Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Agency deference (1)
- Chevron U.S.A. (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Contemporary politics (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- EPA (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Environmental regulation (1)
- Federal judiciary (1)
- Ideology (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1)
- Interest groups (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial accountability (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Policy agents (1)
- Presidential immunity (1)
- Retrenchment of private enforcement (1)
- Rule challenges (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Scrutiny (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Public Administration
Litigating Epa Rules: A Fifty-Year Retrospective Of Environmental Rulemaking In The Courts, Cary Coglianese, Daniel E. Walters
Litigating Epa Rules: A Fifty-Year Retrospective Of Environmental Rulemaking In The Courts, Cary Coglianese, Daniel E. Walters
All Faculty Scholarship
Over the last fifty years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has found itself repeatedly defending its regulations before federal judges. The agency’s engagement with the federal judiciary has resulted in prominent Supreme Court decisions, such as Chevron v. NRDC and Massachusetts v. EPA, which have left a lasting imprint on federal administrative law. Such prominent litigation has also fostered, for many observers, a longstanding impression of an agency besieged by litigation. In particular, many lawyers and scholars have long believed that unhappy businesses or environmental groups challenge nearly every EPA rule in court. Although some empirical studies have …
Reconsidering Judicial Independence: Forty-Five Years In The Trenches And In The Tower, Stephen B. Burbank
Reconsidering Judicial Independence: Forty-Five Years In The Trenches And In The Tower, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
Trusting in the integrity of our institutions when they are not under stress, we focus attention on them both when they are under stress or when we need them to protect us against other institutions. In the case of the federal judiciary, the two conditions often coincide. In this essay, I use personal experience to provide practical context for some of the important lessons about judicial independence to be learned from the periods of stress for the federal judiciary I have observed as a lawyer and concerned citizen, and to provide theoretical context for lessons I have deemed significant as …