Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- N/A (99)
- Argumentation (64)
- Argument (32)
- Rhetoric (28)
- Critical thinking (25)
-
- Objectivity (20)
- Bias (19)
- Persuasion (14)
- Fallacy (13)
- Deep disagreement (12)
- Logic (12)
- Deliberation (11)
- Evidence (11)
- Pragma-dialectics (11)
- Fallacies (10)
- Inference (10)
- Reasoning (10)
- Virtue (10)
- Walton (10)
- Dialogue (9)
- Relevance (9)
- Argument evaluation (8)
- Conductive argument (8)
- Practical reasoning (8)
- Testimony (8)
- Trust (8)
- Argumentation schemes (7)
- Argumentation theory (7)
- Audience (7)
- Dialectic (7)
- Publication Year
Articles 1201 - 1230 of 1459
Full-Text Articles in Arts and Humanities
Commentary On Tiner, Vance Mendenhall
Teaching Freshmen To Reason—And Live—Through Aristotle's Modes Of Persuasion, Elza C. Tiner
Teaching Freshmen To Reason—And Live—Through Aristotle's Modes Of Persuasion, Elza C. Tiner
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
You Should Have Arguments For Your Views?, Dale Turner
You Should Have Arguments For Your Views?, Dale Turner
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Turner, Menashe Schwed
Evaluating Arguments Based On Toulmin’S Scheme, Bart Verheij
Evaluating Arguments Based On Toulmin’S Scheme, Bart Verheij
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
What We Reconstruct In Enthymeme Reconstruction: A Linguistiic-Argumentative Approach, Lev G. Vassiliev
What We Reconstruct In Enthymeme Reconstruction: A Linguistiic-Argumentative Approach, Lev G. Vassiliev
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Verheij, Peter Mcburney
Decision Theory As A Primary Part Of Critical Thinking Courses, Sheldon Wein
Decision Theory As A Primary Part Of Critical Thinking Courses, Sheldon Wein
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Incorrect Judicial Decisions, Robert J. Yanal
Incorrect Judicial Decisions, Robert J. Yanal
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Wein, Pierre J. Boulos
Textual Heterogeneity As An Argumentative Strategy: The Case Of Robbe-Grillet’S, Galia Yanoshevsky
Textual Heterogeneity As An Argumentative Strategy: The Case Of Robbe-Grillet’S, Galia Yanoshevsky
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Yanal, Richard Gaskins
Commentary On Yanoshevsky, A Van Den Hoven
Commentary On Yanoshevsky, A Van Den Hoven
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Language And Logic In China: A Guide For Argumentation Scholars, Mary M. Garrett
Language And Logic In China: A Guide For Argumentation Scholars, Mary M. Garrett
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Philosophizing Propaganda, Stanley B. Cunningham
Philosophizing Propaganda, Stanley B. Cunningham
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Garrett, Richard B. Angell
Commentary On Garrett, Richard B. Angell
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
The Differences Between Opinion And Argumentation, Jim Gough
The Differences Between Opinion And Argumentation, Jim Gough
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Eebrius: The Topos Of Drunkenness In Cicero’S Speeches, Crista Mcinnis
Eebrius: The Topos Of Drunkenness In Cicero’S Speeches, Crista Mcinnis
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Divided By Enlightenment: Habermas, Foucault And The Place Of Rhetoric, Kendall R. Phillips
Divided By Enlightenment: Habermas, Foucault And The Place Of Rhetoric, Kendall R. Phillips
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Truth And Premiss Adequacy, Robert C. Pinto
Truth And Premiss Adequacy, Robert C. Pinto
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Schwed, Daniel H. Cohen
Commentary On Novak, Jill Leblanc
Augustus De Morgan On Fallacy: Pettyfoggers And Controversialists, Marie Secor
Augustus De Morgan On Fallacy: Pettyfoggers And Controversialists, Marie Secor
OSSA Conference Archive
Augustus DeMorgan wrote an influential nineteenth-century treatise on logic, Formal Logic: The Calculus of Inference, Necessary and Probable, whose treatment of fallacy contributes significantly to the conversation carried on from Bentham to Alf red Sidgwick. Representing fallacy as concerning only inferential processes, DeMorgan focuses on ambiguous matters where it is difficult to determine whether the error resides in the matter or the form. His unpacking of terminological slipperiness and t actical maneuvering pushes his discussion from the logical towards the rhetorical. This study of nineteenth-century fallacy theory identifies logic's rhetorical turn and pulls out a strand connecting the histories of …
Commentary On Gellis, Michael Leff
Commentary On Hegelund & Kock, Jean Goodwin
Commentary On Hegelund & Kock, Jean Goodwin
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Hoaglund, Leo Groarke
Commentary On Gough, Claude Gratton
Commentary On Goodwin, Mark Gellis
Dialectics Of Criticism: Argumentation In Literary Reviews, Rob Grootendorst
Dialectics Of Criticism: Argumentation In Literary Reviews, Rob Grootendorst
OSSA Conference Archive
Criticism is a neglected subject in the study of argumentation. In my talk, I explore the possibility of a pragma-dialectical analysis in literary reviews as a specific type of criticism. I argue that literary reviews are argumentative texts in which the critic attempts to convince the readers that his or her judgment is right or, at east, acceptable. The resolution of this nonmixed dispute between the critic as a protagonist and the reader as an antagonist is, pragma-dialectically speaking, highly problematic. First, there is no consensus among critics or between critics and their readers with respect to the norms for …
Rhetoric And Dialectic In The Twenty-First Century, Michael Leff
Rhetoric And Dialectic In The Twenty-First Century, Michael Leff
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.