Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medicine and Health Sciences

PDF

Series

2003

Institution
Keyword
Publication

Articles 61 - 63 of 63

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Medicaid Involuntary Commitment Project, Annette Christy, Paul G. Stiles, Sonal Pathak Jan 2003

The Medicaid Involuntary Commitment Project, Annette Christy, Paul G. Stiles, Sonal Pathak

Mental Health Law & Policy Faculty Publications

The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) has contracted with the Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute (FMHI) to a study short term involuntary or "Baker Act" examinations for Medicaid enrollees and their service utilizations of services reimbursed by Medicaid. This report presents the questions and methodological approaches that were used in this examination Baker Act and Medicaid data for these individuals.


Federalism And The Future Of Health Care Reform, Richard Briffault, Sherry Glied Jan 2003

Federalism And The Future Of Health Care Reform, Richard Briffault, Sherry Glied

Faculty Scholarship

An important theme in the ongoing health care reform debate is federalism. During the battle over the Clinton Health Plan in 1993–94, the question of which level of government — federal or state — should take the leading role in health policy was almost as contentious as the particular proposals for extending access to quality health care and controlling health care costs. With the failure in 1994 to achieve comprehensive legislation at the national level, many policymakers and commentators gave fresh attention to the states as potential agents for health care reform.


The Politics Of Public Health: A Response To Epstein, Lawrence O. Gostin, Maxwell Gregg Bloche Jan 2003

The Politics Of Public Health: A Response To Epstein, Lawrence O. Gostin, Maxwell Gregg Bloche

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Conservatives are taking aim at the field of public health, targeting its efforts to understand and control environmental and social causes of disease. Richard Epstein and others contend that these efforts in fact undermine people’s health and well-being by eroding people’s incentives to create economic value. Public health, they argue, should stick to its traditional task—the struggle against infectious diseases. Because markets are not up to the task of controlling the transmission of infectious disease, Epstein says, coercive government action is required. But market incentives, not state action, he asserts, represent our best hope for controlling the chronic illnesses that …