Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Animals (1)
- Batch effects (1)
- CRISPR/Cas9 (1)
- Congenital malformations (1)
- Drosophila (1)
-
- Drosophila Proteins (1)
- Drosophila melanogaster (1)
- Drosophila proteins (1)
- Genomic screen (1)
- Grossly deformed (1)
- Homeodomain Proteins (1)
- Homeodomain proteins (1)
- MEK (1)
- MRNA (1)
- Malformations (1)
- Melanoma (1)
- MiRNA (1)
- Modification circuitry (1)
- NRAS (1)
- PDPK1 (1)
- Position 34 of the anticodon (1)
- Position 37 on the 3′-side of the anticodon (1)
- Post-transcriptional modifications (1)
- Pyroptosis (1)
- Serious deviations (1)
- Skin cancer (1)
- Study of abnormalities of physiological development (1)
- TCGA (1)
- TRNA anticodon (1)
- Targeted therapy (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Genetic Structures
Systematic Evaluation Of Batch Effects In The Cancer Genome Atlas Program Underscores The Need For Batch-Controlled Analysis, Zhongxuan Chen, Stepan Nersisyan, Isidore Rigoutsos, Eric Londin
Systematic Evaluation Of Batch Effects In The Cancer Genome Atlas Program Underscores The Need For Batch-Controlled Analysis, Zhongxuan Chen, Stepan Nersisyan, Isidore Rigoutsos, Eric Londin
Alpha Omega Alpha Research Symposium Posters
Purpose: To systematically assess the impact of batch effects on differential expression of isomiR, mRNA, and non-coding RNA (sncRNA) across 13 The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cancer types and develop a standardized, batch-controlled analysis protocol for TCGA datasets.
Methods: Data analysis and visualization were performed using Python v3.12. Plots were generated using matplotlib and seaborn. isomiR, mRNA, and sncRNA sequences across 13 TCGA cancer types were used. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed using scikit-learn for dimensionality reduction. Differential expression was conducted using DESeq2 under the following protocols: 1) primary tumor samples vs matched normal samples processed in the same …
Stem-Loop And Circle-Loop Tads Generated By Directional Pairing Of Boundary Elements Have Distinct Physical And Regulatory Properties, Wenfan Ke, Miki Fujioka, Paul Schedl, James Jaynes
Stem-Loop And Circle-Loop Tads Generated By Directional Pairing Of Boundary Elements Have Distinct Physical And Regulatory Properties, Wenfan Ke, Miki Fujioka, Paul Schedl, James Jaynes
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Faculty Papers
The chromosomes in multicellular eukaryotes are organized into a series of topologically independent loops called TADs. In flies, TADs are formed by physical interactions between neighboring boundaries. Fly boundaries exhibit distinct partner preferences, and pairing interactions between boundaries are typically orientation-dependent. Pairing can be head-to-tail or head-to-head. The former generates a stem-loop TAD, while the latter gives a circle-loop TAD. The TAD that encompasses the Drosophila even skipped (eve) gene is formed by the head-to-tail pairing of the nhomie and homie boundaries. To explore the relationship between loop topology and the physical and regulatory landscape, we flanked the nhomie boundary …
A Trna Modification Pattern That Facilitates Interpretation Of The Genetic Code, Isao Masuda, Ya-Ming Hou
A Trna Modification Pattern That Facilitates Interpretation Of The Genetic Code, Isao Masuda, Ya-Ming Hou
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Faculty Papers
Interpretation of the genetic code from triplets of nucleotides to amino acids is fundamental to life. This interpretation is achieved by cellular tRNAs, each reading a triplet codon through its complementary anticodon (positions 34–36) while delivering the amino acid charged to its 3′-end. This amino acid is then incorporated into the growing polypeptide chain during protein synthesis on the ribosome. The quality and versatility of the interpretation is ensured not only by the codon-anticodon pairing, but also by the post-transcriptional modifications at positions 34 and 37 of each tRNA, corresponding to the wobble nucleotide at the first position of the …
A Genome-Wide Screen Identifies Pdpk1 As A Target To Enhance The Efficacy Of Mek1/2 Inhibitors, Weijia Cai, Nicole A. Wilski, Timothy J. Purwin, Megane Vernon, Manoela Tiago, Andrew E. Aplin
A Genome-Wide Screen Identifies Pdpk1 As A Target To Enhance The Efficacy Of Mek1/2 Inhibitors, Weijia Cai, Nicole A. Wilski, Timothy J. Purwin, Megane Vernon, Manoela Tiago, Andrew E. Aplin
Department of Cancer Biology Faculty Papers
Melanomas frequently harbor activating NRAS mutations. However, limited advance has been made in developing targeted therapy options for NRAS mutant melanoma patients. MEK inhibitors (MEKi) show modest efficacy in the clinic and their actions need to be optimized. In this study, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9-based screen and demonstrated that loss of Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDPK1) enhances the efficacy of MEKi. The synergistic effects of PDPK1 loss and MEKi was validated in NRAS mutant melanoma cell lines using pharmacological and molecular approaches. Combined PDPK1 inhibitors (PDPK1i) with MEKi suppressed NRAS mutant xenograft growth and induced gasdermin E-associated pyroptosis. In an immune-competent …
Teratology Primer-2nd Edition (7/9/2010), Sura Alwan, Steven B. Bleyl, Robert L. Brent, Christina D. Chambers, George P. Daston, Elaine M. Faustman, Richard H. Finnell, F. Clarke Fraser, Jan M. Freidman, Adriane Fugh-Berman, John M. Graham, Jr., Barbara F. Hales, Deborah K. Hansen, Lewis B. Holmes, Ronald D. Hood, Robert J. Kavlock, Thomas B. Knudsen, Joseph Lary, Donald R. Mattison, Richard K. Miller, James L. Mills, Janine E. Polifka, Sonja A. Rasmussen, Bernard Robaire, John M. Rogers, Gary C. Schoenwolf, Anthony R. Scialli, Gary M. Shaw, Amar V. Singh, William Slikker, Jr., Ann P. Streissguth, Melissa S. Tassinari, Janet Uriu-Adams, Charles V. Vorhees, Elora J. Weringer
Teratology Primer-2nd Edition (7/9/2010), Sura Alwan, Steven B. Bleyl, Robert L. Brent, Christina D. Chambers, George P. Daston, Elaine M. Faustman, Richard H. Finnell, F. Clarke Fraser, Jan M. Freidman, Adriane Fugh-Berman, John M. Graham, Jr., Barbara F. Hales, Deborah K. Hansen, Lewis B. Holmes, Ronald D. Hood, Robert J. Kavlock, Thomas B. Knudsen, Joseph Lary, Donald R. Mattison, Richard K. Miller, James L. Mills, Janine E. Polifka, Sonja A. Rasmussen, Bernard Robaire, John M. Rogers, Gary C. Schoenwolf, Anthony R. Scialli, Gary M. Shaw, Amar V. Singh, William Slikker, Jr., Ann P. Streissguth, Melissa S. Tassinari, Janet Uriu-Adams, Charles V. Vorhees, Elora J. Weringer
Department of Pediatrics Faculty Papers
Foreword:
What is Teratology?
“What a piece of work is an embryo!” as Hamlet might have said. “In form and moving how express and admirable! In complexity how infinite!” It starts as a single cell, which by repeated divisions gives rise to many genetically identical cells. These cells receive signals from their surroundings and from one another as to where they are in this ball of cells —front or back, right or left, headwards or tailwards, and what they are destined to become. Each cell commits itself to being one of many types; the cells migrate, combine into tissues, or …