Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Environmental Health Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Health (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Cognition and Perception (1)
- Diseases (1)
-
- Disorders of Environmental Origin (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Environmental Public Health (1)
- Environmental Sciences (1)
- Law (1)
- Medical Sciences (1)
- Medical Toxicology (1)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Health (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Pharmacology, Toxicology and Environmental Health
Over A Decade Of Comparative Risk Analysis: A Review Of The Human Health Rankings, David M. Konisky
Over A Decade Of Comparative Risk Analysis: A Review Of The Human Health Rankings, David M. Konisky
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
The author reviews a method for undertaking a cross-project comparison of comparative risk analyses to understand which environmental problem areas have been cited most as often posing the severest risks.
Review Of: Lewis' Dictionary Of Toxicology (Robert A. Lewis, Ed.; Lewis Publishers 1998), Dana E. Evans
Review Of: Lewis' Dictionary Of Toxicology (Robert A. Lewis, Ed.; Lewis Publishers 1998), Dana E. Evans
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Review of the book: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology (Robert A. Lewis, ed.; Lewis Publishers 1998). About the author, acknowledgments, alphabetical listing of terms defined. ISBN 1-56670-223-2; [1127 pp. $84.95. Hardbound. 2000 Corporate Blvd. N.W., Boca Raton, FL 33431.]
Regulating Air Toxics In Rhode Island: Policy Vs. Technical Decisions, Julie A. Roque
Regulating Air Toxics In Rhode Island: Policy Vs. Technical Decisions, Julie A. Roque
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Dr. Roqu6 recounts her work as a doctoral candidate at Brown in developing standards for the regulation of airborne carcinogens. Based in part on this experience, she argues that care needs be taken lest those who regulate Risk bury key policy decisions within a mass of often irrelevant technical details.