Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings

1993

Articles 31 - 34 of 34

Full-Text Articles in Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Urban Nuisance Wildlife Control In Kentucky, Thomas G. Barnes Dec 1993

Urban Nuisance Wildlife Control In Kentucky, Thomas G. Barnes

Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings

A variety of factors including increased urbanization, decreased funding for governmental animal damage programs, and increases in some urban wildlife populations have resulted in a greater demand for urban nuisance wildlife control. Historically, this demand was met by Cooperative Extension Service (San Julian 1987), state fish and wildlife agency, or USDA-APHIS-ADC employees (Bollengier 1987). These agencies provided educational materials, consultations, and/or physically removed animals. Recently, there is an increased demand for physical animal removal evidenced by increasing numbers of private pest control operators (PCO) specializing as urban nuisance wildlife control operators (NWCO).


Livestock Protection Collars In The United States, 1988-19931, Guy Connolly Dec 1993

Livestock Protection Collars In The United States, 1988-19931, Guy Connolly

Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings

The livestock protection collar (LP Collar) i: one of the few technical innovations: developed over the past 20 years fog managing coyote depredation on livestock Invented by Roy McBride in 1970, the LF Collar was researched at length by the Denver Wildlife Research Center (DWRC; and several cooperators before being approved for use with Compound 1080 by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1985 (Burns et al. 1988, 1991; Connolly et al. 1978; Connolly 1980, 1985, 1990; Connolly and Burns 1990; Littauer 1984; Scrivner 1983; Scrivner and Wade 1986; TAMU 1983).


Endangered Species And Pesticides: The Kansas Program, Sue Ann Funk Dec 1993

Endangered Species And Pesticides: The Kansas Program, Sue Ann Funk

Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), because of its responsibility for registering pesticides for use in the U.S., is subject to the restrictions of federal Endangered Species Law. Before a pesticide can be registered, and subsequently marketed, EPA must guarantee that specific pesticides will not place an endangered species in peril. The Division of Plant Health of the Kansas State Board of Agriculture has received a grant from EPA to enforce the protection of listed species from pesticide exposure in Kansas.


How To Involve Local Communities In Wildlife Damage Control Decision-Malting, Scott R. Craven Dec 1993

How To Involve Local Communities In Wildlife Damage Control Decision-Malting, Scott R. Craven

Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings

In most cases the impetus for wildlife damage control (ADC) comes from the individual or group victimized by the problem, i.e., the farmers losing crops to migrating waterfowl or the homeowners frustrated with the loss of valuable ornamental plants to marauding deer. These "victims" or "stakeholders" are clearly best positioned to describe the nature and extent of the problem, how they feel about it, and to comment on what action could/should be taken to reduce or end the problem.