Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Animal Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 10 of 10

Full-Text Articles in Animal Sciences

A Literature Review On Crossbreeding In Dairy Cattle, Philip Owens Dec 2010

A Literature Review On Crossbreeding In Dairy Cattle, Philip Owens

Dairy Science

The objective of the literature review was to determine whether or not crossbreeding is a profitable and a viable option for the dairymen of today by reviewing the literature and experiments that have been conducted throughout the world by today’s dairy professionals and leaders. The Dairy market today is increasingly competitive and more and more dairymen are considering crossbreeding to decrease health costs and increase profitability. Price premiums from cheese plants are given to milk producers for high components like protein and fat. In recent studies done by universities and research facilities around the world, results have found promising numbers …


W156-Clinical Mastitis Evaluation, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W156-Clinical Mastitis Evaluation, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W155-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Time Period, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W155-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Time Period, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W154-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Cow, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W154-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Cow, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W153-Forms Of Mastitis, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W153-Forms Of Mastitis, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W152-Estimating Losses Using Somatic Cell Counts, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W152-Estimating Losses Using Somatic Cell Counts, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W151-Bulk Tank Milk Quality Parameters, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W151-Bulk Tank Milk Quality Parameters, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

Bacteria in milk, whether originating from the cow or from the environment, significantly impact the quality of dairy products and therefore consumer acceptance. Bacteria produce heatstable enzymes that can damage milk fat and milk protein. These enzymes are not affected by pasteurization and continue to cause damage in the final dairy product. High bacteria levels in raw milk result in off-flavors, bitter flavors, rancidity and reduced shelf life. The Pasteurized Milk Ordinance specifies safety standards of Grade A milk to protect public health, not to maximize product quality and shelf life. The PMO only sets limits on somatic cell count …


W150-Using Milk Somatic Cell Count Information, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W150-Using Milk Somatic Cell Count Information, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

The level of mastitis infection in a dairy herd can have a significant impact on herd profitability. Losses due to mastitis include decreased milk production, increased treatment costs, discarded milk, premature culling, death, decreased genetic potential, decreased reproductive performance, load rejection due to violation of somatic cell counts (SCC) or antibiotic residues and loss of milk quality premiums (3, 9, 12). Most producers easily relate clinical mastitis with these losses. However, subclinical (or hidden) mastitis may actually cause more losses in a herd than clinical mastitis. Since the animal does not exhibit typical symptoms of the disease, the problem is …


W149-Bulk Tank Milk Quality, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W149-Bulk Tank Milk Quality, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

Who is responsible for the safety and quality of dairy products? Dairy producers? Processors? Retailers? Consumers? In fact, all of these parties – from farm to fork – share in this responsibility. What starts as a high-quality product on the farm can be ruined somewhere along this chain. However, a poor-quality, inferior raw product leaving the farm cannot be transformed into a safe and high-quality product for the consumer. Despite technical advances in milk processing, the safety and quality of dairy products is still determined on the farm. Pasteurization does provide a certain level of safety, but is not the …


W148-Milk Quality And The Tennessee Quality Milk Initiative, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W148-Milk Quality And The Tennessee Quality Milk Initiative, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

According to records, in 1995, there were more than 1300 dairy farms in Tennessee. In 2007, the number declined to fewer than 600 dairies (9). There are several reasons for this mass exodus from the dairy industry in Tennessee: low milk prices, shortages of qualified labor, high feed costs, high fertilizer costs, high fuel costs, etc. In addition, many dairy producers in Tennessee and in the Southern Region are at risk of losing their milk market due to below average milk quality. Milk quality continues to be a topic of intense debate in the dairy industry. Dairy producers in the …