Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Art and Design (1987)
- History (1921)
- Philosophy (1827)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1347)
- Religion (1005)
-
- United States History (751)
- English Language and Literature (684)
- Christianity (640)
- Education (535)
- Liturgy and Worship (518)
- Agricultural and Resource Economics (505)
- Music (404)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (370)
- Cultural History (313)
- European History (272)
- Theatre and Performance Studies (245)
- Digital Humanities (243)
- Social History (224)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (219)
- History of Religion (214)
- Sociology (213)
- Film and Media Studies (210)
- Graphic Design (180)
- Jewish Studies (179)
- Children's and Young Adult Literature (169)
- Modern Languages (166)
- History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology (164)
- American Studies (158)
- Creative Writing (157)
- Institution
-
- University of Windsor (1546)
- Design Research Society (1482)
- The University of Maine (517)
- Calvin University (507)
- Portland State University (350)
-
- Liberty University (286)
- Stephen F. Austin State University (230)
- Western University (192)
- Georgia State University (187)
- Southwestern Oklahoma State University (179)
- Cedarville University (163)
- Fordham University (163)
- Andrews University (125)
- Illinois Wesleyan University (120)
- Johnson & Wales University (117)
- Purdue University (114)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (109)
- Utah State University (101)
- Bowling Green State University (100)
- Kennesaw State University (94)
- Wright State University (93)
- Georgia Southern University (84)
- Pepperdine University (83)
- Colby College (80)
- Brigham Young University (79)
- Texas A&M University-San Antonio (73)
- Technological University Dublin (70)
- University of North Florida (69)
- Kansas State University Libraries (68)
- Arcadia University (61)
- Keyword
-
- Standardbred horses (502)
- Trotting races (502)
- Sulky racing (487)
- American Standardbred racehorses (464)
- Maine harness racing (447)
-
- New England harness racing (428)
- Horse racing (350)
- Worship (224)
- Music (142)
- Maine horse racing (120)
- N/A (99)
- Literary Criticism (75)
- Design education (71)
- Argumentation (64)
- History (62)
- Design (59)
- Cedarville (44)
- Maine State Fair Grounds (41)
- Narragansett Park (40)
- Staley (40)
- Grand Circuit (37)
- New Hampshire harness racing (35)
- Education (33)
- Topsham Fair Trotting Park (33)
- Argument (32)
- Rhetoric (32)
- Service design (32)
- Collaboration (31)
- Critical thinking (31)
- Design thinking (30)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- OSSA Conference Archive (1461)
- Kendall Photo Albums (504)
- Symposium on Worship Archive (499)
- Nordes Conference Series (390)
- DRS Biennial Conference Series (368)
-
- IASDR Conference Series (361)
- Learn X Design Conference Series (288)
- Liberty University Research Week (257)
- Young Historians Conference (252)
- Georgia State Undergraduate Research Conference (186)
- Early Modern Workshop: Resources in Jewish History (163)
- Undergraduate Research Conference (148)
- Student Research Symposium (128)
- The Brown University Alumnus Travel Menu Collection (117)
- The Research and Scholarship Symposium (2013-2019) (110)
- Online Midwinter Seminar (OMS) (90)
- John Wesley Powell Student Research Conference (82)
- BYU English Symposium (79)
- Symposium of Student Scholars (74)
- 11th National Symposium on Spanish as a Heritage Language (73)
- Africana Studies Student Research Conference (71)
- Dublin Gastronomy Symposium (69)
- SFA School of Theatre (66)
- Capstone Showcase (61)
- Phi Alpha Theta Pacific Northwest Regional Conference (57)
- Mythcon (52)
- Pluriversal Design Conference Series (51)
- Colby College Museum of Art (48)
- KUCC -- Kutztown University Composition Conference (48)
- Scholars Week (48)
- File Type
Articles 7891 - 7920 of 9554
Full-Text Articles in Arts and Humanities
Commentary On Freeman, Daniel N. Boone
Commentary On Friemann, H José Plug
Dialectical Obligations Of Serial Arguers, Rich Friemann
Dialectical Obligations Of Serial Arguers, Rich Friemann
OSSA Conference Archive
I examine the concept of the relationship negotiation dialogue (Weger Jr. 2003) in the context of serial arguing (Trapp and Hoff 1985). Between argument episodes, marital partners experiencing difficulty may think about entering counseling, or terminating their relationship. Removed from the dialogical context, such judgments involve the notions of argument as inquiry (Blair 2004; 1992; Johnson 2000) and argument0 (Hample 1992). I explore the dialectical obligations of a person who decides to end his relationship.
Resolving Moral Dissensus: Possibilities For Argumentation, James B. Freeman
Resolving Moral Dissensus: Possibilities For Argumentation, James B. Freeman
OSSA Conference Archive
Moral dissensus may arise first because persons may disagree over the warrants licensing inferring an evaluative conclusion from premises asserting that properties alleged evaluatively relevant hold. This results in seeing different properties as evaluatively relevant. Secondly, such properties will frequently not be descriptive but interpretive, asserting some nomic connection. Persons may disagree over what evaluatively relevant properties hold in a given case. We explore the possibilities for argumentation to resolve these two types of disagreement.
Commentary On Goddu, Patrick Francken
What Is A “Real” Argument?, G C. Goddu
What Is A “Real” Argument?, G C. Goddu
OSSA Conference Archive
Numerous informal logicians and argumentation theorists restrict their theorizing to what they call “real” arguments. But is there a clear distinction to be made between “real” and “non-real” arguments? Here I explore four possible accounts of the alleged distinction and argue that none can serve the theoretical uses to which the distinction is most often put.
Parrhesia: The Aesthetics Of Arguing Truth To Power, Gladys Thomas Goodnight
Parrhesia: The Aesthetics Of Arguing Truth To Power, Gladys Thomas Goodnight
OSSA Conference Archive
Parrhesia is the rhetorical figure of dissent par excellence. The essay argues that parrhesia is understood as risky argumentation within the rhetorical tradition. The relation of frank speech and flattery has been a core discussion about the predicaments of advocacy since Greece and Rome. Whereas Foucault models the term primarily from the aesthetic enactments of Euripides, the essay studies parrhesia as a mutually implicating struggle articulated in Sophoclean drama. Dilemmas of wartime dissent found in United States Congressional debate over Iraq are presented as a contemporary case study.
Commentary On Goodwin, Frans H. Van Eemeren
Commentary On Goodwin, Frans H. Van Eemeren
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Solitarist Thinking And Fragmentary Logic, Jim Gough, Mano Daniel
Solitarist Thinking And Fragmentary Logic, Jim Gough, Mano Daniel
OSSA Conference Archive
Amartya Sen and others argue that a distorted form of multiculturalism called plural monoculturalism fosters a potentially dangerous kind of multiculturalism based on solitarist thinking supported by fragmentary logic. We explicate the roles played by solitarist thinking, fragmentary logic and negative identity in defective forms of multiculturalism and argue that genuine multiculturalism is best understood using what we call particularist logic, pragmatically operating in context, to form the basis for a diversity of individual identities.
Commentary On Gough & Daniel, Derek Allen
Commentary On Gough & Daniel, Derek Allen
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Two Is A Small Number: False Dichotomies Revisited, Trudy Govier
Two Is A Small Number: False Dichotomies Revisited, Trudy Govier
OSSA Conference Archive
Our acceptance of falsely dichotomous statements is often intellectually distorting. It restricts imagination, limits opportunities, and lends support to pseudo-logical arguments. In conflict situations, the presumption that there are only two sides is often a harmful distortion. Why do so many false dichotomies seem plausible? Are all dichotomies false? What are the alternatives, if any, to such fundamental dichotomies as ‘true/false’, ‘yes/no’, ‘proponent/opponent,’ and ‘accept/reject’?
The Triple Contract: A Case Study Of A Source Blending Analogical Argument, Marcello Guarini
The Triple Contract: A Case Study Of A Source Blending Analogical Argument, Marcello Guarini
OSSA Conference Archive
One form of analogical argument proceeds by comparing a disputed case (the target) with an agreed upon case (the source) to try to resolve the dispute. There is a variation on preceding form of argument not yet identified in the theoretical literature. This variation involves multiple sources, and it requires that the sources be combined or blended for the argument to work. Arguments supporting the Triple Contract are shown to possess this structure.
Commentary On Guarini, David Hunter
Commentary On Govier, Erik E W Krabbe
Building A Winning Team: The Development Of Arguments In Criminal Cases, Kati Hannken-Illjes
Building A Winning Team: The Development Of Arguments In Criminal Cases, Kati Hannken-Illjes
OSSA Conference Archive
When ‘making a case’ in court, the defense lawyer engages different arguments in a situated performance. At the same time, these arguments have developed over time in front of different audiences. In this paper I will follow the construction of arguments in an actual criminal case from preparation to the trial by focusing on the developments and refinements of the arguments that inform and shape the case.
Commentary On Harkness, Thomas Fischer
‘So’, David Hitchcock
‘So’, David Hitchcock
OSSA Conference Archive
I argue, contrary to a recent assertion by Lilian Bermejo-Luque, that the inference-claim in an argument of the form ‘p, so q’ is not its associated material conditional ‘if p then q’. Rather, it is the claim that the argument has a covering generalization that is non-trivially true. I defend this interpretation against three objections by Bermejo-Luque.
Commentary On Hitchcock, Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Commentary On Hitchcock, Lilian Bermejo-Luque
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Hazen, Dale Hample
Commentary On Hoffmann, Joseph A. Novak
Dissensus As Value And Practice In Cultural Argument: The Tangled Web Of Argument, Con/Dis-Sensus, Values And Cultural Variations, Michael David Hazen
Dissensus As Value And Practice In Cultural Argument: The Tangled Web Of Argument, Con/Dis-Sensus, Values And Cultural Variations, Michael David Hazen
OSSA Conference Archive
This paper will initially explore the assumptions about dissensus and consensus embedded in the values of cultures such as the dimension of individualism/collectivism. This will lead into an examination of how the emerging ideas about cultural forms of argument relate to dissensus and consensus in cultural practices. Finally, the paper will explore the ways that argument as dissensus can bridge the gap between cultural values and practice.
Searching For Common Ground On Hamas Through Logical Argument Mapping, Michael H G Hoffmann
Searching For Common Ground On Hamas Through Logical Argument Mapping, Michael H G Hoffmann
OSSA Conference Archive
Robert Fogelin (1985) formulated the thesis “that deep disagreements cannot be resolved through the use of argument, for they undercut the conditions essential to arguing.” The possibility of arguing presupposes “a shared background of beliefs and preferences,” and if such a background is not given, there is no way of “rational” dispute resolution. By contrast to this pessimistic view, I will propose a method that has been developed to overcome difficulties as described by Fogelin.
Commentary On Hundleby, Margaret A. Cuonzo
Commentary On Hundleby, Margaret A. Cuonzo
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
The Need For Rhetorical Listening To Ground Scientific Objectivity, Catherine E. Hundleby
The Need For Rhetorical Listening To Ground Scientific Objectivity, Catherine E. Hundleby
OSSA Conference Archive
Recent work in feminist and postcolonial rhetoric demonstrates various meanings of silence (Glenn 2004). Listening rhetorically in order to comprehend silences (Ratcliffe 2006) is particularly difficult in scientific contexts, I argue, because the common ground for scientific discourse assumes a culture of disclosure. Rhetorical listening is also important to science because listening accounts for silence as well as disclosure, and so maximizes the diversity in recognized perspectives that provides scientific objectivity (Longino 1990; 2004).
Common Ground And Modal Disagreement, David Hunter
Common Ground And Modal Disagreement, David Hunter
OSSA Conference Archive
The common ground in an inquiry consists of what the participants agree on, at least for the sake of the inquiry. The relations between the factual and linguistic components of common ground are notoriously difficult to trace. I clarify them by exploring how modal disagreements – disagreements about how things might be – interact with the linguistic and the factual common ground. I argue that modal agreement is essential to common ground of any kind
Commentary On Hunter, G C. Goddu
Common Ground, Argument Form And Analogical Reductio Ad Absurdum, Hanrike Jansen
Common Ground, Argument Form And Analogical Reductio Ad Absurdum, Hanrike Jansen
OSSA Conference Archive
Most arguments can be presented in different forms, e.g. with explicit data or with an explicit inference license and, in the latter case, with a modus ponens- or a modus tollens-inference license. It is arguable that one form is more appropriate or effective with regard to a specific piece of argumentation than another. However, in this paper it is argued that with regard to analogical reductio ad absurdum argumentation, its alleged persuasive effect is due to a successful appeal to common ground and not to its form.
Commentary On Jorgensen, Christopher W. Tindale
Commentary On Jorgensen, Christopher W. Tindale
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Jansen, Takuzo Konishi
Anticipating Objections As A Way Of Coping With Dissensus, Ralph H. Johnson
Anticipating Objections As A Way Of Coping With Dissensus, Ralph H. Johnson
OSSA Conference Archive
One of the traditional ways in which we manage dissensus is by argumentation, which may be construed as the attempt of the proponent to persuade rationally the other party of the truth (or acceptability) of some thesis. To achieve this, the arguer will often anticipate a possible objection. In this paper, I attempt to shed light on the normative aspect of the task of anticipating objections. I deal with such questions as: How is the arguer to anticipate objections? Which of the anticipated objections are to be dealt with? What is required to deal successfully with an objection?