Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (20)
- Judges (18)
- Law and Politics (14)
- Courts (6)
- American Politics (4)
-
- Criminal Law (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Legal Profession (3)
- Sociology (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Communication (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Intelligence (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Discourse and Text Linguistics (1)
- Economics (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (15)
- Oral argument (6)
- Ideology (5)
- Judicial behavior (4)
- Interruptions (3)
-
- State supreme courts (3)
- Voting patterns (3)
- Appointments (2)
- Campaign contributions (2)
- Conservatism (2)
- Intellectual property (2)
- Judges (2)
- Judicial appointments (2)
- Judicial elections (2)
- Judicial independence (2)
- Justices (2)
- Liberalism (2)
- Partisanship (2)
- Academic legal scholarship (1)
- Advocacy (1)
- Aggregation bias (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Apex courts (1)
- Attitudinal model (1)
- Bayesian learning (1)
- Binding precedent (1)
- California (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
- Candidate-litigated election disputes (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Models and Methods
The Intimacy Discount: Prosecutorial Discretion, Privacy, And Equality In The Statutory Rape Caseload, Kay L. Levine
The Intimacy Discount: Prosecutorial Discretion, Privacy, And Equality In The Statutory Rape Caseload, Kay L. Levine
Faculty Articles
This Article proceeds as follows. It begins in Part I by presenting the structural and case-based factors that scholars have identified as relevant to prosecutorial decision-making in the United States. Part II considers the existing social science research documenting the relationship between intimacy and criminal Justice treatment. Part III explains the empirical study of California prosecutors on which this Article's data and conclusions are based. After introducing California's statutory rape prosecution program in Part IV, the Article describes in Part V how the program's underlying rationale led to the development and deployment of prosecutorial assessments of intimacy and exploitation in …
The Law Is Not The Case: Incorporating Empirical Methods Into The Culture Of Case Analysis, Kay L. Levine
The Law Is Not The Case: Incorporating Empirical Methods Into The Culture Of Case Analysis, Kay L. Levine
Faculty Articles
While I consider case analysis in the context of cultural defense jurisprudence, this Essay should be regarded as a case study of a more endemic problem in legal scholarship. In tackling such an area, my goal is not to overthrow centuries of legal analysis, but rather to explore how we, as legal scholars, might use social science techniques to more systematically investigate, document, analyze, and predict the state of a particular comer of the legal universe.
The argument proceeds in two parts. Part II considers empirical approaches to the question raised by Lee: how might we ascertain the relationship between …
Deterrence Versus Brutalization: Capital Punishment's Differing Impacts Among States, Joanna M. Shepherd
Deterrence Versus Brutalization: Capital Punishment's Differing Impacts Among States, Joanna M. Shepherd
Faculty Articles
Recent empirical studies by economists have shown, without exception, that capital punishment deters crime. Using large data sets that combine information from all fifty states over many years, the studies show that, on average, an additional execution deters many murders. The studies have received much publicity, and death penalty advocates often cite them to show that capital punishment is sound policy.
Indeed, deterrence is the central basis that many policymakers and courts cite for capital punishment. For example, President Bush believes that capital punishment deters crime and that deterrence is the only valid reason for capital punishment. Likewise, the Supreme …