Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Procedure

1996

Journal

Institution
Keyword
Publication

Articles 1 - 30 of 46

Full-Text Articles in Law

Goins V. Commonwealth 251 Va. 442, 470 S.E.2d 114 (1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia Sep 1996

Goins V. Commonwealth 251 Va. 442, 470 S.E.2d 114 (1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Loving V. United States 116 S. Ct 1737 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Loving V. United States 116 S. Ct 1737 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Cooper V. Oklahoma 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Cooper V. Oklahoma 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Lonchar V. Thomas 116 S. Ct. 1293 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Lonchar V. Thomas 116 S. Ct. 1293 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Felker V. Turpin 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Felker V. Turpin 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Bennett V. Angelone 92 F.3d 1336 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Sep 1996

Bennett V. Angelone 92 F.3d 1336 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


O'Dell V. Netherland 95 F.3d 1214 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Sep 1996

O'Dell V. Netherland 95 F.3d 1214 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Barnabei V. Commonwealth 1996 Wl 517733 (Va. 1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia Sep 1996

Barnabei V. Commonwealth 1996 Wl 517733 (Va. 1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


The Incredible Shrinking Writ: Habeas Corpus Under The Anti-Terrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act Of 1996, Jeanne-Marie S. Raymond Sep 1996

The Incredible Shrinking Writ: Habeas Corpus Under The Anti-Terrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act Of 1996, Jeanne-Marie S. Raymond

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Alice In Wonderland Interpretations: Rethinking The Use Of Mental Mitigation Experts, Douglas S. Collica Sep 1996

Alice In Wonderland Interpretations: Rethinking The Use Of Mental Mitigation Experts, Douglas S. Collica

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Should "Clean Hands" Protect The Government Against § 2515 Suppression Under Title Iii Of The Omnibus Crime Control And Safe Streets Act Of 1968?, Francis Marion Hamilton, Iii Sep 1996

Should "Clean Hands" Protect The Government Against § 2515 Suppression Under Title Iii Of The Omnibus Crime Control And Safe Streets Act Of 1968?, Francis Marion Hamilton, Iii

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Criminal Discovery And Psychological Defenses In West Virginia: Squeezing A Lemon Or Kicking A Dog, J. Robert Russell Sep 1996

Criminal Discovery And Psychological Defenses In West Virginia: Squeezing A Lemon Or Kicking A Dog, J. Robert Russell

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Counter-Revolution In Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, Carol S. Steiker Aug 1996

Counter-Revolution In Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, Carol S. Steiker

Michigan Law Review

For the purposes of my argument, I adapt Professor Meir Dan-Cohen's distinction (which he in turn borrowed from Jeremy Bentham) between "conduct" rules and "decision" rules. Bentham and Dan-Cohen make this distinction in the context of substantive criminal law; for their purposes, "conduct" rules are addressed to the general public in order to guide its behavior (for example, "Let no person steal") and "decision" rules are addressed to public officials in order to guide their decisionmaking about the consequences of violating conduct rules (for example, "Let the judge cause whoever is convicted of stealing to be hanged"). But as ...


Computers, Urinals, And The Fourth Amendment: Confessions Of A Patron Saint, Wayne R. Lafave Aug 1996

Computers, Urinals, And The Fourth Amendment: Confessions Of A Patron Saint, Wayne R. Lafave

Michigan Law Review

At least the title indicates that the article is somehow concerned with "the Fourth Amendment," though for anyone who knows me or is at all familiar with my work, that piece of information hardly would come as a revelation. The fact of the matter is that I almost always write about the Fourth Amendment; I am in an academic rut so deep as to deserve recognition in the Guinness Book World of Records. Search and seizure has been my cheval de bataille during my entire time as a law professor and even when I was a mere law student. And ...


A Peculiar Privilege In Historical Perspective: The Right To Remain Silent, Albert W. Alschuler Aug 1996

A Peculiar Privilege In Historical Perspective: The Right To Remain Silent, Albert W. Alschuler

Michigan Law Review

Supreme Court decisions have vacillated between two incompatible readings of the Fifth Amendment guarantee that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." The Court sometimes sees this language as affording defendants and suspects a right to remain silent. This interpretation - a view that countless repetitions of the Miranda warnings have impressed upon the public - asserts that government officials have no legitimate claim to testimonial evidence tending to incriminate the person who possesses it. Although officials need not encourage a suspect to remain silent, they must remain at least neutral toward her decision ...


Criminal Protection Orders In Domestic Violence Cases: Getting Rid Of Rats With Snakes, Christopher R. Frank Jul 1996

Criminal Protection Orders In Domestic Violence Cases: Getting Rid Of Rats With Snakes, Christopher R. Frank

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law—Twelve Angry People. Arkansas Constitution Guarantees Right To Trial By Jury Of Twelve Persons In Criminal Cases. Byrd V. State, 317 Ark. 609, 879 S.W.2d 435 (1994)., Timothy N. Holthoff Apr 1996

Constitutional Law—Twelve Angry People. Arkansas Constitution Guarantees Right To Trial By Jury Of Twelve Persons In Criminal Cases. Byrd V. State, 317 Ark. 609, 879 S.W.2d 435 (1994)., Timothy N. Holthoff

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Criminal Procedure—Good Faith, Big Brother, And You: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Good Faith Exception To The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule. Arizona V. Evans, 115 S. Ct. 1185 (1995)., Elisa Masterson White Apr 1996

Criminal Procedure—Good Faith, Big Brother, And You: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Good Faith Exception To The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule. Arizona V. Evans, 115 S. Ct. 1185 (1995)., Elisa Masterson White

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Federalism Pendulum, Ronald J. Bacigal Apr 1996

The Federalism Pendulum, Ronald J. Bacigal

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Defunding Of The Post Conviction Defense Organizations As A Denial Of The Right To Counsel, Roscoe C. Howard Jr. Apr 1996

The Defunding Of The Post Conviction Defense Organizations As A Denial Of The Right To Counsel, Roscoe C. Howard Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fry V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 413, 463 S.E.2d 433 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia Mar 1996

Fry V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 413, 463 S.E.2d 433 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Litigating Jury Issues In Capital Trials: Constitutional Law And Virginia Procedures, Paula Dyan Effle Mar 1996

Litigating Jury Issues In Capital Trials: Constitutional Law And Virginia Procedures, Paula Dyan Effle

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Maximizing Your Potential: The Effective Use Of Co-Counsel In A Capital Case, Courtney S. Townes Mar 1996

Maximizing Your Potential: The Effective Use Of Co-Counsel In A Capital Case, Courtney S. Townes

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Taking The Offensive: Proactive Use Of The Rules Of Evidence, Angela Dale Fields Mar 1996

Taking The Offensive: Proactive Use Of The Rules Of Evidence, Angela Dale Fields

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Challenging The Future Dangerousness Aggravating Factor, Michael H. Spencer Mar 1996

Challenging The Future Dangerousness Aggravating Factor, Michael H. Spencer

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


What To Do When You're Ambushed By Undisclosed Evidence Of Unadjudicated Acts To Show Future Dangerousness, Douglas S. Collica Mar 1996

What To Do When You're Ambushed By Undisclosed Evidence Of Unadjudicated Acts To Show Future Dangerousness, Douglas S. Collica

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Daubert And The Use Of Experts In Virginia Capital Cases, J. Conrad Garcia Mar 1996

Daubert And The Use Of Experts In Virginia Capital Cases, J. Conrad Garcia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Dna Evidence In Virginia, Steven M. Johnson Mar 1996

Dna Evidence In Virginia, Steven M. Johnson

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


University Of Richmond Law Review Jan 1996

University Of Richmond Law Review

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.


Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Cullen D. Seltzer Jan 1996

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Cullen D. Seltzer

University of Richmond Law Review

This article discusses recent Virginia cases and legislative developments in the area of criminal law and procedure. The article discusses cases from April of 1995 to July of 1996 and legislative changes effective July 1, 1996. This article does not discuss federal developments. Nor does the article discuss death penalty issues, as that area of the law is sufficiently particularized that, for purposes of manageability, it falls outside the scope of this discussion.