Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (65)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (33)
- Economics (30)
- Law and Economics (27)
- Business (21)
-
- Arts and Humanities (15)
- Law and Society (15)
- Legal Studies (14)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (12)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (11)
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Intellectual Property Law (11)
- Courts (10)
- Industrial Organization (10)
- Technology and Innovation (9)
- Criminal Law (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Philosophy (8)
- Psychology (8)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (8)
- Science and Technology Law (8)
- Science and Technology Policy (8)
- Health Law and Policy (7)
- Legal Theory (7)
- Political Economy (7)
- Political Science (7)
- Public Policy (7)
- Sociology (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (7)
- Patents (7)
- Competition (4)
- Copyright (4)
- Criminal law (4)
-
- Intellectual property (4)
- Monopoly (4)
- Corporate governance (3)
- Corporations (3)
- Decision making (3)
- Hatch-Waxman (3)
- Innovation (3)
- Law and economics (3)
- Cartels (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Coase (2)
- Coase theorem (2)
- Compulsion (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Corporate finance (2)
- Economics (2)
- Eighth Amendment (2)
- Law (2)
- Obamacare (2)
- Punishment (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Securities law (2)
- Social welfare (2)
- Terrorism (2)
- Transaction costs (2)
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
On What Distinguishes New Originalism From Old: A Jurisprudential Take, Mitchell N. Berman
On What Distinguishes New Originalism From Old: A Jurisprudential Take, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Coercion, Compulsion, And The Medicaid Expansion: A Study In The Doctrine Of Unconstitutional Conditions, Mitchell N. Berman
Coercion, Compulsion, And The Medicaid Expansion: A Study In The Doctrine Of Unconstitutional Conditions, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius regarding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act produced three main holdings concerning two critical provisions of the Act. The first two holdings concerned the “individual mandate” that requires most Americans to maintain “minimum essential” health insurance. The third holding concerned “the Medicaid expansion,” which expanded the class of persons to whom the states must provide Medicaid coverage as a condition for receiving federal funds under the Medicaid program. By a vote of 7-2, the Court struck down this provision as an impermissible condition on …
Managerial Judging And Substantive Law, Tobias Barrington Wolff
Managerial Judging And Substantive Law, Tobias Barrington Wolff
All Faculty Scholarship
The figure of the proactive jurist, involved in case management from the outset of the litigation and attentive throughout the proceedings to the impact of her decisions on settlement dynamics -- a managerial judge -- has displaced the passive umpire as the dominant paradigm in the federal district courts. Thus far, discussions of managerial judging have focused primarily upon values endogenous to the practice of judging. Procedural scholarship has paid little attention to the impact of the underlying substantive law on the parameters and conduct of complex proceedings.
In this Article, I examine the interface between substantive law and managerial …
Historicizing The "End Of Men": The Politics Of Reaction(S), Serena Mayeri
Historicizing The "End Of Men": The Politics Of Reaction(S), Serena Mayeri
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Market For Justice: A First Empirical Look At Third Party Litigation Funding, David S. Abrams, Daniel L. Chen
A Market For Justice: A First Empirical Look At Third Party Litigation Funding, David S. Abrams, Daniel L. Chen
All Faculty Scholarship
The alienability of legal claims holds the promise of increasing access to justice and fostering development of the law. While much theoretical work points to this possibility, no empirical work has investigated the claims, largely due to the rarity of trading in legal claims in modern systems of law. In this paper we take the first step toward empirically testing some of these theoretical claims using data from Australia. We find some evidence that third-party funding corresponds to an increase in litigation and court caseloads. Cases with third-party funders are more prominent than comparable ones. While third-party funding may have …
The Lawyer's Toolbox: Teaching Students About Risk Allocation, Dana Malkus, Scott Stevenson, Eric J. Gouvin, Usha Rodrigues
The Lawyer's Toolbox: Teaching Students About Risk Allocation, Dana Malkus, Scott Stevenson, Eric J. Gouvin, Usha Rodrigues
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article is the transcript of a panel presented at Emory’s Third Biennial Conference on Transactional Education. The panel focuses on techniques for teaching risk allocation as part of transactional skills classes. The panelists describe their approaches to teaching risk allocation, from syllabus design to final evaluations. How can a professor help students to understand the basic concepts of risk, the role risk plays in business and legal decisions, and how they can help clients manage risk. The techniques for teaching risk allocation include hypotheticals, visual aids, and hands-on assignments. The panelists each take their students down a different path …