Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Procedure

1996

Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 1 - 30 of 95

Full-Text Articles in Law

Criminal Procedure: Examples And Expanations, Robert Bloom, Mark Brodin Oct 2013

Criminal Procedure: Examples And Expanations, Robert Bloom, Mark Brodin

Robert Bloom

No abstract provided.


Innocence, Privacy, And Targeting In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Sherry F. Colb Oct 1996

Innocence, Privacy, And Targeting In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Sherry F. Colb

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


From The Desk Of Law Faculty, Delhi University, Maurya Vijay Chandra Sep 1996

From The Desk Of Law Faculty, Delhi University, Maurya Vijay Chandra

Maurya Vijay Chandra

The recent rulinq of the Supreme Court on the bail release of under-trial prisoners is momentous. Its importance lies in the fact, that the judgement confers on an under-trial prisoner booked for certain category of offences a right to be released on bail if he has undergone a certain period of pre-trial detention. Another highlight of the judgement apart from this is that it enjoins upon the trial court to take suo moto cognizance of the pending of trial and under-trial detention. And the order would apply to all future cases. Further, the jUdgement itself provides for its circulation in ...


Goins V. Commonwealth 251 Va. 442, 470 S.E.2d 114 (1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia Sep 1996

Goins V. Commonwealth 251 Va. 442, 470 S.E.2d 114 (1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Loving V. United States 116 S. Ct 1737 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Loving V. United States 116 S. Ct 1737 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Cooper V. Oklahoma 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Cooper V. Oklahoma 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Lonchar V. Thomas 116 S. Ct. 1293 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Lonchar V. Thomas 116 S. Ct. 1293 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Felker V. Turpin 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996) United States Supreme Court Sep 1996

Felker V. Turpin 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Bennett V. Angelone 92 F.3d 1336 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Sep 1996

Bennett V. Angelone 92 F.3d 1336 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


O'Dell V. Netherland 95 F.3d 1214 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Sep 1996

O'Dell V. Netherland 95 F.3d 1214 (4th Cir. 1996) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Barnabei V. Commonwealth 1996 Wl 517733 (Va. 1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia Sep 1996

Barnabei V. Commonwealth 1996 Wl 517733 (Va. 1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


The Incredible Shrinking Writ: Habeas Corpus Under The Anti-Terrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act Of 1996, Jeanne-Marie S. Raymond Sep 1996

The Incredible Shrinking Writ: Habeas Corpus Under The Anti-Terrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act Of 1996, Jeanne-Marie S. Raymond

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Alice In Wonderland Interpretations: Rethinking The Use Of Mental Mitigation Experts, Douglas S. Collica Sep 1996

Alice In Wonderland Interpretations: Rethinking The Use Of Mental Mitigation Experts, Douglas S. Collica

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.


Should "Clean Hands" Protect The Government Against § 2515 Suppression Under Title Iii Of The Omnibus Crime Control And Safe Streets Act Of 1968?, Francis Marion Hamilton, Iii Sep 1996

Should "Clean Hands" Protect The Government Against § 2515 Suppression Under Title Iii Of The Omnibus Crime Control And Safe Streets Act Of 1968?, Francis Marion Hamilton, Iii

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Criminal Discovery And Psychological Defenses In West Virginia: Squeezing A Lemon Or Kicking A Dog, J. Robert Russell Sep 1996

Criminal Discovery And Psychological Defenses In West Virginia: Squeezing A Lemon Or Kicking A Dog, J. Robert Russell

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Tihar Project: Some Early Reflection (August), Maurya Vijay Chandra Aug 1996

Tihar Project: Some Early Reflection (August), Maurya Vijay Chandra

Maurya Vijay Chandra

They sat on the lawns and we started talking to them one by one. All of a sudden I saw everybody around us rising. For a split second I was puzzled ! Then I realized that the famous song "Aai Malik Tere Bande Hum" from "00 Ankhen Barah Hath" was being played on the public address system. "It is their evening prayer!" I realized. And I was impressed ! not by their discipline but by their devotion.


Computers, Urinals, And The Fourth Amendment: Confessions Of A Patron Saint, Wayne R. Lafave Aug 1996

Computers, Urinals, And The Fourth Amendment: Confessions Of A Patron Saint, Wayne R. Lafave

Michigan Law Review

At least the title indicates that the article is somehow concerned with "the Fourth Amendment," though for anyone who knows me or is at all familiar with my work, that piece of information hardly would come as a revelation. The fact of the matter is that I almost always write about the Fourth Amendment; I am in an academic rut so deep as to deserve recognition in the Guinness Book World of Records. Search and seizure has been my cheval de bataille during my entire time as a law professor and even when I was a mere law student. And ...


Counter-Revolution In Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, Carol S. Steiker Aug 1996

Counter-Revolution In Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, Carol S. Steiker

Michigan Law Review

For the purposes of my argument, I adapt Professor Meir Dan-Cohen's distinction (which he in turn borrowed from Jeremy Bentham) between "conduct" rules and "decision" rules. Bentham and Dan-Cohen make this distinction in the context of substantive criminal law; for their purposes, "conduct" rules are addressed to the general public in order to guide its behavior (for example, "Let no person steal") and "decision" rules are addressed to public officials in order to guide their decisionmaking about the consequences of violating conduct rules (for example, "Let the judge cause whoever is convicted of stealing to be hanged"). But as ...


A Peculiar Privilege In Historical Perspective: The Right To Remain Silent, Albert W. Alschuler Aug 1996

A Peculiar Privilege In Historical Perspective: The Right To Remain Silent, Albert W. Alschuler

Michigan Law Review

Supreme Court decisions have vacillated between two incompatible readings of the Fifth Amendment guarantee that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." The Court sometimes sees this language as affording defendants and suspects a right to remain silent. This interpretation - a view that countless repetitions of the Miranda warnings have impressed upon the public - asserts that government officials have no legitimate claim to testimonial evidence tending to incriminate the person who possesses it. Although officials need not encourage a suspect to remain silent, they must remain at least neutral toward her decision ...


Criminal Protection Orders In Domestic Violence Cases: Getting Rid Of Rats With Snakes, Christopher R. Frank Jul 1996

Criminal Protection Orders In Domestic Violence Cases: Getting Rid Of Rats With Snakes, Christopher R. Frank

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


"As The Gentle Rain From Heaven": Mercy In Capital Sentencing, Stephen P. Garvey Jul 1996

"As The Gentle Rain From Heaven": Mercy In Capital Sentencing, Stephen P. Garvey

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Our constitutional law of capital sentencing does not understand Shakespeare's "gentle rain from heaven." Mercy confuses and befuddles it. The jury that sentenced Albert Brown to death was instructed that "'mere ... sympathy"' should not play on its judgment. Brown claimed this instruction violated his Eighth Amendment rights, but the Supreme Court disagreed. Some five years later, Justice Scalia dissented when the Court reversed Derrick Morgan's death sentence. According to Justice Scalia, the Court had held that no "merciless" juror could sit in judgment of a capital defendant. The Constitution, he thought, demanded no such thing. These dissents, one ...


The Color Of Truth: Race And The Assessment Of Credibility, Sheri Lynn Johnson Jul 1996

The Color Of Truth: Race And The Assessment Of Credibility, Sheri Lynn Johnson

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law—Twelve Angry People. Arkansas Constitution Guarantees Right To Trial By Jury Of Twelve Persons In Criminal Cases. Byrd V. State, 317 Ark. 609, 879 S.W.2d 435 (1994)., Timothy N. Holthoff Apr 1996

Constitutional Law—Twelve Angry People. Arkansas Constitution Guarantees Right To Trial By Jury Of Twelve Persons In Criminal Cases. Byrd V. State, 317 Ark. 609, 879 S.W.2d 435 (1994)., Timothy N. Holthoff

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Criminal Procedure—Good Faith, Big Brother, And You: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Good Faith Exception To The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule. Arizona V. Evans, 115 S. Ct. 1185 (1995)., Elisa Masterson White Apr 1996

Criminal Procedure—Good Faith, Big Brother, And You: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Good Faith Exception To The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule. Arizona V. Evans, 115 S. Ct. 1185 (1995)., Elisa Masterson White

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Federalism Pendulum, Ronald J. Bacigal Apr 1996

The Federalism Pendulum, Ronald J. Bacigal

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Resistance To Equality, Elizabeth M. Schneider Apr 1996

Resistance To Equality, Elizabeth M. Schneider

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


To Tell The Truth: The Problem Of Prosecutorial "Manipulation" Of Sentencing Facts, Frank O. Bowman Iii Apr 1996

To Tell The Truth: The Problem Of Prosecutorial "Manipulation" Of Sentencing Facts, Frank O. Bowman Iii

Faculty Publications

Frank O. Bowman, III*In January of this year, Francesca Bowman, Chair of Probation Officers Advisory Group, sent a letter to Judge Richard P. Conaboy, Chairman of the Sentencing Commission, summarizing the results of a survey sent to probation officers in eighty-five districts. It expresses the concern that, in the view of some probation officers, the government usually” is cooperative in supplying information to probation officers preparing presentence investigation reports, but that there appear to be exceptions when the government wants to protect a plea agreement.”


A Bludgeon By Any Other Name: The Misuse Of Ethical Rules Against Prosecutors To Control The Law Of The State, Frank O. Bowman Iii Apr 1996

A Bludgeon By Any Other Name: The Misuse Of Ethical Rules Against Prosecutors To Control The Law Of The State, Frank O. Bowman Iii

Faculty Publications

My objective here is threefold: (1) to explain these ethical rules and demonstrate how each is in conflict with longstanding principles of federal criminal law; (2) to explain why these rules are illegitimate, both as rules of ethics and as rules of positive law; and (3) to offer some observations on how the dispute over these rules can sharpen our thinking about the nature and proper limits of ethical rules governing lawyers.


Jury Responsibility In Capital Sentencing: An Empirical Study, Theodore Eisenberg, Stephen P. Garvey, Martin T. Wells Apr 1996

Jury Responsibility In Capital Sentencing: An Empirical Study, Theodore Eisenberg, Stephen P. Garvey, Martin T. Wells

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

The law allows executioners to deny responsibility for what they have done by making it possible for them to believe they have not done it. The law treats members of capital sentencing juries quite differently. It seeks to ensure that they feel responsible for sentencing a defendant to death. This differential treatment rests on a presumed link between a capital sentencer's willingness to accept responsibility for the sentence she imposes and the accuracy and reliability of that sentence. Using interviews of 153 jurors who sat in South Carolina capital cases, this article examines empirically whether capital sentencing jurors assume ...


The Defunding Of The Post Conviction Defense Organizations As A Denial Of The Right To Counsel, Roscoe C. Howard Jr. Apr 1996

The Defunding Of The Post Conviction Defense Organizations As A Denial Of The Right To Counsel, Roscoe C. Howard Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.