Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abolition of Familty (1)
- Alternative Childrearing Arrangements (1)
- Choice (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Communitarianism (1)
-
- Competition (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Delivery of Health Care (1)
- Fair Equality of Opportunity (1)
- Family (1)
- Free markets (1)
- General Law (1)
- Health Policy (1)
- Health Services Research (1)
- Health care reform (1)
- Human Nature (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- John Rawls (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice (1)
- Justice as Fairness (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Marxist Critique of Justice (1)
- Original Position (1)
- Plato (1)
- Politics (1)
- Pragmatism (1)
- Priority of Justice (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Political Economy
Aca Implementation In The South: The Political Economy Of Full Participation In Kentucky, Glen P. Mays
Aca Implementation In The South: The Political Economy Of Full Participation In Kentucky, Glen P. Mays
Glen Mays
This analysis, conducted as part of the ACA Implementation Research Network, examines economic and political forces shaping Kentucky's early experience with implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Healthy Competition: What’S Holding Back Health Care And How To Free It, Michael F. Cannon
Healthy Competition: What’S Holding Back Health Care And How To Free It, Michael F. Cannon
Michael F. Cannon
No abstract provided.
Rights Of Inequality: Rawlsian Justice, Equal Opportunity, And The Status Of The Family, Justin Schwartz
Rights Of Inequality: Rawlsian Justice, Equal Opportunity, And The Status Of The Family, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
Is the family subject to principles of justice? In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls includes the (monogamous) family along with the market and the government as among the "basic institutions of society" to which principles of justice apply. Justice, he famously insists, is primary in politics as truth is in science: the only excuse for tolerating injustice is that no lesser injustice is possible. The point of the present paper is that Rawls doesn't actually mean this. When it comes to the family, and in particular its impact on fair equal opportunity (the first part of the the Difference …