Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Life Sciences (9)
- Sustainability (8)
- Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment (7)
- Natural Resources and Conservation (7)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (7)
-
- Environmental Health and Protection (5)
- Chemistry (4)
- Data Science (4)
- Engineering (4)
- Environmental Education (4)
- Environmental Studies (4)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (4)
- Water Resource Management (4)
- Civil and Environmental Engineering (3)
- Climate (3)
- Computer Sciences (3)
- Earth Sciences (3)
- Environmental Monitoring (3)
- Forest Sciences (3)
- Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology (3)
- Statistics and Probability (3)
- Biology (2)
- Chemical Engineering (2)
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (2)
- Education (2)
- Environmental Engineering (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Institution
-
- University of South Alabama (3)
- Fordham University (2)
- Old Dominion University (2)
- The University of San Francisco (2)
- The University of Southern Mississippi (2)
-
- University of Dar es Salaam (2)
- Arkansas Tech University (1)
- Cal Poly Humboldt (1)
- Calvin University (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Clemson University (1)
- Colby College (1)
- East Tennessee State University (1)
- Kennesaw State University (1)
- Louisiana State University (1)
- Murray State University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Portland State University (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Texas at Arlington (1)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (1)
- Western Kentucky University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Environment (2)
- Environmental Science (2)
- Geospatial (2)
- Machine learning (2)
- Modeling (2)
-
- Wildfire (2)
- Agnosticism (1)
- Agroforestry (1)
- Alfred Russel Wallace (1)
- Amazon (1)
- Arctic shipping (1)
- Benthic nutrient flux (1)
- Bibliometric mapping (1)
- Biology (1)
- Black Huckleberry (1)
- Black carbon (1)
- Black nitrogen (1)
- Boron isotopes (1)
- Caribbean studies (1)
- Catalysis (1)
- Chesapeake Bay (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Climate resilience (1)
- Climate vulnerability (1)
- Coast redwoods (1)
- Coastal Mississippi land use constraints (1)
- Coastal redwoods (1)
- Conservation (1)
- Corals (1)
- Cuba precipitation (1)
- Publication
-
- Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2019 - present) (2)
- Honors Theses (2)
- Master's Projects and Capstones (2)
- Student Theses 2015-Present (2)
- ATU Scholars Symposium (1)
-
- Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles and Research (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Chemistry & Biochemistry Theses & Dissertations (1)
- Dissertations (1)
- Dissertations and Theses (1)
- Earth & Environmental Sciences Theses (1)
- Electronic Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Faculty/Staff Personal Papers (1)
- Forestry and Natural Resources (1)
- Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers (1)
- Gulf and Caribbean Research (1)
- Honors College Theses (1)
- IdeaFest: Interdisciplinary Journal of Creative Works and Research from Cal Poly Humboldt (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- LSU Doctoral Dissertations (1)
- Master's Theses (1)
- OES Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Seaver College Research And Scholarly Achievement Symposium (1)
- Tanzania Journal of Science (1)
- Theses and Dissertations (1)
- University Faculty Publications and Creative Works (1)
- University Honors Theses (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Other Environmental Sciences
Real-Time Immersive Wildfire Simulation: A Game Engine Approach, Jake Bova
Real-Time Immersive Wildfire Simulation: A Game Engine Approach, Jake Bova
Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers
Wildfires are growing in frequency, size, and severity, placing escalating demands on firefighting resources and putting lives, property, and ecosystems at risk. Accurate prediction of fire behavior is critical to suppression planning, evacuation decisions, and firefighter training, yet the operational models that fire managers rely upon face a persistent tradeoff. High-fidelity physics-based models capture fire–atmosphere interactions faithfully but are computationally expensive, often running far slower than real time on CPU hardware, while faster empirical models sacrifice the dynamic coupling between a fire and the wind field it generates. Furthermore, most existing tools produce abstract, two-dimensional outputs that offer limited visual …