Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons^™

The Past And Future Of Legal Scholarship, Mark Kelman

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Book Review Of Imprisonment In America: Choosing The Future, Sheldon Krantz

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Field Technique For The Identification Of Deer Blood, David W. Oates, Carol A. Jochum, Kenneth A. Pearson, Cathy A. Hoilien

Nebraska Game and Parks Commission: Staff Research Publications

A latex suspension sensitized with deer antiserum has been prepared, placed on plastic cards, dried, and packaged for field use. The product was tested against bloodstains from 22 species (including Homo sapiens). Strong agglutination reactions occurred only with bloodstains from deer and elk.

06-15-1983 Memorandum To The Conference, William H. Rehnquist

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Justice Rehnquist discusses Colorado v. Quintero, No. 82-1711, with respects to Illinois v. Gates, No. 81-430.

06-15-1983 Memorandum To The Conference, William H. Rehnquist

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Rehnquist refers to No. 82-963 - Massachusetts v. Sheppard in regard to the good faith reliance on the search warrant.

06-02-1983 Correspondence From Blackmun To Renhquist, Harry A. Blackmun

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Memo from Justice Blackmun to Justice Rehnquist to join him.

05-31-1983 Correspondence From Rehnquist To Blackmun, William H. Rehnquist

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from Rehnquist to Blackmun accepting changes.

05-25-1983 Correspondence From Burger To Rehnquist, Warren E. Burger

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from Chief Justice Burger to Rehnquist indicating that he joins him.

05-25-1983 Clerk Memo, Alan S. Madans

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Mr. Justice:

The CJ has now joined WHR's draft. You are the only one out in this case, and your vote will determine whether WHR gets a Court for his opinion.

Opinion Of The Court, William H. Rehnquist

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the court on Illinois v. Gates - 3rd draft.

05-11-1983 Correspondence From Marshall To Brennan, Thurgood Marshall

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from Marshall to Brennan asking him to join him in his opinion.

Justice Brennan, Dissenting, William J. Brennan

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Justice Brennan's draft opinion on Illinois v. Gates.

05-08-1983 Clerk Memo, Alan S. Madans

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Law clerk memo outlining the current positions of the US Supreme Court Justices' on Ill. v. Gates, and recommending joining Chief Rehnquist's opinion pending certain corrections.

Justice White, Concurring, Byron R. White

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Justice White's concurring opinion on Illinois v. Gates.

05-31-1983 Correspondence From Blackmun To Rehnquist, Harry A. Blackmun

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Corrections suggested to Rehnquist by Blackmun regarding Illinois v. Gates.

04-28-1983 Correspondence From Powell To Rehnquist, Lewis F. Powell

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from Powell to Rehnquist requesting him to join him in his opinion.

04-25-1983 Correspondence From White To Rehnquist, Byron R. White

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from White to Rehnquist, saying he will write separately.

04-21-1983 Correspondence From Brennan To Stevens, William J. Brennan

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from Brennan to Stevens, asking him to join him in Steven's dissent.

04-21-1983 Correspondence From Brennan To Rehnquist, William J. Brennan

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from Brennan to Rehnquist saying that he is writing his own dissent.

04-13-1983 Correspondence From O'Connor To Rehnquist, Sandra Day O'Connor

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Correspondence from O'Connor to Rehnquist asking him to join her.

03-04-1983 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Harry A Blackmun's handwritten notes during the oral argument of Illinois v. Gates.

03-01-1983 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Harry A Blackmun's handwritten notes during the oral argument of Illinois v. Gates.

Bench Memorandum, Alan S. Madans

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

This Court granted cert to decide whether a partially corroborated anonymous informer's tip provided probable cause for the issuance of a warrant. At Conference a majority voted to hold that the warrant was valid, but also expressed interest in exploring a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. The Court restored the case to the calendar so this question could be briefed and argued.

02-27-1983 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

Harry A Blackmun's handwritten notes during the oral argument of Illinois v. Gates.

Motion Of The Solicitor General For Leave To Reply Brief As Amicus Curiae, David A. Schlueter

Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

After the Court restored this case to the calendar for re argument, the SG filed an amicus brief. Resps and other amici filed briefs and directed many of their arguments to the SG ' s brief. The SG now moves for special leave to file a reply brief as amicus so that he might address those arguments. He recognizes that Rule 36.5 of this Court's Rules disallows such filings but contends that the importance of the Fourth Amendment issue presented and the United States' substantial interest warrant an exception.

Delayed Perfection Of Security Interests In Personal Property And The Substantially Contemporaneous Exchange Exception To Preference Attack, Richard F. Duncan

Nebraska College of Law: Faculty Publications

The Bankruptcy Reform Act's treatment of belatedly perfected security interests in personal property is enigmatic, because it attempts to employ preference law to avoid a class of transfers, socalled "secret liens," that are not true preferences. When a security interest is granted in exchange for contemporaneous value, preference policy in bankruptcy is not offended, because the transaction does not cause a depletion of the debtor's estate for the benefit of a particular creditor. However, the effect the timing rules of section 547(e) of the New Act is to treat most security interests perfected during the preference period and more than …

The Master Of Science In Criminal Justice Without Interrupting Your Career, Nova Southeastern University

College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Course Catalogs

No abstract provided.

Egyptian Youth And Justice Systems: A Rural-Urban Comparison, Mark Kennedy

Faculty Book Chapters

This work on urban research strategies in Egypt is the product of several factors. First of all is the challenge, excitement, diversity and stimulation of living in Egyptian cities, Cairo above all. Not only are Egyptian cities rooted in deep antiquity, but they have the richly stratified layers of a host of great civilizations. Modern urban Egypt is immeasurably complex in its own right, but its quite astounding past only adds to its wonderment. Thus, the chief inspiration for this publication is the wealthy cultural and historical context in which these scholars were assembled and where they sought to interpret …

A Due Process Analysis Of Judicially-Authorized Presumptions In Federal Aggravated Bank Robbery Cases, James F. Ponsoldt

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

The Legal/Extra-Legal Controversy: Judicial Decisions In Pretrial Release, Ilene H. Nagel

Articles by Maurer Faculty

This study analyzes data for state criminal defendants prosecuted in New York to determine the bases upon which judges make pretrial release decisions for these defendants. Treating statutory law as defining the category of legal variables, it finds legal factors substantially affect decisions about whether to release a defendant on recognizance, the amount of bail required, and whether to offer a defendant a cash alternative to a surety bond. The impact of these factors varies, however, depending upon the particular decision being made. Factors not prescribed in the statute-extra-legal factors—are also found to affect these pretrial release decisions. Their impact, …