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

I Think I'Ve Seen This Film Before: How Taylor Swift's Eras Tour Has Exposed The Need To Investigate Ticketmaster's Market Dominance, Grace Connelly

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Death By Fashion: Consumers Face Health Risks By Purchasing From Unregulated Fast Fashion Brands, Elizabeth Durosko

Loyola Consumer Law Review

With the rise of globalization and, as an effect, outsourcing, fast fashion has grown in popularity and accessibility. While this trend provides consumers with greater accessibility to affordable fashion trends, it also comes with significant costs.

In the past few years, studies have revealed that clothing produced via various fast fashion brands contain elevated levels of toxic chemicals. While legislatures have tried to regulate these issues, the existing laws fall short of protecting consumers from these harmful chemicals.

To address this issue and better regulate the industry, the United States needs a widespread solution. U.S. legislatures must look to other …

Expanding Access For The Credit Invisible With Just Four Easy Payments? The Unregulated Rise Of Buy Now, Pay Later, Colleen E. Mandell, Morgan J. Lawrence

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Loyola Consumer Law Review

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction To Issue Three, Paul W. Kucinski

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Is Church Autonomy Jurisdictional?, Lael Weinberger

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

The First Amendment’s religion clauses create what courts have called “church autonomy doctrine,” protecting the internal self-governance of religious institutions. But courts are divided as to whether this doctrine is simply an affirmative defense for religious institutions or a jurisdictional limitation on courts’ ability to adjudicate internal religious matters. Scholars, meanwhile, have long debated whether church autonomy is jurisdictional at a higher level of abstraction, speaking of jurisdiction as a concept of authority rather than a technical term for civil procedure. This Article engages this multilevel debate with an argument for unbundling. First, it urges unbundling conceptual jurisdiction from judicial …

From Conciliation To Conflict: How Dobbs V. Jackson Women's Health Organization Reshapes The Supreme Court's Role In American Polarized Society, Shai Stern

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Professor Shai Stern of Bar Ilan University in Israel analyzes the Court’s decision and argues that its approach not only denies a previously recognized constitutional right, but also opens the door for the challenge to other recognized rights. In addition, Professor Stern highlights the Court’s own delegitimization and contribution to rising political polarization.

Blank Space: The Legal Gray Area Created By Police Abuse Of Copyright Law, Connor Druhan

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Music, a universal language sung and heard around the world, is a powerful force for bringing people together. It is also afforded a great deal of protection under United States copyright law. As the way we listen to music has evolved throughout history, so too have the ways that laws protect the rights of musicians and entertainers. However, due to the changing technological landscape and our methods for protecting music, law enforcement officials have found a loophole at the intersection of copyright law, free speech, and the tools we use to enforce the rights of copyright holders. The Digital Millennium …

A Call For Better Abortion Data: Common Ground Amid Dobbs And The Abortion Debate, J. Jackson Hill

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

There is room for compromise in the U.S. abortion debate. Specifically, improving abortion data is an untapped issue with significant bipartisan appeal. Better data will lead to more-informed abortion policy and promote shared public health priorities, like the reduction of unintended pregnancies. Unfortunately, the current abortion reporting system falls short of providing these benefits. There is no national law governing the collection and reporting of abortion data. Americans must therefore rely on information voluntarily provided to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Guttmacher Institute. The result is data that is inaccurate, non-uniform, and untimely. To remedy the …

The New Thoreaus, Mark L. Movsesian

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Fifty years ago, in Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Supreme Court famously indicated that “religion” denotes a communal rather than a purely individual phenomenon. An organized group like the Amish would qualify as religious, the Court wrote, but a solitary seeker like the nineteenth century transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau would not. At the time, the question was mostly peripheral; hardly any Americans claimed to have their own, personal religions that would make it difficult for them to comply with civil law. In the intervening decades, though, American religion has changed. One-fifth of us—roughly sixty-six million people—now claim, like Thoreau, to …

Curriculum Censorship Of Lgbtq+ Identity: Modern Adaptation Of Vintage "Save Our Children" Rhetoric Is Still Just Discrimination, Cathryn M. Oakley

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Underpinning Florida’s 2022 “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law is the same vintage, discriminatory rhetoric that has been invoked to harm LGBTQ+ people for decades: that LGBTQ+ people are deviant and fundamentally sexual, therefore even the most chaste acknowledgement of the existence of LGBTQ+ people is inherently inappropriate for children. LGBTQ+ students, students with LGBTQ+ family members, and LGBTQ+ school employees are protected by the constitution, including the First and Fourteenth amendments as well as federal civil rights law. Whether censorship of LGBTQ+ identities is effectuated directly, as in Florida, or indirectly through opt-outs, the dignitary harm is done. Curriculum …

Families, Schools, And Religious Freedom, Helen M. Alvaré

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

Old and New Testament scriptures persistently point to human beings’ romantic and familial relationships according to Christian norms as means of glimpsing foundational religious beliefs about God’s identity, how God loves human beings, and how human beings are to love Him and one another. Christian families, therefore, are alarmed to witness public schools educating minors using normative materials directly opposing Christian norms, and doing so outside of courses subject to parental opt-ins or opt- outs. The Supreme Court has not weighed in on the precise question of parental rights respecting particular educational content of this type, but lower federal courts …

Introduction, Kathleen Michel Kivarkis

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.