Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights (1)
- Class Analysis (1)
- Cognition (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Domination (1)
-
- Economics (1)
- Empirical Tests of Moral Theory (1)
- General Law (1)
- History (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Objectivity (1)
- Marxism (1)
- Milton Fisk (1)
- Moral Objectivity (1)
- Moral Progress (1)
- OIppressiuon (1)
- Opiginal Position (1)
- Politics (1)
- Power (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Radical Justice (1)
- Rawls (1)
- Reflective Equilibrium (1)
- Relativism (1)
- Resistance (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Cognitive Psychology
Inconsistency As Consistency: An Optimal Policy For Human Rights, Ibpp Editor
Inconsistency As Consistency: An Optimal Policy For Human Rights, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article contrasts two common cognitive approaches employed by United States (US) politicians in furthering human rights throughout the world.
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
THIS PAPER IS THE CO-WINNER OF THE FRED BERGER PRIZE IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW FOR THE 1999 AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BEST PUBLISHED PAPER IN THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS.
The conflict between liberal legal theory and critical legal studies (CLS) is often framed as a matter of whether there is a theory of justice that the law should embody which all rational people could or must accept. In a divided society, the CLS critique of this view is overwhelming: there is no such justice that can command universal assent. But the liberal critique of CLS, that it degenerates into …