Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Large or Food Animal and Equine Medicine Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Life Sciences (54)
- Animal Sciences (50)
- Meat Science (45)
- Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public Health (45)
- Veterinary Microbiology and Immunobiology (6)
-
- Veterinary Infectious Diseases (4)
- Agriculture (2)
- Animal Diseases (2)
- Diseases (2)
- Food Science (2)
- Plant Sciences (2)
- Veterinary Physiology (2)
- Agricultural Education (1)
- Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment (1)
- Animal Studies (1)
- Cell Biology (1)
- Cell and Developmental Biology (1)
- Chemicals and Drugs (1)
- Dairy Science (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Entomology (1)
- Genetics and Genomics (1)
- Immune System Diseases (1)
- Immunology and Infectious Disease (1)
- Nutrition (1)
- Organisms (1)
- Other Animal Sciences (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Animals (6)
- Horses (6)
- Equine (4)
- Female (3)
- Horse (3)
-
- Male (3)
- Mare (3)
- Antibodies, Protozoan (2)
- Coccidiosis (2)
- Cross-Sectional Studies (2)
- EAV (2)
- EVA (2)
- Equine arteritis virus (2)
- Equine viral arteritis (2)
- Feces (2)
- Horse Diseases (2)
- Neospora (2)
- Persistent infection (2)
- Sarcocystis (2)
- Sarcocystis neurona (2)
- Seroepidemiologic Studies (2)
- AGID (1)
- Age Distribution (1)
- Alternatives to antibiotics (1)
- Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena (1)
- Antibodies, Neutralizing (1)
- Antibodies, Viral (1)
- Antimicrobial growth promoter (1)
- Arteritis Virus, Equine (1)
- Arterivirus (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 67 of 67
Full-Text Articles in Large or Food Animal and Equine Medicine
Perceptions Of Crop Consultants And Producers On Grazing Corn Residue In Nebraska, Jordan L. Cox, Kristen M. Ulmer, Manir Rakkar Rakkar, Lisa Franzen-Castle, Humberto Blanco-Canqui, Mary Drewnoski, Jim C. Macdonald, Richard J. Rasby
Perceptions Of Crop Consultants And Producers On Grazing Corn Residue In Nebraska, Jordan L. Cox, Kristen M. Ulmer, Manir Rakkar Rakkar, Lisa Franzen-Castle, Humberto Blanco-Canqui, Mary Drewnoski, Jim C. Macdonald, Richard J. Rasby
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
A survey was conducted to explore factors influencing corn residue grazing recommendations by crop consultants and producer practices in Nebraska. Approximately 80% of consultants recommended grazing corn residue, while 63% of producers allowed grazing. Of producers who did not graze, about 50% cited concerns related to soil compaction, inconvenience (lack of water, fencing, and land/equipment damage), and lack of access to livestock. Producers who allowed and consultants who recommended grazing were more likely to perceive that grazing residue increased subsequent grain yields. Most consultants (56.0%) and producers (43.8%) reported making decisions in regards to grazing based on their own observation. …
Pooled Gain Analysis Of Steers Grazing Corn Residue And Supplemented With Distillers Grains, Cody A. Welchons, Jim C. Macdonald
Pooled Gain Analysis Of Steers Grazing Corn Residue And Supplemented With Distillers Grains, Cody A. Welchons, Jim C. Macdonald
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
A pooled analysis combined data from three trials in which steer calves grazing corn residue were supplemented with distillers grains at varying amounts as a percent of BW. A regression equation was calculated in order to provide an accurate estimate of gain for calves fed distillers grains at various rates. Steers supplemented with distillers grains in a range from 0.3 to 1.1% of BW (1.5 to 6.5 lb / steer daily) had estimated gains that ranged from 1.07 to 1.94 lb / d. Th is prediction equation provides an estimate of gain for calves supplemented with distillers grains at various …
Effect Of Feeding Field Peas On Fresh Beef Quality, Hope R. Voegele, Katherine I. Domenech, Emery K. Kunze Kunze, Felipe A. Ribeiro, Karla H. Jenkins, Jim C. Macdonald, Chris R. Calkins
Effect Of Feeding Field Peas On Fresh Beef Quality, Hope R. Voegele, Katherine I. Domenech, Emery K. Kunze Kunze, Felipe A. Ribeiro, Karla H. Jenkins, Jim C. Macdonald, Chris R. Calkins
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
Th is study was conducted over two years to evaluate the use of field peas during two phases of production (grazing and finishing) on overall fresh beef quality. The backgrounding treatments included: no supplement, field peas, or dry- rolled corn and finishing treatments included the presence or absence of field peas. Loin samples (n = 232) were aged for 14 d and placed under retail display conditions for 7 d. Dietary treatments had no effect on tenderness (WBSF or SSF) or visual discoloration and minimal effects on objective color, lipid oxidation and fatty acid composition. These data indicate field peas …
Nutrient Content Of Summer-Planted Oats After Corn Harvest And Grazing Performance, Kristen M. Ulmer, Robert G. Bondurant, Jana L. Gramkow Gramkow, Mary E. Drewnoski, James C. Macdonald
Nutrient Content Of Summer-Planted Oats After Corn Harvest And Grazing Performance, Kristen M. Ulmer, Robert G. Bondurant, Jana L. Gramkow Gramkow, Mary E. Drewnoski, James C. Macdonald
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
Annual forages provide producers with an alternative grazing source in the fall. A cover crop grazing study was conducted following corn harvest to evaluate the steer ADG and yield of summer sown oats and turnips planted after either high moisture corn or corn silage production. Th e gain of steers grazing oats aft er silage was 1.29 lb/day, while the gain of steers grazing corn residue and oats aft er high moisture corn was 0.72 lb/day. Average oat forage production aft er silage harvest was 2857 lb/acre, while oat production following corn harvest was 523 lb/ acre. Fall forage production …
Statistics Used In The Nebraska Beef Report And Their Purpose
Statistics Used In The Nebraska Beef Report And Their Purpose
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
The purpose of beef cattle and beef product research at UNL is to provide reference information that represents the various populations (cows, calves, heifers, feeders, carcasses, retail products, etc) of beef production. Obviously, the researcher cannot apply treatments to every member of a population; therefore he/ she must sample the population. The use of statistics allows the researcher and readers of the Nebraska Beef report the opportunity to evaluate separation of random (chance) occurrences and real biological effects of a treatment. Following is a brief description of the major statistics used in the beef report. For a more detailed description …
Effect Of Heifer Development System On Reproduction And Subsequent Gain As A Pregnant Heifer, Shelby A. Springman, Hazy Rae Nielson, Tonya L. Meyer, Mike Kirby, Jim Teichert, Richard N. Funston
Effect Of Heifer Development System On Reproduction And Subsequent Gain As A Pregnant Heifer, Shelby A. Springman, Hazy Rae Nielson, Tonya L. Meyer, Mike Kirby, Jim Teichert, Richard N. Funston
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
Weaned heifers grazed corn residue, upland range, or were fed 1 of 2 drylot diets differing in energy. Heifer development diets did not impact their resulting AI or final pregnancy rates. Cost per pregnant heifer was similar among treatments. A subset of AI- pregnant heifers was placed in a Calan Broadbent individual feeding system during late gestation. As a pregnant heifer, feed efficiency was not impacted by development system. These results indicate producers may utilize their most readily available and/or cost- effective feed resources with no detriment to pregnancy rates or feed efficiency as first- calf heifers.
Effect Of Three Initial Implant Programs With A Common Terminal Revalor®- 200 On Feedlot Performance And Carcass Traits Of Weaned Steers, Colton R. Oney, Galen E. Erickson, Andrea K. Watson Watson, Marshall N. Streeter, Robert J. Cooper, Bill D. Dicke, D. J. Jordon, Tony L. Scott
Effect Of Three Initial Implant Programs With A Common Terminal Revalor®- 200 On Feedlot Performance And Carcass Traits Of Weaned Steers, Colton R. Oney, Galen E. Erickson, Andrea K. Watson Watson, Marshall N. Streeter, Robert J. Cooper, Bill D. Dicke, D. J. Jordon, Tony L. Scott
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
A commercial feedlot study utilizing 1,350 calf- fed steers (initial BW = 623 lb; ±23 lb) compared three initial implant strategies: Revalor®- IS (day 1), Revalor®- IS (day 1) and Revalor®- 200 (day 67), or Revalor®- XS (day 1). Each initial implant strategy was followed by a terminal Revalor®- 200 implant (day 133) to determine effects on performance and carcass traits. No differences in final body weight, intake, gain, or feed conversion were observed on either a live, or carcass adjusted basis. Th ere were also no differences in hot carcass weight, USDA quality grade, or USDA yield grade. Results …