Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Columbia Law School (17)
- University of Colorado Law School (17)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (16)
- Florida State University College of Law (7)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (7)
-
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (6)
- Barry University School of Law (5)
- Duke Law (5)
- Georgia State University College of Law (5)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (3)
- UIdaho Law (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of New Mexico (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (21)
- Ohio (16)
- Water resource management (12)
- Water resources management (12)
- State law; State administrative decision; (10)
-
- Water law (10)
- Regulation (9)
- Water supply (9)
- California (7)
- Colorado (7)
- Water planning (7)
- Climate change (6)
- State law; State administrative decision (6)
- Watershed management (6)
- Acre-feet (5)
- Colorado River (5)
- Conservation (5)
- Federal agencies (5)
- Rulemaking (5)
- Administrative Procedure Act (4)
- Deference (4)
- Delegation (4)
- Drought (4)
- FDA (4)
- FTC (4)
- Global warming (4)
- Groundwater (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Legal history (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (33)
- Articles (18)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (16)
- Innovations in Managing Western Water: New Approaches for Balancing Environmental, Social and Economic Outcomes (Martz Summer Conference, June 11-12) (13)
- Publications (8)
-
- Scholarly Publications (7)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (6)
- Faculty Publications By Year (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- All Maxine Goodman Levin School of Urban Affairs Publications (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13) (1)
- Department of Political Science and Law Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (1)
Articles 151 - 153 of 153
Full-Text Articles in Law
Charitable Organization Oversight: Rules V. Standards, Philip Hackney
Charitable Organization Oversight: Rules V. Standards, Philip Hackney
Articles
Congress has traditionally utilized standards as a means of communicating charitable tax law in the Code. In the past fifteen years, however, Congress has increasingly turned to rules to stop fraud and abuse in the charitable sector. I review the rules versus standards debate to evaluate this trend. Are Congressional rules the best method for regulating the charitable sector? While the complex changing nature of charitable purpose would suggest standards are better, the inadequacy of IRS enforcement and the large number of unsophisticated charitable organizations both augur strongly in favor of rules. Congress, however, is not the ideal institution to …
Data Breach (Regulatory) Effects, David Thaw
Reasonable Expectations Of Privacy Settings: Social Media And The Stored Communications Act, David Thaw, Christopher Borchert, Fernando Pinguelo
Reasonable Expectations Of Privacy Settings: Social Media And The Stored Communications Act, David Thaw, Christopher Borchert, Fernando Pinguelo
Articles
In 1986, Congress passed the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) to provide additional protections for individuals’ private communications content held in electronic storage by third parties. Acting out of direct concern for the implications of the Third-Party Records Doctrine — a judicially created doctrine that generally eliminates Fourth Amendment protections for information entrusted to third parties — Congress sought to tailor the SCA to electronic communications sent via and stored by third parties. Yet, because Congress crafted the SCA with language specific to the technology of 1986, courts today have struggled to apply the SCA consistently with regard to similar private …