Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (21)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
-
- West Virginia University (3)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (16)
- 1995) (5)
- Constitutions (5)
- Federal (5)
- Criminal procedure (4)
-
- Capital punishment (3)
- Due Process (3)
- New York (3)
- Police (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- (Decided October 31 (2)
- Due Process Clause (2)
- Due process (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Miranda v. Arizona (2)
- New York State (2)
- Rehnquist Court (2)
- Second Department (2)
- (Decided April 24 (1)
- (Decided January 6 (1)
- (decided (1)
- Abuse victims (1)
- African Americans--Legal status, laws, etc.--History (1)
- Allen v. Commonwealth (1)
- Amadeo v. Zant (1)
- Anderson v. Commonwealth (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Appellate Division (1)
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (18)
- Touro Law Review (5)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Maryland Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 52 of 52
Full-Text Articles in Law
Daubert And The Use Of Experts In Virginia Capital Cases, J. Conrad Garcia
Daubert And The Use Of Experts In Virginia Capital Cases, J. Conrad Garcia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Taking The Offensive: Proactive Use Of The Rules Of Evidence, Angela Dale Fields
Taking The Offensive: Proactive Use Of The Rules Of Evidence, Angela Dale Fields
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Challenging The Future Dangerousness Aggravating Factor, Michael H. Spencer
Challenging The Future Dangerousness Aggravating Factor, Michael H. Spencer
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
What To Do When You're Ambushed By Undisclosed Evidence Of Unadjudicated Acts To Show Future Dangerousness, Douglas S. Collica
What To Do When You're Ambushed By Undisclosed Evidence Of Unadjudicated Acts To Show Future Dangerousness, Douglas S. Collica
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
The Battered Woman Syndrome And The Kentucky Criminal Justice System: Abuse Excuse Or Legitimate Mitigation?, Sue E. Mcclure
The Battered Woman Syndrome And The Kentucky Criminal Justice System: Abuse Excuse Or Legitimate Mitigation?, Sue E. Mcclure
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Four Greatest Myths About Summary Judgment, James Joseph Duane
The Four Greatest Myths About Summary Judgment, James Joseph Duane
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Clipper Chip Proposal: Deciphering The Unfounded Fears That Are Wrongfully Derailing Its Implementation, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (1996), Howard S. Dakoff
The Clipper Chip Proposal: Deciphering The Unfounded Fears That Are Wrongfully Derailing Its Implementation, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (1996), Howard S. Dakoff
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Cullen D. Seltzer
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Cullen D. Seltzer
University of Richmond Law Review
This article discusses recent Virginia cases and legislative developments in the area of criminal law and procedure. The article discusses cases from April of 1995 to July of 1996 and legislative changes effective July 1, 1996. This article does not discuss federal developments. Nor does the article discuss death penalty issues, as that area of the law is sufficiently particularized that, for purposes of manageability, it falls outside the scope of this discussion.
New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm
New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Baltimore City's Drug Treatment Court: Theory And Practice In An Emerging Field, William D. Mccoll
Baltimore City's Drug Treatment Court: Theory And Practice In An Emerging Field, William D. Mccoll
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Labyrinths And The Injustice Of Death: A Critique Of Death Penalty Habeas Corpus (Part Two), Alan W. Clarke
Procedural Labyrinths And The Injustice Of Death: A Critique Of Death Penalty Habeas Corpus (Part Two), Alan W. Clarke
University of Richmond Law Review
The following is part two of a two-part article that critiques death penalty habeas corpus. Partone of this article included discussionsof the ineffective assistanceof counsel and the federal habeas corpus exhaustion requirement. 29 U. RICH. L. REV. 1327 (1995). Part two of this article,which follows, discusses issues related to retroactivity in habeas corpus proceedings and procedural default.
Some Thoughts On Bifurcated Sentencing In Non-Capital Felony Cases In Virginia, Thomas D. Horne
Some Thoughts On Bifurcated Sentencing In Non-Capital Felony Cases In Virginia, Thomas D. Horne
University of Richmond Law Review
The punishment stage of a jury trial poses a difficult test for the conflicting attitudes and opinions of individual jurors. In the search for a mature, well-reasoned, and educated verdict, an understanding of the sentencing process by those controlling the flow of information is the best insurance against decisions which spring from passion, prejudice, and personal bias. Given recent legislative changes affecting sentencing in non-capital felony cases, such an understanding is not susceptible to hornbook solutions. This paper will attempt to put those changes in the context of existing sentencing practices and of related evidentiary issues. It is hoped that …
A Remedy Without A Wrong: J.E.B. And The Extension Of Batson To Sex-Based Peremptory Challenges , Brian A. Howie
A Remedy Without A Wrong: J.E.B. And The Extension Of Batson To Sex-Based Peremptory Challenges , Brian A. Howie
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Reform Of Habeas Corpus: The Advocates' Lament, Christopher E. Smith
Judicial Reform Of Habeas Corpus: The Advocates' Lament, Christopher E. Smith
Cleveland State Law Review
The U. S. Supreme Court has engineered significant changes in habeas corpus procedures. Any change in law or public policy has consequences for the human beings whose lives come into contact with the changed law or policy. Critics have accused the Rehnquist Court of "dismantling access to federal habeas corpus review guaranteed by statute since 1867." As a result, concerns have emerged regarding the consequences for potential petitioners whose claims can no longer be reviewed by federal judges. While the fate of death row inmates is the most important consequence of habeas corpus reform, anecdotal reports on these controversial cases …
Appeal And Error: Flores V. State--Navigating The Murky Waters Of Harmless Error Review, Jeannie Pinkston
Appeal And Error: Flores V. State--Navigating The Murky Waters Of Harmless Error Review, Jeannie Pinkston
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.